Legal Experts India

Legal Experts India Visit us at www.legalexpertsindia.net

Lawyers | Arbitrators | Certified Public Procurement Expert

Legal Experts India is a full-service law firm in India, based at New Delhi with a Network of Lawyers practicing in other states. We support our clients in all spheres of law throughout India specifically Corporate Law, Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR), Family Laws, Matrimonial Laws, Civil & Criminal Laws. Our team is dedicated to provide success to our clients, with timely delivery, excellenc

e and cost effective legal services. Practice Area

Corporate & Commercial Law
Cyber Laws
Intellectual Property Law
Arbitration & ADR
Criminal Law
Family & Matrimonial Law

Permitting the filing of successive petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. ignoring this principle would enable an ingeniou...
01/11/2023

Permitting the filing of successive petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. ignoring this principle would enable an ingenious accused to effectively stall the proceedings against him to suit his own interest and convenience, by filing one petition after another under Section 482 Cr.P.C., irrespective of when the cause therefore arose. Such abuse of process cannot be permitted.
~Supreme Court of India

Case Title: Bhisham Lal Verma v State of Uttar Pradesh and another (2023 INSC 955)

The Kerala High Court has granted anticipatory bail to two lawyers accused of ra**ng their client when she had approache...
29/10/2023

The Kerala High Court has granted anticipatory bail to two lawyers accused of ra**ng their client when she had approached one of them to seek legal assistance in filing her divorce. Pertinently, while granting bail the bench was of the opinion that there is nothing in law that indicates that anticipatory bail cannot be granted for a serious offence such as r**e. The petitioners herein were alleged of the offences under Sections 376, 354, 120B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Case Title: M J Johnson v. State Of Kerala

Speedy Justice - In this pursuit, we call upon all stakeholders-the legal fraternity, the legislature, the executive, an...
27/10/2023

Speedy Justice - In this pursuit, we call upon all stakeholders-the legal fraternity, the legislature, the executive, and the citizens themselves-to join hands in a concerted effort to untangle the web of delay and pendency - We must streamline procedures, bolster infrastructure, invest in technology, and empower our judiciary to meet the demands of our time.

Yashpal Jain
Versus
Sushila Devi & Others

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Civil Appeal No.4296 of 2023.

“It is obvious that if the wife insists to stay with the husband and without any extraneous reason or official cause, if...
26/10/2023

“It is obvious that if the wife insists to stay with the husband and without any extraneous reason or official cause, if husband refuses to keep her it cannot be said to be a cruelty by the wife towards the husband for such insistence. During the matrimonial ties the reciprocal respect and regard to each other and the company is necessary. In absence thereof any forceful imposition of condition by either side may lead to a matrimonial disruption.”

Case Title- Kalyani Bai v. Tejnath @ Kejwaram Sahu

Citation : 2023:CGHC25684-DB

Law of Arbitration - Jurisdiction - Seat of Arbitration
14/09/2022

Law of Arbitration - Jurisdiction - Seat of Arbitration

Queries related to Matrimonial Law?I will be on- Air to answer all your queries/ questionsTune-in to Rainbow FM of All I...
01/09/2022

Queries related to Matrimonial Law?

I will be on- Air to answer all your queries/ questions

Tune-in to Rainbow FM of All India Radio on:

Date: 06th September 2022
Time: 12:00 Pm onwards

Topic: Matrimonial Disputes and their repercussions

Happy Independence Day
15/08/2022

Happy Independence Day

A Tenant can claim a Waiver/Suspension of Rent only when the Contract contains a clause providing for the same : Delhi H...
03/08/2022

A Tenant can claim a Waiver/Suspension of Rent only when the Contract contains a clause providing for the same : Delhi High Court
Case:Siddhatha Singhvs Ajit Singh Bawa (Deceased) Through Lrs

Citation: RFA(COMM) 40/2022 & CM APPL.26156-158/2022

Once Arbitration Clause mentions name of the Arbitral Institution, no need to name the Arbitrator.Karnataka High Court i...
01/08/2022

Once Arbitration Clause mentions name of the Arbitral Institution, no need to name the Arbitrator.

Karnataka High Court in Civil Misc. Petition 52 of 2021

25/07/2022

Legal Development

Centre issues ‘Guidelines on Prevention of Misleading Advertisements and Endorsements for Misleading Advertisements, 2022’ _These guidelines shall apply to all advertisements regardless of form, format or medium and shall be in addition to and not in derogation of, such regulation in other laws._

Guidelines aims at protecting consumers from misleading advertisements and protect the consumers’ right

*CCPA may charge penalty of Rs 10 lakh and for subsequent contravention, Rs 50 Lakh for violation*

The Central Consumer Protection authority (CCPA) under the Department of Consumer Affairs has notified ‘Guidelines for Prevention of Misleading Advertisements and Endorsements for Misleading Advertisements, 2022’ with an objective to curb misleading advertisements and protect the consumers, who may be exploited or affected by such advertisements.

The guidelines seek to ensure that consumers are not being fooled with unsubstantiated claims, exaggerated promises, misinformation and false claims. Such advertisements violates various rights of consumers such as right to be informed, right to choose and right to be safeguarded against potentially unsafe products and services.

The CCPA has been established under section 10 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 for regulating matters relating to violation of the rights of the consumers, unfair trade practices and false or misleading advertisements which are prejudicial to the interests of public and consumers and to promote, protect and enforce the rights of consumers as a class.

In exercise of the powers conferred by section 18 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, to CCPA, the Guidelines were notified

Misleading advertisement has already been defined under section 2(28) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

The present guidelines define “bait advertisement”, “surrogate advertisement” and clearly provides what constitutes as “free claim advertisements”.

Keeping in view the sensitiveness and vulnerability of children and severe impact advertisements make on the younger minds, several preemptive provisions have been laid down on advertisements targeting children. Guidelines forbid advertisements from exaggerating the features of product or service in such manner as to lead children to have unrealistic expectations of such product or service and claim any health or nutritional claims or benefits without being adequately and scientifically substantiated by a recognized body. Guidelines says that advertisement targeting children shall not feature any personalities from the field of sports, music or cinema for products which under any law requires a health warning for such advertisement or cannot be purchased by children.

Disclaimers in advertisements play a pivotal role from consumer perspective since, in a way it limits the responsibility of the company. Therefore, guidelines stipulates that disclaimer shall not attempt to hide material information with respect to any claim made in such advertisement, the omission or absence of which is likely to make the advertisement deceptive or conceal its commercial intent and shall not attempt to correct a misleading claim made in an advertisement. Further, it provides that, a disclaimer shall be in the same language as the claim made in the advertisement and the font used in a disclaimer shall be the same as that used in the claim.

Similarly, clear Guidelines are laid for duties of manufacturer, service provider, advertiser and advertising agency, due diligence to be carried out before endorsing and others. Guidelines aims to protect consumer’s interest through bringing in more transparency and clarity in the way advertisements are being published, so that, consumers are able to make informed decisions based on facts rather than false narratives and exaggerations.

Penalty for violating the Guidelines are also clearly outlined. CCPA can impose penalty of upto 10 lakh rupees on manufacturers, advertisers and endorsers for any misleading advertisements. For subsequent contraventions, CCPA may impose a penalty of upto 50 lakh rupees. The Authority can prohibit the endorser of a misleading advertisement from making any endorsement for upto 1 year and for subsequent contravention, prohibition can extend upto 3 years.

The Guidelines can be viewed at

https://consumeraffairs.nic.in/sites/default/files/file-uploads/latestnews/CCPA%20Notification.pdf

Source https://pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1832906

In a significant judgment disapproving gender-based stereotypes, the Supreme Court held that the condition imposing a ge...
20/02/2022

In a significant judgment disapproving gender-based stereotypes, the Supreme Court held that the condition imposing a gender cap as to the number of women or men, who can perform in orchestras and bands, in licenced bars, is unconstitutional.
While the overall limit of performers in any given performance cannot exceed eight, the composition (i.e., all female, majority female or male, or vice versa) can be of any combination, the Court clarified, while allowing the appeal filed by a hotel challenging the restrictions imposed by Mumbai Police

(Hotel Priya, A Proprietorship v State of Maharashtra and others). [Decided on 18th February' 2022]

The Court observed that the restriction capping the number of women performers emanated from gender-based stereotypes.

"Practices or rules or norms are rooted in historical prejudice, gender stereotypes and paternalism have no place in our society", the bench comprising Justices KM Joseph and S. Ravindra Bhat observed. The court added that such restrictions limit or exclude altogether women's choice of their avocation.

"Such measures – which claim protection, in reality are destructive of Article 15 (3) as they masquerade as special provisions and operate to limit or exclude altogether women's choice of their avocation", the Court noted.

"..recent developments have highlighted areas hitherto considered exclusive male "bastions" such as employment in the armed forces, are no longer so", the Court noted.

The Mumbai Bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) temporarily restrained the Mumbai International Airport Ltd...
15/02/2022

The Mumbai Bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) temporarily restrained the Mumbai International Airport Ltd (MIAL) from removing Jet Airways’ assets from its premises, and directed it to allow the airline’s representatives, workmen and nominees, access to the airport premises.
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
COURT-I, MUMBAI BENCH
IA 292/2022 IN CP (IB) 2205/MB/2019
State Bank Of India vs Jet Airways

Address

Chamber No: 529, Lawyers Block, District Court Complex, Saket
Delhi
110017

Opening Hours

Monday 10am - 6pm
Tuesday 10am - 6pm
Wednesday 10am - 6pm
Thursday 10am - 6pm
Friday 10am - 6pm
Saturday 10am - 6pm

Telephone

+919811693124

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Legal Experts India posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Legal Experts India:

Share