https://www.facebook.com/103741685807184/

Roadside Legal Education, Central Business District, Abuja (2026)

28/08/2026

The same problem can require completely different solutions.

Two communities may both need clean water.

One needs a borehole.

Another needs to repair the one it already has.

The problem looks identical from a distance.

The solution may not be.

Good development starts by understanding the problem, not by arriving with a predetermined answer.

01/08/2026

August is here.

A new month doesn't automatically create new opportunities, but it does give us another opportunity to create change.

Somewhere this month, a child will need help staying in school.

A young person will be looking for a chance to learn a skill.

A family will need hope more than sympathy.

These realities don't change because the calendar changes. They change because people choose to act.

As we begin August, our commitment remains the same.

To keep lifting lives.

To keep building futures.

And to keep believing that lasting change is possible when communities, partners, and ordinary people come together with purpose.

What positive impact do you hope to make in someone's life this month, no matter how small?

Happy New Month from all of us at LiftOne Humanitarian Foundation .

30/07/2026

There is one question that can predict whether many community projects will succeed or quietly disappear a few years later.

"Whose project is this?"

If the answer is the NGO's project, the impact may end when the organisation leaves.

If the answer is our project, something different begins to happen.

People protect what they feel responsible for.

They maintain it.

Improve it.

Defend it.

Pass it on.

That is why meaningful development is not only about delivering solutions. It is about building ownership.

The most successful community projects are often the ones where local people are not just beneficiaries. They become partners, decision-makers, and custodians of the change they helped create.

At LiftOne Humanitarian Foundation , we believe lasting impact is built 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 communities, not simply 𝙛𝙤𝙧 communities.

In your opinion, what makes people truly take ownership of a community project?

30/07/2026

The planned lawsuit challenges mobile network operators such as MTN, Glo and Airtel for making prepaid data bundles expire and disappear if unused, and DStv for refusing true pay-as-you-watch options and instead forcing fixed-period subscriptions. The claim rests mainly on the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act 2018, which bans unfair, unreasonable or one-sided contract terms. Barr. Ogbaga Immanuel Ogba is a practising Nigerian lawyer, and the case is being funded privately by Truths while other lawyers are invited to join.

Under the 2018 Act, especially section 127, companies cannot force consumers into terms that are excessively one-sided or that take away rights without fair value. The Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission can investigate and enforce these rules across all sectors, including telecoms. The Nigerian Communications Commission already allows limited rollover of unused data for a few days if you renew on time, but it does not ban expiry completely. Courts have confirmed that both regulators share power, the competition commission leads on consumer fairness while the communications commission handles licences and technical rules.

Supporters of the suit will argue that once you pay for data or a subscription it becomes your property, so forcing it to vanish without compensation is unfair and should be stopped by the courts. They will ask for declarations that the terms are illegal, orders forcing better rollover or true usage based plans, and possible refunds. The companies will reply that the rules are clearly stated, standard worldwide, needed for network planning and pricing, and already allowed by the communications regulator, so courts should not rewrite normal business contracts.

If the case succeeds, a court could cancel the expiry rules, order longer automatic rollover or pay as you go options, and award compensation to people who lost data. If it fails, the current practices will be confirmed as lawful. Either way the process will likely be long and expensive, with possible settlements, partial reforms or further regulatory reviews along the way. No exact previous court decision on pure data-expiry forfeiture exists, so the result remains uncertain.

Testing these grey areas through carefully prepared lawsuits or formal complaints to the competition commission is a legitimate way for ordinary people to clarify their rights, create useful precedents and push companies and regulators toward fairer practices. Well-grounded collective action of this kind has brought changes in other countries and can do the same in Nigeria when done properly.

29/07/2026

1. What does the law say?

A police invitation is not the same as a conviction, and it is not automatically an arrest. The police have investigative powers under Nigerian law, but citizens also retain constitutional rights throughout the process.

2. Your constitutional rights still exist.

Section 35 of the Constitution protects your right to personal liberty, while Section 36 guarantees the right to a fair hearing. Being invited by the police does not suspend these protections.

3. Can you have a lawyer present?

Yes.

You may consult and be accompanied by a legal practitioner, especially where questioning could expose you to criminal liability. Seeking legal advice is a right, not an admission of guilt.

4. Should you ignore a police invitation?

Generally, no.

If the invitation is genuine, ignoring it can complicate matters. The wiser approach is to verify its authenticity, understand the purpose, and attend appropriately—preferably after obtaining legal advice where necessary.

5. One common misconception.

Many people assume that once they enter a police station, they must answer every question immediately.

The reality is more nuanced. Understanding your legal rights before making statements can make a significant difference.

6. Legal knowledge reduces fear.

Many people panic because they simply do not know the law. Public legal education helps citizens cooperate with lawful investigations while also protecting their constitutional rights.

7.

What other legal issues do you think Nigerians should understand better?

Leave them below. They may become part of our next Know Your Rights discussion.

19/07/2026

The Tragic Case of Favour Agbro and Odogwu Asaba – A Call for Justice and Systemic Reform

By Barr. Chukwuorji Igodo
Advocate for Justice and Human Rights

The recent case involving the late Favour Agbro and popular content creator Ifeanyi Ogbonna, known as Odogwu Asaba, in Delta State has gripped the nation and reignited urgent conversations about sexual violence, exploitation, and accountability in Nigeria. Reports indicate that the 20 year old aspiring content creator was allegedly lured to Asaba under the pretext of mentorship in social media monetization, only to suffer sexual assault at a hotel, leading to severe trauma that culminated in her tragic death by su***de. Before her passing, Favour recorded a poignant video detailing her ordeal, which has since circulated widely, prompting swift police action and the arrest of the suspect.

Under Nigerian law, r**e remains one of the most heinous offences, with the Violence Against Persons (Prohibition) Act (VAPP) 2015 providing a robust, gender-sensitive framework that criminalizes non-consensual pe*******on in all forms. Delta State’s domestication of relevant protections strengthens the legal basis for prosecution. The suspect’s reported confessional statements during investigation, alongside the victim’s pre-death video and other emerging evidence such as alleged communications, could prove pivotal. However, the death of the complainant does not preclude justice; the State can proceed based on available corroborative materials, including medical reports, witness statements, and digital evidence.

It is critical to emphasize that criminal matters of this gravity cannot be settled privately. Any attempt at out of court resolution through monetary compensation undermines the public interest and the rule of law. Prosecutors must vigorously pursue charges that reflect the full extent of the alleged harm, potentially including r**e, assault, and related offences contributing to the loss of life. The vulnerability of young women seeking economic opportunities online highlights the predatory risks in the digital space and the need for stronger safeguards.

This case also brings to the fore broader human rights concerns. Nigeria’s obligations under international instruments such as the ICCPR, the Maputo Protocol, and the Convention on the Rights of the Child demand effective protection for women and girls against gender-based violence. Failure to secure justice not only compounds the victim’s family’s grief but erodes public trust in the system. The Delta State Police Command’s prompt response is commendable, yet the process must be thorough, transparent, and insulated from influence.

We must confront the systemic issues this tragedy exposes: the exploitation of aspiring young talents, the mental health toll of sexual violence, inadequate support for survivors, and the societal stigma that often silences victims. Families facing medical debts and emotional devastation, as reportedly experienced by Favour’s loved ones, deserve comprehensive victim support mechanisms, including counseling, financial aid, and legal assistance.

As members of the legal community, we have a duty to advocate for swift and fair prosecution while pushing for reforms. These should include stricter regulation of online mentorship and influencer activities, mandatory mental health resources for survivors, enhanced training for law enforcement on digital evidence, and nationwide sensitization to combat victim-blaming. Every life lost to such circumstances is one too many.

May Favour Agbro’s memory drive meaningful change. Justice must not only be done but be seen to be done, sending a clear message that no one is above the law. I stand with calls for a thorough investigation and urge all stakeholders to prioritize the dignity and protection of vulnerable citizens.

I welcome constructive dialogue on how we can collectively strengthen our response to gender-based violence and protect our youth in an increasingly digital world.

Barr. Chukwuorji Igodo
Legal Practitioner | Human Rights Advocate | Championing Justice Reform in Nigeria

19/07/2026

The Death of Miss Mary Habila at the Residence of the Honourable Minister of Works – Reflections on Equality Before the Law.

By Barr. Chukwuorji Igodo
Advocate for Justice and Human Rights

The unfortunate death of Miss Mary Habila, a young nurse/physiotherapist, at the country home of the Honourable Minister of Works, Senator David Umahi, in Uburu, Ebonyi State, has sparked widespread public concern and debate. Reports indicate that the 26 year old died under circumstances that remain subject to investigation, with calls for a thorough, independent probe to establish the exact cause. The Minister has publicly denied any foul play, described the deceased as someone dear to his family who had worked with him for years, and repeatedly called for an autopsy to clarify matters. He has also indicated that legal action may be taken against those spreading what he considers defamatory narratives.

In any democracy governed by the rule of law, every unnatural death, particularly one occurring at the private residence of a high-ranking public official, demands the highest level of transparency and impartial investigation. Nigerian law, through the Criminal Procedure Act/Code and relevant coronial provisions, requires prompt reporting to the police, preservation of the scene, and professional forensic examination such as autopsy. The presumption of innocence applies to all, including public officials, but this must be balanced with the public’s right to know and the need for accountability where power and influence are involved.

A troubling aspect of cases like this is the perceived disparity in how the justice system operates when a “big man” is implicated. Ordinary citizens often face swift arrests, media trials, and intense scrutiny, while matters involving ministers, governors, or politically connected individuals frequently proceed with caution, delays, or protracted investigations that yield little public closure. In this instance, the Minister’s position as a key figure in the administration and a strategic stakeholder in Southeast politics adds another layer. His influence and alignment with President Bola Tinubu’s government have positioned him as an important access point for the ruling party in the region ahead of future elections. This political capital can inadvertently or deliberately create an environment where thorough scrutiny is muted to protect broader alliances.

Even if new facts emerge suggesting more grave circumstances, history suggests that powerful figures in Nigeria often navigate such controversies with minimal consequences. This reality erodes public confidence and reinforces the notion that justice is not blind but selective. The calls by civil society groups for an independent probe, free from interference, protection of witnesses, and full forensic analysis are therefore not only legitimate but necessary to uphold constitutional principles of equality before the law under Section 36 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended).

Beyond the immediate facts, this case highlights systemic challenges: the vulnerability of young women in professional or dependent relationships with powerful men, the importance of mental and physical health support for those in such environments, and the urgent need for institutional safeguards that prevent any appearance of cover-up. An autopsy, conducted transparently with involvement of neutral pathologists if required, remains the gold standard for resolving doubts. Families should not be pressured culturally or otherwise to forgo it when public interest is high.

As legal practitioners, we must continue to demand that investigations into Miss Habila’s death be conducted expeditiously, professionally, and without regard to status. The outcome must be communicated clearly to the public. Anything less would deepen cynicism about our justice system and the commitment of those in power to serve the people rather than shield themselves.

May this tragedy prompt genuine reflection and reform. True leadership includes subjecting oneself to the same standards one expects of ordinary citizens. Justice delayed or perceived as denied, especially in high-profile cases, weakens the social contract that holds our nation together.

I welcome measured discussions on how we can bridge the gap between the ideal of equal justice and the realities of power in Nigeria.

Barr. Chukwuorji Igodo
Legal Practitioner | Human Rights Advocate | Championing Justice Reform in Nigeria

18/07/2026

Legal Opinion: Addressing Male Sexual Violence, Access to Justice, and Systemic Challenges in Nigeria

By Barr. Chukwuorji Igodo
Advocate for Justice and Human Rights

In recent times, the Nigerian justice system has been confronted with complex cases that test our legal frameworks, particularly around sexual offences involving male victims. One such matter involved the alleged r**e of a disabled man in Enugu State, where the nominal complainant the victim’s father reportedly withdrew the case following monetary compensation. This development raises profound questions about accountability, the protection of vulnerable persons, and the integrity of criminal prosecutions in our country.

Nigerian law has evolved to address sexual violence more inclusively. While older provisions in the Criminal Code and Penal Code traditionally focused on female victims, the Violence Against Persons (Prohibition) Act (VAPP) 2015 domesticated in Enugu and several other states marks a significant advancement. Section 1 of the VAPP Act defines r**e in gender-neutral terms: a person commits the offence of r**e if he or she intentionally penetrates the va**na, a**s, or mouth of another person with any part of his or her body or anything else, without consent or where consent is obtained by force, threat, intimidation, or other vitiating factors. This provision explicitly recognizes male victims and various forms of pe*******on, filling critical gaps in earlier legislation. Additional protections exist under indecent assault provisions, and the victim’s disability invokes safeguards under the Discrimination Against Persons with Disabilities (Prohibition) Act 2018, which demands heightened sensitivity and accommodations in proceedings.

Importantly, serious criminal offences like r**e are prosecuted in the name of the State, not private individuals. Victims or their guardians cannot unilaterally withdraw or “settle” such matters through monetary compensation. Such compounding of felonies undermines public interest and can itself attract legal consequences. Prosecutors and courts must prioritize societal protection, especially where vulnerable groups are involved.

Nigeria’s commitments under international instruments including the ICCPR, CAT, CRPD, and CEDAW require effective measures to prevent, investigate, and punish sexual violence against all persons, without discrimination based on gender or disability. International jurisprudence recognizes male sexual victimization as a serious violation that may amount to torture or inhuman treatment. States have a due diligence duty to ensure access to justice, particularly for persons with disabilities who face compounded vulnerabilities. The failure to fully prosecute such cases not only denies justice to the immediate victim but also deprives the legal system of opportunities to develop clear precedents on the ingredients of male r**e, evidentiary standards, and sentencing.

This scenario underscores a painful reality: poverty continues to impair access to justice in Nigeria. Economic pressures often lead families to accept settlements, allowing perpetrators to evade accountability. This is particularly troubling in sexual violence matters, where power imbalances, stigma, and under-reporting are already rampant. Men and boys who are victims deserve the same robust protection and societal support as female victims a principle of equality that strengthens, rather than diminishes, our collective fight against gender-based violence.

The justice system must respond with reforms including strengthened legal aid and victim support funds, witness protection programs, mandatory training for law enforcement and the judiciary on handling male victimization and disability cases, consistent domestication and enforcement of the VAPP Act nationwide, and public awareness campaigns to reduce stigma and encourage reporting.

As legal practitioners and stakeholders in the justice sector, we must advocate for a system that upholds the rule of law without compromise. Every victim, regardless of gender or physical condition, deserves full protection and remedies. Poverty should never determine outcomes in criminal justice. It is incumbent upon us the Bar, the Bench, civil society, and government to ensure that cases of this nature are prosecuted vigorously to build precedent, deter offenders, and affirm the dignity of all citizens.

True justice requires vigilance, empathy, and unwavering commitment to equity. Let us continue pushing for reforms that make access to justice a reality for every Nigerian, not a privilege for the few.

I welcome thoughtful engagement on these critical issues. How can we better strengthen protections for male victims of sexual violence while addressing systemic barriers like poverty?

Barr. Igodo Chukwuorji
Legal Practitioner | Human Rights Advocate | Championing Justice Reform in Nigeria

18/06/2026

Last week, a landlord approached me for some legal services.
His rent was fixed at 240k per apartment annually.

Earlier this month, he came back from a long trip and went to see the tenants for the first time in a long time.
He informed the tenants that due to the cost of things in the market and the inflation rate, he'll be increasing his rent from 240k to 350k

The tenants were shocked and told him they've been paying 500k to the caretaker. Unbeknownst to him the caretaker has been collecting 500k since the last 2yrs instead of 240k but has been religiously remitting 240k per flat to him.

What remedies do you think is available to the landlord, what should he do?

20/04/2026

This court order is basically a judge stepping in to stop one person (Umar Yusuf) from blocking or silencing another person (Jibrin Mohammed) on Facebook (or any other social media).

Let me explain it to you like i would to a 7 years old.
So, this is what happened:
Two guys were talking politics online. They disagreed strongly. At some point Umar got fed up with Jibrin’s opinions and used the “block” button on Facebook. That instantly cut Jibrin off , he could no longer see Umar’s posts, comment on them, message him, or interact in any way. In Umar’s mind it was probably just “I don’t want to hear from this guy anymore.” But in Jibrin’s mind it felt like being gagged: “You’re stopping me from expressing my political views and joining the public discussion.”
That disagreement + the block is the first question that arose. It’s the everyday fight that started everything.
What happened second (the question that came after):
Jibrin didn’t just get angry and move on. He ran to the High Court in Yola and said, “This block is violating my constitutional right to freedom of expression and political participation.” He asked the judge for an urgent temporary order (called an “ex-parte” motion) without Umar even being in court yet.
The judge read Jibrin’s papers, agreed it looked serious, and on 10th April 2026 issued this order. In plain English the judge is saying:
“Umar, until we hear both sides properly, you must immediately unblock Jibrin, stop muting him, stop restricting him, and let him interact with you on social media. You cannot punish him just because your political opinions differ. The Constitution protects his right to speak and engage in politics, so hands off for now.”
Why a court would even care about a Facebook block (you would ask):
Think of the Nigerian Constitution like the big rule book that protects every citizen’s voice. Section 39 says you have the right to express your opinions freely. Section 40 adds that you can join others in discussing public matters (political engagement).
Normally, Facebook is a private app and you can block whoever you want. But when someone uses that private button specifically to shut down political talk, the court here is treating it as stepping on a constitutional right. It’s like one neighbour building a fence that deliberately blocks the other neighbour from using the public road ,the court can say “tear that part of the fence down until we decide if the whole fence is legal.”
So the first question (political disagreement → block) came before the second question (is this block actually illegal under the Constitution?). The judge answered the second one quickly with this temporary order, but the full fight will happen later when Umar gets his chance to speak in court.
That’s the whole drama in everyday language.

Roadside Legal Education

28/08/2026

01/08/2026

30/07/2026

30/07/2026

29/07/2026

19/07/2026

19/07/2026

18/07/2026

18/06/2026

20/04/2026

Address

Telephone

Website

Alerts

Contact The Business

Shortcuts

Share

Category

Listing takedown request