11/11/2015
The recent news that the conviction rate for drink driving convictions was about 40% left many practitioners scratching our heads. My experience, and that of my colleagues, is that the conviction rate is far higher. The vast majority of cases coming through the system result in a plea of guilty. Furthermore, not all of those that are contested result in an acquittal.
In my experience, most people enter a guilty plea because the members of An Garda Siochana have done their job correctly. As a practitioner, we look at the evidence, and if we do not see any holes in it, we will advise our clients accordingly.
Those that do get as far as hearing generally do so because we have spotted a flaw in the evidence. Then we run the case. That does not always guarantee success though; a judge might not side with you on an interpretation of the law, or the prosecuting garda might give perfect evidence.
So when we see headlines showing conviction rates of around 40%, we know that these are being written for a good headline or some political points scoring. The statistics were straight forward, and to represent them in any other way is purposely misleading.
One conversation that came about briefly with all of this is that Road Traffic Law should be consolidated. I think every practitioner would be in favour of this. Currently we work of many different legislative acts and amendments. Even for trained practitioners to trace the current law to find what it currently states can be quite trying. I do not know how a lay person could be expected to do that. However, we have heard talk of consolidating criminal legislation over the years, without any real end product, so, as much as I would like to see this development, I will not be holding my breath.
Commentary on 40% conviction rate ‘inaccurate’, according to courts service