GS legal consultant

23/07/2026

जब पुलिस कार्रवाई से ज़्यादा चर्चा एक Burger की होने लगे, तो सवाल उठना लाज़मी है—क्या असली मुद्दा पीछे छूट गया?
लाखों छात्रों का भविष्य, NEET 2026 परीक्षा से जुड़े आरोप, विरोध प्रदर्शन, और प्रदर्शनकारियों पर हुई पुलिस कार्रवाई जैसे गंभीर मुद्दों पर भी उतनी ही चर्चा होनी चाहिए जितनी किसी वायरल वीडियो पर होती है।
किसी व्यक्ति से सहमत या असहमत होना अलग बात है, लेकिन असली सवाल यह है कि क्या हम मुद्दे से भटक रहे हैं?
आपकी राय क्या है? क्या सार्वजनिक बहस का केंद्र असली मुद्दा होना चाहिए या वायरल विवाद? अपनी राय कमेंट में बताइए।

22/07/2026

Supporting students who are peacefully protesting is one thing, but turning a protest site into a display of weapons is another.

To the Nihang Sikhs who have reached Jantar Mantar in solidarity with the students: if your intention is to support the movement, then let that support strengthen it—not shift the focus away from the students' demands. Waving kirpans everywhere for cameras or appearing confrontational risks changing the public narrative.

Today, many students may appreciate your presence. But if the situation escalates or violence breaks out, there is a real possibility that the original cause could be overshadowed, and allegations may arise that the protest was "hijacked" by extremist elements. Whether such claims are fair or not, they can divert attention from the students' legitimate concerns.

History shows that direct confrontation with the state often comes at a heavy cost. Sacrifice has meaning when it advances the objective. Becoming martyrs without achieving the purpose does little to secure justice for those you intended to support.

If the goal is justice for students, then discipline, restraint, and keeping the focus on their demands is the strongest form of solidarity.

15/07/2026

Sonam Wangchuk continues his indefinite hunger strike, demanding transparency and accountability in India's examination system.
Stay informed. Read the facts. Form your own opinion.
What's your views ?

10/07/2026

🚨 हिसार के माता-पिता सावधान! 🚨

क्या आपका नाबालिग बच्चा 🚲🏍️🚗 वाहन चला रहा है?

⚖️ मोटर वाहन अधिनियम, 1988 की धारा 199A के अनुसार, यदि कोई Juvenile (18 वर्ष से कम आयु) वाहन चलाते हुए अपराध करता है, तो उसके गंभीर कानूनी परिणाम हो सकते हैं।

📌 जानिए क्या हो सकता है:
💰 ₹25,000 तक का जुर्माना
⛓️ अभिभावक/वाहन स्वामी को 3 वर्ष तक की सज़ा
🚫 वाहन का Registration (RC) 12 महीने तक रद्द
🪪 नाबालिग को 25 वर्ष की आयु तक Driving Licence न मिलने का प्रावधान

👨‍👩‍👦 अपने बच्चों का भविष्य सुरक्षित रखें।
🙏 उन्हें नाबालिग अवस्था में वाहन चलाने के लिए प्रोत्साहित न करें।

📍 GS Legal Consultant Advisors
⚖️ Legal Awareness | Hisar, Haryana

19/06/2026

LANDMARK JUDGMENT

Mohan Lal v. State of Punjab
2018 (9) SCALE 663 : AIR 2018 SC 3853 : 2019 Cri LJ 420 : 2018 (3) Crimes 218

📅 Decided on: 16-08-2018

👨‍⚖️ Hon'ble Judges:
Ranjan Gogoi, R. Banumathi and Navin Sinha, JJ.

Facts:
The appellant was convicted under Section 18 of the NDPS Act for recovery of o***m from a bag carried by him.

Issue:
Whether it will be in consonance with principles of justice, fair play and fair investigation in criminal prosecution, if informant and Investigating Officer were to be the same person? Whether it was necessary to demonstrate prejudice by accused?

Held:
Fair investigation, the very foundation of fair trial, necessarily postulates that informant and investigator must not be the same person. Any possibility of bias or pre-determined conclusion has to be excluded. Justice must not only be done but must appear to be done also.

Recovery memo was not signed by the accused and copies of documents were not supplied to the accused nor any memo prepared in his presence in this regard. Prosecution vitiated because of infraction of constitutional guarantee of fair investigation.

In criminal prosecution, obligation is cast on Investigator not only to be fair, judicious and just during investigation, but also that investigation on the face of it must appear to be so, eschewing any conduct or impression giving rise to any real or genuine apprehension.

19/06/2026

This is our YouTube channel you can subscribe for new law updates.

LawHut – Legal Awareness in Hindi | Advocate Gurjant Singh Welcome to LawHut, your trusted source for simple and practical legal knowledge in Hindi. Main hoon Advocate Gurjant Singh, practicing in District & Sessions Court, Hisar, Haryana. Is channel par aapko FIR, Bail, Cheque Bounce Cases, RTI, ...

19/06/2026

Kya Court Reputation Par Bhi Dhyan Deti Hai?

Ek matrimonial matter mein Court ke samne ek pamphlet record par laya gaya jiska title tha:

"Papa Sudhar Jaiye Nai Mummy Mat Laiye"

Court ne observe kiya ki pamphlet ke contents ek practicing doctor ki reputation ko nuksan pahunchane wale ho sakte the.

Court ne yeh bhi kaha ki record par aisa koi convincing material nahi tha jisse yeh sabit ho sake ki pamphlet wife ne publish karwaya tha ya uske nirdesh par publish hua tha.

Lekin Court ke anusaar paristhitiyan yeh sanket karti thi ki pamphlet ko petitioner/respondent ke khilaf publish ya circulate kiya gaya ho sakta tha.

📖 Vimla Ladkani v. Chandra Prakash
AIR 1996 MP 86

💡 Court ne yeh bhi observe kiya ki pamphlet ke contents ek practicing doctor ki reputation ko prabhavit kar sakte the.

⚠️ Har case apne facts aur evidence ke aadhar par decide kiya jata hai.

17/06/2026

Judicial Separation Under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: An Alternative to Divorce

Marriage is a sacred institution, but there are situations where husband and wife face serious differences and find it difficult to live together. However, not every marital dispute necessarily leads to divorce. The law recognizes that spouses may require time and space to reconsider their relationship before taking the drastic step of dissolving the marriage.

For such situations, the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 provides the remedy of Judicial Separation.

What is Judicial Separation?

Judicial Separation is a legal process under Section 10 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 through which a husband or wife can obtain a decree from the Court allowing them to live separately without terminating the marriage.

Unlike divorce, a decree of judicial separation does not dissolve the marriage. The marital bond continues to exist, but the obligation to cohabit comes to an end.

Grounds for Judicial Separation

A petition for judicial separation may be filed on the same grounds that are available for divorce, including:

• Cruelty
• Desertion
• Adultery
• Conversion to another religion
• Mental disorder
• Venereal disease in a communicable form
• Renunciation of the world
• Presumption of death

The Court examines the facts and circumstances of each case before granting relief.

Difference Between Judicial Separation and Divorce

Many people confuse judicial separation with divorce. However, both remedies are different.

In Judicial Separation:
• Marriage continues to exist.
• Husband and wife are legally permitted to live separately.
• Reconciliation remains possible.
• Neither spouse can remarry.

In Divorce:
• Marriage is legally dissolved.
• Parties cease to be husband and wife.
• Remarriage becomes legally permissible.

Why Choose Judicial Separation?

Judicial separation may be suitable where:

• The parties need time to reconsider their relationship.
• There is hope for reconciliation.
• The spouses are not ready for divorce.
• Continuous cohabitation has become difficult due to disputes and conflicts.

The remedy provides legal protection while allowing both parties an opportunity to reflect upon their future.

Effect of a Decree of Judicial Separation

Once the Court grants a decree of judicial separation:

• The parties are no longer bound to live together.
• Marital rights and obligations are modified according to law.
• Reconciliation can still take place voluntarily.
• Continued non-resumption of cohabitation may later become a ground for divorce.

Conclusion

Judicial Separation is an important legal remedy under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. It acts as a middle path between continuing an unhappy marriage and seeking divorce. The law recognizes that every marital dispute does not require immediate dissolution of marriage and therefore provides spouses with an opportunity to live separately while preserving the marital relationship.

Individuals facing matrimonial disputes should understand their legal rights and consult a qualified legal professional before taking any legal action.

Adv. Gurjant Singh
District & Sessions Court, Hisar