Ozg Lawyers, Bandra

Ozg Lawyers, Bandra Ozg Lawyers, Bandra

15/07/2025

When Anjali received a call from the local police, her heart raced. She was told to appear for questioning in relation to a corporate fraud case—shocking, because she had nothing to do with it. Confused and anxious, she called OZG Lawyers.

At OZG, Advocate Maya listened carefully. “Anjali, remember this—Article 20(3) of the Constitution of India protects you. You cannot be compelled to be a witness against yourself.”

Anjali’s eyes widened. “So I can stay silent?”

“Exactly,” Maya said - "The police can’t force you to confess. You have the right to remain silent and to have a lawyer present at all times. Say nothing that can be twisted later. Your silence is your shield.”

The next day, Anjali entered the interrogation room with Maya beside her. The officers asked sharp questions, trying to corner her. But guided by Maya, she calmly replied, “I choose not to answer without legal counsel.”

The session ended with no confession. No tricks worked. Later, it was revealed that the actual perpetrator was someone else entirely. Anjali had narrowly escaped being wrongly implicated—all because she asserted her fundamental right.

At OZG Lawyers, we believe in empowering citizens with knowledge. Knowing your rights isn’t just smart—it’s your legal armor.

✉️ [email protected]

Follow the Magna Carta 👑

10/06/2023

Directorate of Enforcement (ED) has provisionally attached 48 immovable properties worth Rs 60.44 Crore including flats/shops/lands etc belonging to Gilbert Baptist, his family members/aides and entities controlled by him in a financial fraud case related to diversion of depositors money in Malaika Multi State Credit Cooperative Society (MMCCS) under the provisions of PMLA, 2002.

ED initiated investigation on the basis of FIR and 2 chargesheets filed by the Mira Road Police Station of Maharashtra State Police.

ED investigation revealed that Malaika Multistate Credit Cooperative Society (MMCCS) was established in the year 2010 by Gilbert Baptist, Marceline Baptist. Later, Gilbert Baptist appointed various other dummy Directors of MMCCS. The society was run as a one man show by its Chairman Gilbert Baptist. All other members were following his instruction for day to day operations.. The investors were systematically lured to deposit their savings in multiple schemes, with promises of great returns. But, instead of investing the deposits of the innocent investors in secure businesses or instruments, Gilbert Baptist diverted majority of the funds to his own business ventures.

Gilbert Baptist had opened various business in the names of M/s Malaika Appliances Pvt Ltd (MAPL), Yasoma Industries, Yasoma Wedding Sarees and Malaika Starcity Project etc, which were run from the investments received from MMCCS. The financial auditors of MMCCS pointed out several irregularities during annual periodic audits which were ignored by Gilbert Baptist and his aides. No prudent financial norms for sanctioning loans were followed. The same reckless pattern was followed in his businesses also. He diverted the funds to create properties in the names of himself, his family, his associates, his businesses. His business ventures lost money and soon the accounts of MMCCS became NPA, resulting in losses to thousands of innocent investors. It is estimated that deposits worth Rs 200 Cr.

10/05/2023

The Liberalised Remittance Scheme is an RBI measure that allows Indian residents to send up to USD250,000 per financial year (April to March) outside India. These funds can be used for any permissible current or capital account transaction, or a combination of both.

Who is eligible to remit funds outside India under the LRS?

The LRS is for people who are residents of India as defined by the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA), 1999. It cannot be used by corporations, partnership firms, Hindu Undivided Family (HUF), trusts, etc.

What are the permissible current account transactions under the LRS?

The following are permissible current account transactions under the LRS:

🚩 Private visit (other than Nepal & Bhutan)

🚩 Gift or donation (including rupee gift) to a Non-Resident Indian (NRI) / Person of Indian Origin (PIO), who is a close relative

🚩 Emigration

🚩 Overseas business trip

🚩 Medical treatment abroad

🚩 Pursuing studies outside India

🚩 Going outside India for employment

🚩 Maintenance of close relatives abroad

FEMA Consultants | Ozg Lawyers | Email: [email protected]

Which capital account transactions are permissible under LRS?

The following are the permissible capital account transactions under LRS:

🚩 Opening a foreign currency account abroad with a bank outside India

🚩 Purchase of foreign property

🚩 Investments in overseas shares, securities, mutual funds, etc

🚩 Setting up wholly owned subsidiaries (WOS) or joint ventures (JV) abroad (subject to stipulated terms and conditions)

🚩 Extending INR loans to NRIs who are relatives as defined in the Companies Act.

What if I need to remit more than USD250,000?

You can remit more than the USD250,000 limit for emigration, medical treatment and overseas education, if it is required by the country of emigration, medical institute offering treatment or the university respectively, but this is subject to certain conditions. In other cases, you will need prior permission from the RBI

10/04/2023
ECB Restriction List -WhatsApp Chat ☎️ WA.me/918779696580👩🏻‍💼👨🏽‍💼 If you are a practicing professional then you can also...
05/11/2022

ECB Restriction List -

WhatsApp Chat ☎️ WA.me/918779696580

👩🏻‍💼👨🏽‍💼 If you are a practicing professional then you can also join to Ozg RBI Compliance Group having 4000+ registered members across the country. Fee: ₹180/Year.

Follow 💗 DM

💬 Support
Ozgian 24/7

👨‍⚖️ Litigation
Ozg Lawyers

📂 Filings
Ozg Documentation Centre

🏦 AD Bank
Ozg Finance (NBFC: ask @ ozgfinance.com) has service level association with 20+ top ranked pvt banks.

Link: Learn more @ ecb.fema.in

Ozg Lawyers: The #1 FEMA Advisory

**************************************

12/10/2022

The directed that no one should be prosecuted under of the Information Technology Act 2000, which was struck down as in 2015 🏡

📳 WA.me/918779696580

📱 cybercrime.ozg.in

  and   announced they have taken steps to standardize the input of the critical data about compliance by listed entitie...
07/09/2022

and announced they have taken steps to standardize the input of the critical data about compliance by listed entities.

💗 follow

📲 instagr.am/SEBIcompliance

🏠 facebook.com/SEBIcompliance



WhatsApp Chat📱WA.me/918850585672

27/08/2022

, &

In 2007, the promoters of New Delhi Television (NDTV), Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy made an offer to buy back shares from their existing investors. At first, the plan was to buy a 7.73% stake from another entity GA Global Investments. But this immediately triggered something called an open offer.

What is an open offer?

Well, according to capital market regulations, promoters (or any investor in general) have to abide by a few rules when they’re buying large chunks of a publicly listed company. One rule relates to minority shareholders.

If you’re a minority shareholder in a company holding a few hundred stocks, then you have every right to exit an investment if you believe a massive change in ownership structure could have an impact on the company’s future. This is why the regulator asks promoters (or investors) to make an additional open offer to minority shareholders when they buy a sizeable part of the company from certain select investors. The open offer will then allow you to sell your shares at a certain price and walk away from the investment if you so desire.

So when the Roy's bought back 7.73% of the company, they had to make an open offer to consummate this transaction. Unfortunately, they didn’t have the money. So to come good on the cash, they borrowed around ₹540 crores from Indiabulls Financial Services Limited by pledging NDTV shares as collateral.

But then, the global financial crisis changed the whole landscape. The value of NDTV shares collapsed and the collateral backing the loan lost most of its value. It’s likely that Indiabulls demanded to be repaid in full. So in October 2008, the promoters took another loan of ₹375 crores from Limited, in order to repay Services.

But the ICICI loan carried an interest rate of about 19%. It was getting desperate. This is when an unusual hero appears in the background— A lender by the name of Commercial Pvt. Ltd. (or VCPL). This company made out a loan to NDTV worth ₹350 crores on an interest-free basis, for the duration of 10 years. In return, NDTV had to offer VCPL something called a convertible warrant.

A convertible warrant is a financial instrument that will allow you to buy shares at a fixed price if certain clauses are met. So by owning the warrants, VCPL had an avenue to own a sizeable chunk of NDTV.

As we noted, these were desperate times and the promoters of NDTV didn’t have much of a choice. So they obliged. They held a ~29% stake in NDTV through a firm called RRPR Pvt Ltd. And they told VCPL that they would hand over the entire stake of RRPR in the form of warrants.

So in summary, the mystery entity VCPL came to own warrants in — and through it an avenue to own a 29% stake in NDTV.

But wait, who is VCPL — this mystery lender?

Okay, this is where things get interesting. See, VCPL was only set up in 2008. They don’t have a track record and it doesn’t seem as if they were dabbling with much else, except this one transaction — the loan made out to NDTV promoters.

But to get here, VCPL had to first borrow money from another entity — . And guess who owned ?

Reliance ( )!

So it meant that one of India’s largest conglomerates had a hand in NDTV (indirectly) all these years. But outside of that, not much has changed this past decade. Granted, Reliance washed its hands off VCPL and two other entities — and came to own the company. But the rumour is that the new owners still had some indirect ties to Reliance.

Until this week, when Adani went ahead and bought VCPL for ₹113 crores. And within minutes of announcing the deal, it dropped another bombshell. It noted that VCPL was exercising the warrants, which translated to a full ownership of RRPR. And a 29% stake in NDTV as a consequence.

Now if you are wondering why the people that once owned VCPL decided to sell to Adani, that's anybody’s guess. But what we do know is that this one transaction will now induce a chain reaction.

Remember how we said — “When somebody comes to own a massive chunk in a publicly listed company, that triggers an open offer?”

Well, Adani has to make an open offer of its own. Since they’re acquiring more than 29% of NDTV, they are mandated to make an offer to buy an additional 26% of the company from the other shareholders. This would give them a controlling stake of at least 51%.

So far Adani has stuck to the script. They made an open offer for ₹294 per share. But NDTV isn’t taking this indignity lying down. The company is fighting back.

On Thursday it filed a letter with the stock exchange detailing two very important points.

First, the company said that could only exercise the warrant after obtaining explicit consent from the promoters (which in this case never happened, according to the promoters).

Second, there’s a ban in place preventing NDTV’s founders from dealing in financial securities. A ban that was imposed in November 2020 because the promoters were found guilty of (buying or selling shares on the basis of privileged information that the general public didn’t have access to) under . But the ban will only be lifted by 26 November 2022. So NDTV believes that VCPL can only acquire the shares by overriding the ban. Which would require the regulator's approval.

But lawyers contend that it’s just a delaying tactic. And on Friday, Adani filed a counter suggesting that they acquired shares of NDTV by dealing with RRPR and not the promoters. They’re basically saying — “RRPR isn’t the entity being barred from dealing in securities. It’s Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy."

So it doesn’t see any reason why the deal shouldn’t be executed.

So what’s the option for NDTV?

The founders can still come to control NDTV if they made an open offer of their own. But to do this, they’d have to stump up several hundred crores and it’s unlikely Roys have this kind of money — unless another “Mystery lender” appears from out of nowhere.

Now bear in mind, Adani still hasn’t come to own a controlling stake in NDTV. The open offer is still open. And considering they made an offer at a discount, to the current market price, shareholders may not be tempted to sell their holding to . However, Adani may have a trump card.

There’s a foreign shareholder in — an entity that goes by the name LTS Investment Fund Ltd. They hold nearly 10% of the company.

But this fund has an unusual relationship with Adani. It seems almost 98% of the fund’s monies are invested in only 4 . So some reports argue that Adani could still come to own a controlling stake by buying out these large institutional holders at a bargain price.

So yeah, the saga isn’t over by any stretch of the imagination. But hopefully, now you have a better idea of what’s happening around you.



Go to: facebook.com/sebicompliance

🟣 Call Center 🟢 Backoffice 🟡 BPO WhatsApp Chat @ WA.me/918779696580Go to: ospcompliance.com and subscribe OSP Compliance...
24/06/2022

🟣 Call Center 🟢 Backoffice 🟡 BPO

WhatsApp Chat @ WA.me/918779696580

Go to: ospcompliance.com and subscribe OSP Compliance Solution for your Backoffice / BPO / Call Center to avoid any incidental risk or legal trouble e.g. an unwanted penalty and random police raid etc.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

DM📱 instagr.am/ospcompliance

Ozg legal compliance reporting can help OSPs clearly define, assess, and communicate their approach and control environment to their clients. Since the circumstances around each OSP relationship are unique, a leading OSP process leverages a tailored reporting approach that uses multiple reporting methods. By taking the necessary steps to identify the need for our assurance reporting and the appropriate reporting type, the OSP (and the associated users) can determine whether their risk and compliance needs are addressed.



Ozg Team conducts the following independent assessments of an organization’s tech infrastructure to establish if existing controls/processes meet management objectives and to demonstrate controls to customers and their auditors through reporting and integrated requirements.

📌 01. Telecom Compliance Advisory Services.

📌 02. Enterprise Voice & Unified Communications Design Review - Voice, Data & Network.

📌 03. Cloud and Foreign EPABX.

📌 04. Data Privacy Regulations.

📌 05. Telecom Compliance Solution Recommendations.

📌 06. OSP Intimation Services.

📌 07. Work from Home (WFH).

📌 08. Regulatory Updates.

📌 09. CRM Audit Services.

📌 10. TSP - Audit Services.

📌 11. DoT Audit Support Services.

📌 12. WPC compliance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go to: ospcompliance.com and subscribe OSP Compliance Solution for your BPO or Call Center to avoid any incidental risk or legal trouble e.g. an unwanted penalty and random police raid etc. WhatsApp @ WA.me/918779696580

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------



WhatsApp Chat @ WA.me/918779696580

Address

Bandra West
400050

Telephone

+918779696580

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Ozg Lawyers, Bandra posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Ozg Lawyers, Bandra:

Share