Akhil Sabharwal

Akhil Sabharwal Advocate
Delhi, India

16/04/2026

NC/CC/399/2014
HS Bhullar & Anr v Jaguar Land Rover & Ors

₹5 crore claim… gone in seconds because data doesn’t lie 😳⚖️

A high-end Jaguar Land Rover car crashes into a nilgai.
Driver says: “Airbag didn’t open = defect.”
But the car had its own version of the truth 💻

Crash data (RCM) revealed something unexpected 👇
Driver ✔️ seatbelt on
Passenger ❌ seatbelt off

And that changed everything.

Because airbags don’t deploy randomly — they follow impact logic + sensor inputs. In this case, the system calculated that driver-side deployment wasn’t required 🤯

Result?
No defect proved.
₹5 CRORE claim = dismissed.

And this isn’t the first time tech has flipped a case…

• In multiple global crash disputes, event data recorders (EDR) have been used to show actual speed, braking & seatbelt status 🚗
• Courts have relied on vehicle data to reject claims where human error was hidden behind “manufacturing defect” arguments
• Even in insurance battles, black-box data has exposed false narratives more than eyewitnesses ever could

Moral of the story?
Your car remembers everything… even when you don’t 👀

So next time you blame the machine — ask yourself,
what will the data say?

What’s your opinion on this judgment? Fair or questionable? 🤔👇

15/04/2026

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1807 OF 2019
SIVAKUMAR VERSUS STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

Ek word… aur pura case palat gaya 👀⚖️

Supreme Court ne clear kar diya — har gaali ya vulgar language crime nahi hoti.
Agar usme sexual ya lustful element nahi hai, toh Section 294 IPC (obscenity) apply nahi hota ❌

“Bastard” jaisa word offensive ho sakta hai… par law ke hisaab se obscene nahi 👀

Aur courts pehle bhi yeh line draw kar chuke hain —
👉 Intent matters more than just words
👉 Context decides legality

Toh next time jab koi bole “yeh illegal hai”… maybe picture thodi aur deep hai 😉

Aap kya sochte ho — gaali ko crime maana chahiye ya free speech? 💬

06/04/2026

Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 7049/2025
WAJID ALI @ TINKU v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

What if the biggest weapon in a drug case isn’t the recovery… but the procedure? 👀⚖️

In NDPS cases, courts don’t just look at what was seized — they look at how it was handled. And here’s the twist: even a small delay in sending samples to the FSL can shake the entire foundation of the prosecution’s case 💥

Why? Because the moment procedure breaks, doubt enters.
And in criminal law, doubt = advantage for the accused

From cases like Wajid Ali @ Tinku to multiple High Court rulings, one thing is clear:
📌 Chain of custody isn’t a formality — it’s the backbone
📌 Delays raise questions of tampering, substitution, and authenticity
📌 And once credibility cracks… bail and even acquittal become real possibilities

This is where law gets interesting 🤯
Sometimes, it’s not the evidence that fails — it’s the process behind it

So next time you hear about a “strong NDPS case”, ask yourself:
Was the procedure strong enough too? 🧠⚖️

03/04/2026

CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. DC/83/CC/122/2023
Shan Mohammed v. Apple India

Your phone says it can still be found… but what if reality says otherwise? 📱👀
One user trusted a feature, lost his device, and ended up in court — not for the phone, but for the promise attached to it ⚖️

When tech claims create expectations but don’t deliver clarity, it’s not just frustration… it becomes a legal issue 🚨
The court made it clear — incomplete information + confusing messaging = deficiency in service 💥

And this isn’t the only time brands have faced heat 👇
📌 In cases against Amazon India, misleading product listings led to refunds & penalties
📌 Flipkart has faced action over fake/defective deliveries
📌 Even MakeMyTrip saw complaints for hidden charges & unclear policies

Moral of the story? 🧠
Big brands ≠ zero responsibility
If you promise something, you better explain it clearly 🔍

So next time you rely on a feature… double check what’s actually ON ⚠️
Because one small assumption can turn into a big legal win 💸

25/03/2026

A registered will carries value — but it is not conclusive proof of genuineness.
Andhra Pradesh High Court reiterates:
Authenticity must be independently established.

Address

216, Block/3 Subhash Nagar
Delhi
110027

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Akhil Sabharwal posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share

Category