SOLZ Yes, you'r at the right place

29/05/2020

The plea was filed by a Delhi-based man.

28/05/2020

Constitutional News CourtsSupreme Court
PIL filed in Supreme Court seeking reduction of non COVID-19.

A Public Interest Litigation is filed in the Supreme Court of India seeking directions to the Government of India, all the State Governments, all the Union Territory Governments and other concerned authorities to take immediate steps to relax / reduce non-covid-19 related medical healthcare treatment services at all public hospitals.

The petition is being filed by the Sourjya Das (petitioner in person) who is an Advocate and a member of Calcutta High Court Bar Association. The petitioner is also a freelance editor / columnist and provides pro-bono legal services to various ethnic communities or tribes across India and to financially weak citizens of India.

The petition states that the restrictions imposed on public life by the Government following the COVID-19 outbreak has hampered public life in such a way that the public does not know when things will get back to normal or when offices, shops and usual means of income would resume, thus financially empowering members of the public on a daily basis. It is necessary to consider that at such times, numerous members of the public will require non-covid-19 / non- coronavirus related medical treatment services like chemotherapy, emergency transplants, colonoscopy, various tests and other various prescribed medical treatments which are of immediate necessity to sustain the life of a member of the public.

Legal News India – India Legal brings you the Latest Law News, Latest Legal News, Daily Legal Updates India, Current Legal News, Today Legal News at India Legal.

13/03/2020

Hinduism is a democratic religion and a way of life, the Calcutta High Court remarked while dismissing a plea challenging the release of a Bengali mov

'Gag orders of the sort as prayed for would be a complete antithesis of the liberal principles of a democracy and a democratic religion like Hinduism.'

29/01/2020

The Supreme Court held that anticipatory bail is no more time bound like it used to be. It has an extention till the trial ends except in rare and peculiar cases. For filing the anticipatory bail one must place relevant and not fraudulent or vague points precisely and why he or she is of the apprehension of being arrested. This will have both a positive and negative effect on the society as the innocent will stay innocent and the perpetrator can buy some some more time and skip jail time for as long as they can.

21/12/2019

Bjp MLA Kuldeep Sengar is sentenced life imprisonment. He was accused of R**e, murder of a minor girl and his entire family. the honourable court yesterday passed judgement of convicting the accused person.

19/12/2019

The Apex Court while dealing with a criminbal case before it stating in the observation of the case that there must not be burial of facts in order for justice to prevail. The accused was charged for kidnapping a minor, r**e and murder. The accuse was convicted with death sentence by the trial court but upon appeal to the Supreme Court it waas found that '"the trial court on its own ought to have adjurned the matter for some time so that amicus curie could have had the advantage of sufficiant time to prepare the matter. The approach adopted by the trial court in our view may have expedited the conduct the trial, but did not furthur the cause of justice".

16/12/2019

The Citizen Amendment Bill (2019) (CAB) has gained the attention all throughout India once it was passed by the Rajiya Sabha on 16th December, 2019 and turned into an Act. This also had spread a wide chaos in parts all over India starting from Assam, West Bengal and so on. As stated under Section 2 sub - section (1) clause (b) of the Act which states that "Provided that any person belonging to Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi or Christian community from Afghanistan, Bangladesh or Pakistan, who entered into India on or before the 31st day of December, 2014 and who has been exempted by the Central Government by or under clause (c) of sub-section (2) of section 3 of the Passport (Entry into India) Act, 1920 or from the application of the provisions of the
Foreigners Act, 1946 or any rule or order made thereunder, shall not be treated as illegal migrant for the purposes of this Act". We all know that people are mis-interpreating the law and causing mayhem and frantic with terror and violance around few states.

People are also forgetting that just like its sometimes a good example to take justice into your own hands just as in the case of Priyanka Reddy but not in every case then things might turn for the worst. This is not conclusive and there is still scope for furthur amendments on this Act. This was required in order to control immegration and asylum for people from other far off nations.

15/12/2019

The High Courts all over India is finally coming around to adapt and implement the e-court services globally. Though some sites provides assistance like case details but there is always roomn for improvement as sometimes there is delay in retrieveing information or lack in maintaining database due to infestructural resources. But with this we can file complaints / petitions / writs effectively and promptly. Changes will finally take place in the justice matrix and finally entwine with the world wide web (www.) and effectively after long last and will provide swift reliefs to all around the world.

12/12/2019

The Supreme Court of India took yet a prompt action on the review cases that was filed before the hon'ble court regarding the Ayodhya land dispute case but which were all dismissed on the grounds that the cases that were filed lacked merits. On the earlier order that was passed stated that 2.7 acures of land were to be given to the hindus for the revival of Ram Mandir and taht 5 acures of land be handed over to the muslims for the construction of mosques in Ayodhya. This landmark judgement still stands as it was decided in the presence of a five-bench Judge alog with the Chief Justice of india Ranjan Gogoi which was decoided unanimouslyand to which the same order still stands.

09/12/2019

The Supreme Court made an observation in the case of M/S. Singal Udyog V. National Insurance Company Ltd. & Ors whereby it held that consumer forums / commissions cannot consider appeals / complaints once it has been barred by limitation even though it is on merits. The court however, accepted the delay of 150 days and mentioned that this cannot be rejected it on grounds of delay.

07/12/2019

The Supreme Court recently passed a judgement stating preliminary inquiry is not required or mandatory for registering an F.I.R (First Information Report).The Supreme Court quasing the order of state's High Court mentioned that it may be conducted in cases pertaining to matrimonial disputes, family disputes, commercial offebnces medical negligence, corruption cases etc. but that does not mean that proceedings cannot be initiated agaist the accused when it comes to filing of an F.I.R as it already consists the preliminary information necessary to start of with the investigation without any delay. Furthurmore, an F.I.R cannot quashed on the grounds that preliminary investigation did not take place. The only thing that is to be taken into account is the fact that the complaint is not based frivelously or is untebanle.