T S S India & Associates

T S S India & Associates T.S.S. ATUL SINGH heads the Dispute Resolution & Litigation practice areas of the Firm. Besides, he is
responsible for Tax Litigation practice as well.

INDIA is a Legal Firm stands as India's Premier Law Firm, offering a comprehensive range of
legal services at Pan India Headquartered at Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, India. Atul Singh, after completing his Bachelor in Science did bachelor in law in 2018 and also scored NCC
military trained ‘C’ certificate thereafter, he was enrolled with the Bar council of Delhi in 2019. He is a
seasoned and regarded

lawyer and enjoys command in appearing before various Courts, strategizing
litigation cases and providing exhaustive litigation strategic advice, drafting all pleadings, supervising
cutting edge research work, case preparation, planning optimum and result oriented procedures to be
followed in each and every case andin briefing Counsels. Besides being a technical master, Atul Singh possesses an outstanding ability to withstand great amount
of pressure and at the same time thinking practically to work out the situation at hand. Replete with selfconfidence and organizational skills and a knack for developing and channelizing human resources, Atul
Singh provides ready, swift and honest solutions to wide-ranging complex legal matters. T.S.S INDIA& ASSOCIATES
 DISPUTE RESOLUTION BEFORE JUDICIAL FORUMS/COURTS
 Handled various matters before the Hon’ble High Courts of Judicature at Delhi, Jodhpur and
Allahabad; as well as various Tribunals, etc.
 Appearing regularly before various District courts of Delhi, UP, Rajasthan, Haryana and Chandigarh
including tribunal like Consumer Commissions.
 Dealt in various issues pertaining to Contractual Disputes, Matrimonial Disputes, Insurance Claims,
Commercial Dispute, Recovery Proceedings, Property Laws, Succession and various Tortious Claims,
etc.
 AREAS OF EXPERTISE
 Mediation and Alternate Dispute Resolution
 Civil and Criminal Matters of White Collar Nature
 Negotiable Instrument Matters
 Matrimonial Disputes and Reliefs.
 Consumer & Product Liability Disputes
Before taking up Partner position with our Firm, Atul Singh was associated with the following firms:
“Arun Sheoran & Associates & Nitesh Tyagi & Associates”.
 Atul Singh holds following prestigious professional affiliations:
 Member of Delhi High Court Bar Association.
 Member of Delhi Bar Association.
 Member of Shahdara Bar Association. ATUL BHARDWAJ
Partner – Corporate, Taxation, Accounts & GST.
+91 7017092986
[email protected]
ATUL BHARDWAJ heads the Corporate and Taxation practice areas of the Firm. Atul Bhardwaj, after completing his Bachelor in Commerce did bachelor in law in 2018 and he was
enrolled with the Bar council of Delhi in 2019 and presently is a Corporate Tax Lawyer as well as
expert in managing and handling Accounts & GST with over 5 years’ professional experience in
Corporate & Commercial laws, Taxation, Legal &Tax Due Diligence etc. Atul Bhardwaj has extensive experience of working on Transactions/Corporate Structuring, structuring,
negotiation and drafting of various types of Commercial Contracts/Agreements including commercial and
Tax litigation matters etc for various large transnational and Indian clients. He has advised clients
from various sectors like -Private Equity; Manufacturing; FMCG; Professional Services; Print, Electronic
& Digital Media; Logistics and IT etc. Besides, Atul Bhardwaj also has extensive experience of working on Direct and indirect tax nationally
taxation advisory projects, litigation support and tax reviews/due diligence for various large multinational
and Indian clients. He has top quality experience of appearances before tax adjudication and appellate
authorities including ITAT, CESTAT and High Court and Supreme Court. T.S.S INDIA& ASSOCIATES
During years 2017-22, Atul Bhardwaj lead an advisory team of lawyers (from law firm B.K. Kansal)
which advised various clients on various aspects of undertaking reforms in Indian corporate and Tax laws
and laws regarding closing of business in India which has now culminated in new Insolvency &
Bankruptcy Code. During the advisory assignment, conducted comprehensive study of National best practices, prepared
concept notes, conducted presentations before the Committee in formulating the overall Conceptual
Framework. Before taking up Partner position with our Firm, Atul Bhardwaj was associated with the following firm in
senior partner capacities:- ”B.K. Kansal & Advocates”.
 Atul Bhardwaj holds following professional memberships/accreditations:
 Enrolment with Bar Council of Delhi
 Member of Delhi Bar Association

दहेज केस में सुप्रीम कोर्ट का बड़ा फैसलाSupreme Court of India ने हाल ही में साफ कर दिया है कि सिर्फ पत्नी और उसके परिवा...
19/04/2026

दहेज केस में सुप्रीम कोर्ट का बड़ा फैसला

Supreme Court of India ने हाल ही में साफ कर दिया है कि सिर्फ पत्नी और उसके परिवार के बयान के आधार पर उन्हें “दहेज देने” के अपराध में आरोपी नहीं बनाया जा सकता।

👉 कोर्ट ने कहा कि Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 की धारा 7(3) पीड़ित पक्ष को सुरक्षा देती है।
👉 यानी अगर पत्नी ने दहेज देने की बात कही है, तो उसी बयान के आधार पर उसके खिलाफ FIR नहीं हो सकती।

💡 यह फैसला दहेज कानून के सही इस्तेमाल और पीड़ित की सुरक्षा के लिए बेहद अहम है।


404 civil wing

हेलमेट न पहनना = स्वतः लापरवाही नहीं: मद्रास हाईकोर्ट ⚖️Madras High Court ने स्पष्ट किया कि सिर्फ हेलमेट न पहनना contrib...
17/04/2026

हेलमेट न पहनना = स्वतः लापरवाही नहीं: मद्रास हाईकोर्ट ⚖️

Madras High Court ने स्पष्ट किया कि सिर्फ हेलमेट न पहनना contributory negligence नहीं है, जब तक यह साबित न हो कि उससे दुर्घटना हुई या उसका प्रभाव बढ़ा।

Case Snapshot
बस की लापरवाही से दुर्घटना
मृतक ने हेलमेट नहीं पहना था
Tribunal: 93% बस चालक, 7% मृतक
High Court Ruling

Bench of Justice N. Anand Venkatesh & Justice K. K. Ramakrishnan held:

-> Helmet violation ≠ automatic negligence
-> Causal link जरूरी है
-> Compensation ₹28.85 lakh upheld

Result

✔ Appeal dismissed
✔ Tribunal award confirmed

Takeaway

Violation alone is not enough causation matters.

indianlaw courtjudgment legalawareness knowyourrights lawyersofinstagram caselaw atulsinghsejwal tssindiaandassociates tssindiaonline
404 civil wing

Live-In Relationships Get Constitutional Protection : Delhi High Court Landmark OrderIn a significant and progressive ru...
14/04/2026

Live-In Relationships Get Constitutional Protection : Delhi High Court Landmark Order
In a significant and progressive ruling, the Delhi High Court reaffirmed that two consenting adults have the fundamental right to live together, irrespective of their marital status.
Case Spotlight
Meena Akhilesh Yadav & Anr. vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi (2026)
Before Justice Saurabh Banerjee, the petitioners approached the Court seeking police protection from threats posed by the woman’s husband and family.
Key Facts

Both individuals are adults and entered into a live-in relationship by choice

The woman alleged continuous harassment by her husband since 2016

Threats escalated, forcing them to relocate from Hyderabad to Delhi

Despite representations to authorities, no action was taken

What the Court Said 🧑‍⚖️
The Court made it crystal clear:
👉 Article 19 & 21 of the Constitution protect personal liberty and life
👉 Marital status is irrelevant when it comes to fundamental rights
👉 Consenting adults have the right to choose their partner and cohabit
The Court emphasized that:

Protection of life and liberty is paramount societal or familial disapproval cannot override constitutional rights.

Relief Granted ✅

Petitioners allowed to seek immediate police protection

SHO and local police directed to provide assistance whenever required

Directions issued for continued protection even if residence changes

Why This Matters
✔ Strengthens legal recognition of live-in relationships
✔ Reinforces individual autonomy over societal norms
✔ Sends a strong message against honour-based threats and coercion
✔ Upholds the spirit of constitutional morality

Takeaway
This judgment is another step towards a more progressive legal system where choice, dignity, and personal freedom prevail over social stigma.


404 civil wing

Bail Granted in Section 69 BNS Case: Courts Reinforce Distinction Between Consent and DeceitToday, bail was successfully...
10/04/2026

Bail Granted in Section 69 BNS Case:

Courts Reinforce Distinction Between Consent and Deceit
Today, bail was successfully secured for the accused in a case under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), dealing with allegations of sexual relations on a false promise of marriage.

The Hon’ble Court granted bail after noting key factors:
The complainant was a mature and educated woman
She voluntarily travelled and booked the hotel
The relationship appeared consensual in nature
No criminal antecedents of the accused
Investigation substantially completed, no need for custody
The case highlights a crucial legal principle:
A failed relationship does not automatically amount to a criminal offence.
To attract Section 69 BNS, there must be clear dishonest intention from the very beginning, which was not evident here.
This order reinforces that consent, conduct, and surrounding circumstances play a decisive role, and that bail remains the rule, not the exception.

पाइप्ड नेचुरल गैस (PNG) उपभोक्ताओं के लिए घरेलू LPG सिलेंडर रखने पर रोककेंद्र सरकार ने एक महत्वपूर्ण आदेश जारी करते हुए ...
15/03/2026

पाइप्ड नेचुरल गैस (PNG) उपभोक्ताओं के लिए घरेलू LPG सिलेंडर रखने पर रोक
केंद्र सरकार ने एक महत्वपूर्ण आदेश जारी करते हुए कहा है कि जिन घरों में पाइप्ड नेचुरल गैस (PNG) कनेक्शन उपलब्ध है, वे अब घरेलू LPG सिलेंडर का कनेक्शन नहीं रख सकेंगे और न ही उसका लाभ ले सकेंगे।
सरकार के अनुसार, जिन उपभोक्ताओं के पास पहले से PNG कनेक्शन है, उन्हें घरेलू LPG कनेक्शन सरेंडर (वापस) करना होगा। यह कदम संसाधनों के बेहतर उपयोग, सब्सिडी के दुरुपयोग को रोकने और गैस वितरण प्रणाली को सुव्यवस्थित करने के उद्देश्य से उठाया गया है।
यदि कोई उपभोक्ता PNG कनेक्शन होने के बावजूद घरेलू LPG सिलेंडर का उपयोग करता पाया जाता है, तो उसके विरुद्ध कार्रवाई की जा सकती है।

बिना पुलिस रिपोर्ट के शांति भंग की कार्यवाही नहीं! - इलाहाबाद हाईकोर्टहाल ही में Allahabad High Court ने एक महत्वपूर्ण फ...
10/03/2026

बिना पुलिस रिपोर्ट के शांति भंग की कार्यवाही नहीं! - इलाहाबाद हाईकोर्ट

हाल ही में Allahabad High Court ने एक महत्वपूर्ण फैसला देते हुए स्पष्ट किया कि शांति भंग (Peace Bond) की कार्यवाही में व्यक्ति को पुलिस रिपोर्ट और संबंधित दस्तावेज देना अनिवार्य है।

केस: Brijesh Kumar Singh vs State of U.P. and Others

मामले में एसडीएम द्वारा Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 की धारा 126/130 BNSS के तहत नोटिस जारी कर व्यक्ति से ₹1,00,000 का पर्सनल बॉन्ड और दो जमानतदार देने को कहा गया था।

लेकिन समस्या यह थी कि नोटिस के साथ पुलिस रिपोर्ट की कॉपी नहीं दी गई, जिसके आधार पर यह कार्रवाई शुरू की गई थी।

न्यायमूर्ति Justice Dinesh Pathak ने कहा:

✔ जिस आधार पर कार्यवाही शुरू की गई है उसकी पुलिस रिपोर्ट और दस्तावेज आरोपी को देना जरूरी है
✔ तभी वह सही तरीके से अपना जवाब दाखिल कर सकता है
✔ बिना दस्तावेज दिए कार्यवाही करना प्राकृतिक न्याय के सिद्धांत के खिलाफ है

📌 कोर्ट ने आदेश दिया:
• 15 दिनों के भीतर पुलिस रिपोर्ट उपलब्ध कराई जाए
• उसके बाद आरोपी को जवाब दाखिल करने का अवसर दिया जाए
• तब तक कोई coercive action नहीं लिया जाएगा

यह फैसला महत्वपूर्ण है क्योंकि कई बार शांति भंग की कार्यवाही को निजी विवादों में दबाव बनाने के लिए इस्तेमाल किया जाता है।

















ATUL SINGH SEJWAL

प्रथागत तलाक (Customary Divorce) का दावा केवल कथन से नहीं, बल्कि ठोस साक्ष्य से सिद्ध होना आवश्यक है।”Delhi High Court न...
09/03/2026

प्रथागत तलाक (Customary Divorce) का दावा केवल कथन से नहीं, बल्कि ठोस साक्ष्य से सिद्ध होना आवश्यक है।”

Delhi High Court ने Smt. Sushma vs Sh. Rattan Deep & Anr (28 नवंबर 2025) में यह स्पष्ट किया कि यदि कोई व्यक्ति यह दावा करता है कि उसका पूर्व विवाह समुदाय की प्रथा (custom) के अनुसार पंचायत द्वारा समाप्त हुआ था, तो उसे उस प्रथा के अस्तित्व और वैधता को मजबूत साक्ष्यों से साबित करना होगा।

केवल एक आपसी समझौता (agreement) या कुछ गवाहों के बयान से प्रथागत तलाक सिद्ध नहीं माना जाएगा।

यदि पूर्व विवाह विधिक रूप से समाप्त नहीं हुआ है, तो बाद में किया गया विवाह **Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 की धारा 5(i) के उल्लंघन में माना जाएगा और वह विवाह धारा 11 के तहत शून्य (Void) घोषित किया जा सकता है।

कानूनी निष्कर्ष:
Customary divorce एक अपवाद है, इसलिए इसे सिद्ध करने का भारी दायित्व उसी व्यक्ति पर होता है जो इसका दावा करता है।


ATUL SINGH SEJWAL

थाने में क्या हुआ छिपेगा नहीं!मांगने पर पुलिस को CCTV फुटेज पेश करनी होगीभारत में पुलिस हिरासत में पारदर्शिता और जवाबदेह...
09/03/2026

थाने में क्या हुआ छिपेगा नहीं!
मांगने पर पुलिस को CCTV फुटेज पेश करनी होगी

भारत में पुलिस हिरासत में पारदर्शिता और जवाबदेही सुनिश्चित करने के लिए Supreme Court of India ने एक महत्वपूर्ण फैसला दिया।

केस: Paramvir Singh Saini v. Baljit Singh

सुप्रीम कोर्ट के प्रमुख निर्देश:
-->सभी पुलिस स्टेशनों में CCTV कैमरे लगाना अनिवार्य
-->लॉकअप, पूछताछ कक्ष, प्रवेश और निकास स्थान कवर होंगे
--> CCTV फुटेज कम से कम 18 महीने तक सुरक्षित रखी जाएगी
-->शिकायत या जांच होने पर फुटेज को सबूत के रूप में पेश करना होगा

क्यों महत्वपूर्ण है यह फैसला?
यह निर्णय कस्टोडियल टॉर्चर, अवैध हिरासत और पुलिस दुरुपयोग को रोकने की दिशा में एक बड़ा कदम है।

निष्कर्ष:
अब अगर किसी व्यक्ति को पुलिस हिरासत में दुर्व्यवहार का आरोप है, तो CCTV फुटेज एक महत्वपूर्ण सबूत बन सकती है।
ATUL SINGH SEJWAL

Landmark Supreme Court Ruling on Maintenance in Void MarriagesIn Sukhdev Singh v. Sukhbir Kaur (2025 INSC 197), the Supr...
06/03/2026

Landmark Supreme Court Ruling on Maintenance in Void Marriages

In Sukhdev Singh v. Sukhbir Kaur (2025 INSC 197), the Supreme Court of India clarified an important issue under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Even if a marriage is declared void under Section 11, the spouse can still claim maintenance and permanent alimony under Sections 24 and 25 of the Act.

The Court held that the phrase “any decree” in Section 25 includes a decree declaring a marriage void. Therefore, a financially dependent spouse cannot be left destitute merely because the marriage is held invalid.

The Court also emphasised that maintenance is discretionary and depends on the facts, financial condition, and conduct of the parties.

Another important observation:
The Court strongly criticised the use of terms like “illegitimate wife” or “faithful mistress”, calling such language misogynistic and contrary to the dignity guaranteed under the Constitution.

Why this judgment matters:
it Resolves conflicting precedents,
it Protects financially dependent spouses and,
it Upholds dignity and constitutional values


ATUL SINGH SEJWAL

Landmark Case Judgment that changed how courts deal with FIR quashing in India.The Supreme Court laid down important gui...
04/03/2026

Landmark Case
Judgment that changed how courts deal with FIR quashing in India.

The Supreme Court laid down important guidelines on when criminal proceedings can be quashed and clarified that if an FIR discloses a cognizable offence, the police must register the case and investigate.

What is a Cognizable Offence?
A serious offence where police can:
• Register FIR without court permission
• Arrest without warrant
• Start investigation immediately

Examples: Murder, r**e, kidnapping, theft, corruption offences.

📌 Why this case matters:
• Protects people from false criminal cases
• Prevents misuse of criminal law
• Guides High Courts while quashing FIRs
• One of the most cited judgments in criminal law

Every criminal lawyer relies on the Bhajan Lal Guidelines while filing or defending FIR quashing petitions.

Address

CHAMBER NO. 404, CIVIL WING, TIS HAZARI, DELHI
Delhi
110054

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when T S S India & Associates posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share

Category