Bonsai Law

Bonsai Law Bonsai Law is a next-generation Kent-based law firm helping clients with property and business needs.

“Can you make this contract bullet‑proof?”It’s one of the questions we hear most often at Bonsai – especially from found...
29/01/2026

“Can you make this contract bullet‑proof?”

It’s one of the questions we hear most often at Bonsai – especially from founders and SME owners who have either lived through a dispute or watched one swallow months of time, energy and cash.

The honest answer is: no.

No contract can make you dispute‑proof. It can’t stop a rogue personality on the other side deciding to behave badly, and it can’t insulate you from the kind of economic shocks we’ve all seen over the past few years – Brexit, Covid, wars and wider geopolitical chaos.

What a good contract can do is more modest and much more useful. It can:

Make the commercial deal genuinely clear.

Show you where the risk actually sits.

Reduce the room for sensible people to disagree.

Give you practical levers if (or when) things go wrong.

In our disputes and corporate teams, the nastiest fights we see rarely start with something that looks obviously “bad”. More often, they come from contracts that are:

Unclear – different people can read them in completely different ways.

Incomplete – key points were “parked for later” and never really nailed down.

Out of date – the wording no longer reflects how the parties actually work day‑to‑day.

Ignored – a beautiful document that no one follows in real life.

One recent example that stuck with us was a post‑completion dispute on an asset purchase.

The founder had copied an agreement from another deal and adapted it himself. On the surface, it looked impressive: dense wording, long schedules, lots of “belt and braces” language. It felt serious and “bullet‑proof” – the kind of thing you’d be proud to send across in a negotiation. No wonder the buyer was more than happy to sign.

But when you sat down and read it carefully, the price mechanics fell apart.

Most of the purchase price was supposed to be triggered by a particular event. On paper, it sounded clever and protective. In reality, the way the trigger was drafted meant that it could not – and would not – ever actually be satisfied. The condition was, in practice, impossible.

The result? The founder had accidentally built a structure where most of his own sale proceeds would never be payable. There was no fraud and no hidden trap. The contract itself had quietly made it impossible for him to get what he thought he’d sold the business for. By the time it reached us, we weren’t “fixing the wording”; we were trying to manage a dispute the wording had created.

From both the litigation and the corporate side, we see the same patterns again and again. The clauses that cause the most trouble in practice are rarely the ones people obsess over in negotiation. The real battlegrounds tend to be:

Governance and decision‑making (who can do what, and how deadlock is resolved).

Change, scope and price (what happens when reality drifts from the original plan).

Exit and termination (how people get out, and on what terms).

Remedies and liability (caps, exclusions, indemnities).

The “boring” boilerplate (jurisdiction, governing law, notices, entire agreement).

For SMEs and founders, chasing the mythical “bullet‑proof” document is usually the wrong goal. It is almost always better to have a clear, workable contract that everyone actually understands and can live with, than a 70‑page masterpiece no one has properly read.

A more useful way to look at contracts is to ask whether they’re “good enough” for the deal and the people in front of you. For us, that often comes down to three questions:

If this goes wrong, what actually happens – and can we live with that?

Are we genuinely comfortable with where the risk sits, given who we’re dealing with and the world we’re operating in?

Would a sensible outsider, reading this cold, understand what we think we’ve agreed?

If you can honestly answer “yes” to those, you are already a long way ahead of most.

If you’d like help understanding what you’re being asked to sign before you commit, or you want a sanity‑check on the wording, negotiation support or a re‑draft that reflects the real deal, our SME‑focused team can help. You can reach Vanessa Challess, Director of SME Services at Bonsai Law, at [email protected].

At Bonsai Law we agree with the Law Society’s stance on the government’s proposed overhaul of anti‑money laundering (AML...
22/01/2026

At Bonsai Law we agree with the Law Society’s stance on the government’s proposed overhaul of anti‑money laundering (AML) supervision.

What This Matters To You

Under the plans, AML supervision of law firms would move from the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), turning the FCA into a single supervisor for professional services.

For small and regional firms like ours, this is not a technical tweak – it risks:
- A second regulator in practice (FCA for AML, SRA for everything else), increasing overlap, uncertainty and regulatory time.
- Higher fixed compliance costs and new FCA fees which, inevitably, put upward pressure on what clients pay for everyday legal work.
- The loss of sector‑specific oversight grounded in legal professional privilege, duties to the court and the realities of solicitor–client relationships.

We have filed a detailed objection setting out these concerns. Our view is simple: effective AML is essential, but it must be proportionate, sector‑specific and compatible with access to justice. Strengthening the existing SRA‑based model would achieve far more for clients than adding another regulator and another layer of cost.

🌳 A lot of companies still rely on the articles alone to govern their relationship as shareholders – and that’s usually ...
21/01/2026

🌳 A lot of companies still rely on the articles alone to govern their relationship as shareholders – and that’s usually a mistake.

Here are 6 reasons to put a separate shareholders’ agreement (SHA) in place (and how Bonsai can help):

1️⃣ Privacy – Keep valuations, exit mechanics and veto rights out of public view instead of on Companies House. Bonsai drafts SHAs that protect what really needs to stay confidential.

2️⃣ Bespoke deal terms – Hard‑wire your actual commercial bargain (dividends, founder protections, investor consents) rather than forcing everything into the articles. Bonsai builds documents around the way you and your investors actually want to work.

3️⃣ Minority protection – Put vetoes, information rights, anti‑dilution and leaver mechanics in a clear SHA instead of contorting the articles. Bonsai can design balanced protections that reassure both founders and investors.

4️⃣ Harder to water down – Articles can be changed by 75%; an SHA usually needs all parties (or a high threshold) to amend. Bonsai structures your deal so key rights can’t be quietly diluted later.

5️⃣ Cleaner enforcement – An SHA is a straightforward contract claim between shareholders, making breaches easier to pursue than article‑only issues. Bonsai helps you get enforcement‑ready wording from day one.

6️⃣ Restrictive covenants – Robust non‑compete, non‑solicit and non‑poach obligations sit more naturally, and are more defensible, in an SHA than in public‑facing constitutional documents. Bonsai can calibrate those restrictions so they are commercial and enforceable.

If you (or your clients) are still relying solely on articles to manage shareholder dynamics, Bonsai can help you put proper SHAs in place.

👉 Drop me a message and I'll share how this can help you or your clients.

🌳 We’re really excited to say hello from Bonsai Law 🌳We’re a next-generation Kent-based law firm supporting founders, ow...
20/01/2026

🌳 We’re really excited to say hello from Bonsai Law 🌳

We’re a next-generation Kent-based law firm supporting founders, owner-managers and individuals with corporate, commercial, residential and commercial property matters – and resolving disputes when they arise.

Over the coming weeks we’ll share practical tips for running and protecting your business, navigating property transactions and avoiding costly disputes, plus news from the firm and our community.

If you’d like clear, pragmatic legal advice, you can reach us via www.bonsai.law or by messaging this page – and do give us a follow for updates and useful insights!

Bonsai Law is a Law Firm based in Kent. We deal with a variety of corporate, commercial and property law. Contact us for legal advice today.

Address

The Business Terrace, King Street
Maidstone
ME166JQ

Opening Hours

Monday 9am - 5pm
Tuesday 9am - 5pm
Wednesday 9am - 5pm
Thursday 9am - 5pm
Friday 9am - 5pm

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Bonsai Law posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share