Akenga Kimutai & Associates Advocates

Akenga Kimutai & Associates Advocates Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from Akenga Kimutai & Associates Advocates, Lawyer & Law Firm, KVDA Plaza 5th Floor, Oloo Street, Eldoret.

03/06/2020

Good morning!
Opposing Counsel: 9 Ways To Handle Difficult Lawyers.

03/06/2020

Success in your legal practice has a lot to do with the way you handle the opposing counsel.
Every lawyer who has practiced long enough, especially in litigation, must have met an opposing counsel who made his or her job difficult.
A difficult opposing counsel is every legal practitioner’s nightmare. Even judges dread the thought of presiding over matters involving a difficult lawyer.
Their fears are understandable. Difficult lawyers seem to have a penchant for employing unethical tactics to win a case.
According to some lawyers, dealing with a difficult opposing counsel is one of the most stressful aspects of their jobs.
Since some opposing lawyers have formed the habit of aggression, it makes no sense trying to talk them out of it.
Habits, when formed and done repeatedly, are not easily broken. Your best bet is to develop strategies in handling tricky opposing lawyers.
If you want to become a successful lawyer learn how to deal with difficult opposing counsel:
1. Resist The Temptation To Retaliate.
Over time, most judges notice the antics of difficult opposing lawyers and deal with them accordingly.
So save your energy. Please don’t allow the other lawyer to make you the cantankerous chap that he or she is. Each time you retaliate, you give the impressions that you are both birds of a feather. You know the saying, ‘birds of a feather flock together?’ Most judges believe that cliché.
Picture this: It’s a warm sunny day. You’re taking a dip in the pool. A mentally ill man sneaks into the vicinity, and gathers your clothing in his arms. It’s his maddening guffaw that alerts you. And you catch a glimpse of him as he bolts off into the streets. Will you:
• Run after him without your clothes on?
• Will you seethe quietly and let him go?
You know the answer. If you ran after him, onlookers would point to the two lunatics in the street.
Is that what you would want?
Learn to let go.
2. Know the Facts of your Case.
Having the facts of your case on your fingertips will enable you to stay ahead of the opposing counsel.
One tactic employed by difficult opposing lawyers is to distract you in every way possible.
A lawyer who knows the facts of his case will not veer off course by joining issues with an opposing counsel on extraneous matters.
3. Be Courageous.
A Difficult opposing counsel can sometimes be downright intimidating. But most experienced lawyers have learned that being courageous is one of the best ways to deal with them.
If you are courageous, the other lawyer will soon realize the futility if his/her gimmicks.
Courageous lawyers are always ready to present their cases and back them up with facts and legal authorities.

4. Be Civil.
Civility lies at the core of the legal profession. The legal profession expects every lawyer to act with the utmost courtesy both in and outside the court.
There is always a temptation to throw civility out of the window and display aggressive behavior towards an opposing counsel. Big mistake!
When you are civil, you exert positive energy, felt not only by your opponents but also by the judge.
Many lawyers on receiving correspondence from an opposing counsel will quickly put pen to paper and write a no-holds-barred letter in reply.
Most of these letters written in the heat of the moment have a way of returning to haunt you.
Remember, law practice is a mental game played with tact, not emotions.
5. Be Proactive.
One great way to handle difficult opposing lawyers is to be proactive. If you are always reacting to what the opposing lawyer is throwing your way, you’ll regularly be playing catch up.
To be proactive, lawyers must have a plan of action and anticipate the next move of the opposing counsel, just like in a chess game.
By preempting the moves of the lawyer on the other side, you will avoid delays caused by your opponent’s delayed actions.
6. Be Assertive.
The reason many lawyers are uncivil and aggressive comes from the desire to please their clients.
There is certainly a popular misconception by the public that lawyers who are difficult and aggressive are the ones who can bring in results.
Many new lawyers coming out of law school also fall into this error when they see difficult lawyers playing to the gallery in court.
To impress their clients, many lawyers, ‘put on a show’, by coming up with different manners of unethical procedures and tricks.
But, instead of being aggressive – be assertive. Enlighten your clients on the futility and disadvantages of being aggressive.
Research has shown that being assertive reduces your stress and helps you deal with difficult situations.
Assertive lawyers are rarely intimidated and can succinctly make their points without insulting the other side.
7. Be Calm.
Although controlling one’s emotions in the face of extreme provocation can be difficult, learn to summon all of your willpower in staying calm.
It’s always a thing of joy to see lawyers who remain calm even under the most vicious attacks from an opposing counsel.
Calm lawyers are usually the most efficient because they do not allow their emotions to becloud their sense of reasoning.
Nothing upsets an opposing counsel more than a calm and collected lawyer. A relaxed lawyer who is not overwhelmed with emotion is less likely to make mistakes in his case.
8. Don’t be distracted.
In most cases, all the difficult opposing counsel wants to achieve is to distract you and the court.
One way opposing lawyers distract their opponents by filing incessant motions to frustrate a matter.
Some lawyers are easily distracted by allowing every issue raised by an opposing lawyer to become a dispute.
While it is essential to react to some motions, learn to ignore harmless ones. Select your battles and stick to them.

9. Follow the Laws, Rules, and Procedure.
By following the law and sticking to the rules of procedure, you will be able to control errant opposing lawyers.
Knowing the law, rules, and procedure is a good technique in checkmating some of the antics of difficult lawyers.
Make use of the laws and rules of procedure to stay ahead of your opponents.
Winding Up on Opposing Counsel.
There will always be difficult people in every profession, and the legal career is not an exception.
A difficult opposing counsel should be handled like a festering boil near your eyelids, lest they harm you and your case.
Save yourself from stress and despair in your legal practice by learning how to deal and relate with difficult lawyers.
Have you met a difficult lawyer? How did you handle it?
Akenga advocate.

A declaration  issued that the continued  delay to appoint  by the President,persons recommended  as judges of the vario...
07/02/2020

A declaration issued that the continued delay to appoint by the President,persons recommended as judges of the various courts is a violation of the constitution

THE HON. CHIEF JUSTICE AND                                                                         

Magistrates Courts have power to hear claims for adverse possession
06/02/2020

Magistrates Courts have power to hear claims for adverse possession

1. The plaintiff commenced proceedings in this case on 9th January 2019 through Originating Summons of even date whereby he seeks a declaration that he has acquired the parcel of land known as Bahati/Kabatini  Block 1/9983 (hereinafter “the suit property”) through adverse possession. The record...

Court orders the ope rationalization of  the Intelligence Service Complaints Board to enable  civilian oversight over th...
04/02/2020

Court orders the ope rationalization of the Intelligence Service Complaints Board to enable civilian oversight over the National Intelligence Service (NIS)

CABINET SECRETARY, MINISTY INTERIOR AND                                                                 

Section 96 (a) of the Penal Code declared unconstitutional  to the extent that it shifts the legal and evidential burden...
04/02/2020

Section 96 (a) of the Penal Code declared unconstitutional to the extent that it shifts the legal and evidential burden of proof to an accused person before the prosecution has discharged its legal burden of proof in a criminal trial.

Senator Johnstone Muthama v Director of Public Prosecutions & 2 others; Japhet Muriira Muroko (Interested Party) [2020] eKLR

Court quashes the Public Procurement Administrative Review Board(PPARB)  decision on Request for Review regarding  the f...
31/01/2020

Court quashes the Public Procurement Administrative Review Board(PPARB) decision on Request for Review regarding the funding, design, build, own, operate and transfer of the High Grand Falls Dam Project in Kitui, Tana River and Garissa Counties

Republic v Public Procurement Administrative Review Board;Consortium of GBM Projects Limited and ERG Insaat Ticaret Ve Sanayi A.S (interested party) ;National Irrigation Board Ex Parte [2020] eKLR

15/10/2019

DCI has no authority to probe tax evasion claim, judge rules

The High Court has dealt a major blow to the fight against tax evasion, ruling that the Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI) has no authority to investigate alleged tax cheats.

Justice Luka Kimaru ruled that under the tax laws, it is only the Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) that is mandated to investigate and prosecute cases of tax evasion or instruct the Asset Recovery Authority to institute recovery of taxes.

Justice Kimaru made the ruling in a case in which billionaire businessman Humphrey Kariuki’s companies have challenged an order obtained by DCI officers to investigate and freeze their accounts.

“It is evident that there was an element of jurisdictional overreach by the DCI on matters which are statutorily under the jurisdiction of KRA and the Asset Recovery Authority. In the performance of its duties, the DCI must respect the authority of other institutions,” ruled the judge.

Justice Kimaru also upheld an order directing the unfreezing of several bank accounts of Mr. Kariuki’s companies, noting that the order to freeze the bank accounts was obtained illegally since it was never sought in the application lodged by the DCI.

The court ruled the billionaire's companies, Africa Spirits Limited and Wow Beverages Ltd, had proved the orders were illegal since the firms were never served in the first instance to present documents the investigators were looking for.

According to the judge, police investigators only have the power to ask for orders to access account details but not to ask for orders to freeze an account.

“The Evidence Act grants a police officer investigating an offence power to access to an account held in a bank for the purposes of investigations, but it does not grant the investigating officer power to apply for the seizure, freezing or the preservation of the contents in the account,” ruled Kimaru.

He said that it was clear the application the DCI sought before the magistrate’s court at Kiambu against Kariuki’s bank accounts was not to freeze the accounts and the magistrate made a mistake in issuing an order which was not sought.

Justice Kimaru added that in instances where the police want to investigate a person’s account, the holder of such an account should be served at the appropriate time and notified of the reasons.

“In conducting investigations, the police must at all times respect the rights of those they are investigating. That right includes the right to enable those affected by the orders issued by the court to be heard,” ruled Kimaru.

He stated that it is wrong for investigators to claim they are acting to safeguard public interest when they are breaking the law.

The judge said the police cannot be allowed to benefit from outright illegality on claims that they are acting in the public interest.

Kariuki, in his application filed through lawyer Cecil Miller, argued the order freezing his companies' nine accounts was unlawful and meant to cripple their operations after the DPP failed to link its directors to the tax evasion claims.

He accused the DPP of acting in bad faith and abusing the court process, arguing that the decision to file the application in Kiambu was to get a favorable magistrate to rule in their favour after a similar application was declined by a magistrate in Nairobi.

Photos of a man and a woman together do not prove marriage but can be a ground for a presumption  of marriage through co...
24/07/2019

Photos of a man and a woman together do not prove marriage but can be a ground for a presumption of marriage through cohabitation

1. This ruling is in regard to the summons for revocation of grant dated 20th February 2014. The applicants seek revocation of the letters of administration issued to the respondent on the 27th January 2014 on the grounds that: -

Section 2 (e),10, 16, 23, 26 and 53 (2) (d) and   the entire part IV and V of Work Injury Benefit Act   declared unconst...
24/06/2019

Section 2 (e),10, 16, 23, 26 and 53 (2) (d) and the entire part IV and V of Work Injury Benefit Act declared unconstitutional

IN THE MATTER OF:  ARTICLES 1, 2 ,6, 10, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25,27,28, 40, 48,50, 52, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 169 (1), 169(2), 258,259 AND 260 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA 2010, THE 5TH SCHEDULE AND SECTION 7(1) OF SCHEDULE 6 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA

Court rules abortion remains illegal in Kenya, but reinstates ministry of heath guidelines on safe abortion which had be...
22/06/2019

Court rules abortion remains illegal in Kenya, but reinstates ministry of heath guidelines on safe abortion which had been withdrawn

Federation of Women Lawyers (Fida – Kenya) & 3 others v Attorney General & 2 others; East Africa Center for Law & Justice & 6 others (Interested Party) & Women’s Link Worldwide & 2 others (Amicus Curiae) [2019] eKLR

Circumstances where a police officer can rely on the defense of self-defense in a fatal shooting
04/06/2019

Circumstances where a police officer can rely on the defense of self-defense in a fatal shooting

Criminal Law-murder-ingredients of the offence of murder-burden of proof- where accused persons relied on the defence of self-defence-what were the ingredients that the prosecution needed to prove in an offence of murder -Penal Code, sections 203 and 204

Address

KVDA Plaza 5th Floor, Oloo Street
Eldoret
30100

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Akenga Kimutai & Associates Advocates posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share