GUPTE LEGAL

GUPTE LEGAL litigation non litigation.

E-filing, Civil, consumer, Criminal, Testamentary, family, arbitration, banking and finance, accident insurance, real estate, CO-op society, domestic violence, 138 negotiable instruments act redevelopment projects

*Levying 'service charge' is illegal: Govt to restaurants*
02/06/2022

*Levying 'service charge' is illegal: Govt to restaurants*

New Delhi: The Ministry of Consumer Affairs on Thursday told restaurants not to levy 'service charge&apo

Equal Opportunity In Public Employment A Constitutional Mandate But Appointment Can't Be Claimed As A Matter Of Absolute...
31/05/2022

Equal Opportunity In Public Employment A Constitutional Mandate But Appointment Can't Be Claimed As A Matter Of Absolute Right: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court recently observed that in matters ofpublic employments, equal opportunities should be granted. Whenever a decision is taken with respect to recruitment, the competent authorities...

Girl leaving parental home with boy on attaining age of discretion is not kidnapping: Madhya Pradesh High CourtThe High ...
18/05/2022

Girl leaving parental home with boy on attaining age of discretion is not kidnapping: Madhya Pradesh High Court

The High Court, therefore, set aside an order of trial court convicting the accused.

*Read more at https://bit.ly/3MsnlGv*

Madhya Pradesh High Court recently observed that when a girl, who has attained the age of discretion, leaves her parents' house to be with a boy who facilitates the same, it will not amount to kidnapping or abduction.

15/01/2022

_*⭐SC:SSs. 482, 173 and 156(3) - High Court quashing entire criminal proceedings under S. 482 CrPC, without discussing anything on merits - In final police report it was specifically concluded on basis of material on record that a prima facie case was made out for the offences alleged against the accused persons Impugned order set aside - Prosecution against accused in respect of alleged fraudulent re-selling of plot sold to appellant complainant, directed to proceed further in accordance with law.*_

_Appellant complainant had filed complaint against respondent-accused, alleging that the very plot which was sold to appellant by owner R-1 (accused), was fraudulently resold by owner, after changing its number and redesignating the plot, to R-2 (accused), who was husband of R-1- R-2 thereon sold the very plot in favour of R-3 (accused) - FIR was lodged by police and final report submitted by investigating officer under S.173 CrPC, concluded, that accused persons colluded and committed offences under Ss. 420, 464, 465, 467, 468 and 471 r/w S. 34 IPC - However, without discussing anything on merits of final report, quashing by High Court of entire criminal proceedings, including final report, in exercise of powers under S. 482, held, erroneous - Hence, impugned judgment and order passed by High Court, hereby quashed and set aside - Consequently, prosecution against accused, directed to proceed further, in accordance with law, and on its own merits - Penal Code, 1860, Ss. 420, 464, 465, 467, 468 and 471 r/w S. 34 the im (Paras 5 to 7)._

_Case:_
_*Saraswatibai Vs. Lalitabai.*_

_Citation:_
_*(2019) 16 SCC 272*

15/01/2022

_*⭐SC:SSs. 482, 173 and 156(3) - High Court quashing entire criminal proceedings under S. 482 CrPC, without discussing anything on merits - In final police report it was specifically concluded on basis of material on record that a prima facie case was made out for the offences alleged against the accused persons Impugned order set aside - Prosecution against accused in respect of alleged fraudulent re-selling of plot sold to appellant complainant, directed to proceed further in accordance with law.*_

_Appellant complainant had filed complaint against respondent-accused, alleging that the very plot which was sold to appellant by owner R-1 (accused), was fraudulently resold by owner, after changing its number and redesignating the plot, to R-2 (accused), who was husband of R-1- R-2 thereon sold the very plot in favour of R-3 (accused) - FIR was lodged by police and final report submitted by investigating officer under S.173 CrPC, concluded, that accused persons colluded and committed offences under Ss. 420, 464, 465, 467, 468 and 471 r/w S. 34 IPC - However, without discussing anything on merits of final report, quashing by High Court of entire criminal proceedings, including final report, in exercise of powers under S. 482, held, erroneous - Hence, impugned judgment and order passed by High Court, hereby quashed and set aside - Consequently, prosecution against accused, directed to proceed further, in accordance with law, and on its own merits - Penal Code, 1860, Ss. 420, 464, 465, 467, 468 and 471 r/w S. 34 the im (Paras 5 to 7)._

_Case:_
_*Saraswatibai Vs. Lalitabai.*_

_Citation:_
_*(2019) 16 SCC 272*_
***************************
_*ADV. SURAJ GUPTE,*_
_*MUMBAI.*_
_*Mobile: 99967690902*_
***************************

17/05/2021

_*⭐️SC:All Stay Orders On Civil/Criminal Proceedings Passed By Courts, Including HCs, To Automatically Expire Within 6 Months Unless Extended For Good Reasons.*_

_We expect that the Magistrates all over the country will follow our order in letter and spirit. Whatever stay has been granted by any court including the High Court automatically expires within a period of six months, and unless extension is granted for good reason, as per our judgment, within the next six months, the trial Court is, on the expiry of the first period of six months, to set a date for the trial and go ahead with the same._

_Case:_
_*Asian Resurfacing Of Road Agency Pvt. Ltd. and Anr Vs Central Bureau of Investigation.*_

_*Miscellaneous Application No.1577 of 2020 in Criminal Appeal Nos. 1375-1376 of 2013. Order dated 15/10/2020.*

Negotiable instruments act
16/05/2021

Negotiable instruments act

19/04/2021

The Nagpur Bench of the will continue hearing its suo motu PIL regarding the non-availability of crucial anti-viral drugs Tocilizumab and Remdesivir, lack of oxygen supply, and hospital beds, in Nagpur.

19/04/2021

special bench led by Justice L Nageswara Rao hears an application filed for modification of the direction pertaining to the constitution of Search cm Selection Committee in Madras Bar Association v. Union of India

Address

Ambalal Doshi Road, Fort
Mumbai
400001

Opening Hours

Monday 9am - 1pm
Tuesday 9am - 1pm
Wednesday 9am - 1pm
Thursday 9am - 1pm
Friday 9am - 1pm

Telephone

+919967690902

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when GUPTE LEGAL posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to GUPTE LEGAL:

Share