Zane Malik QC

18/11/2021

R (on the application of AZ) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (statelessness "admissible") [2021] UKUT 284 (IAC):

The Upper Tribunal has reported its judgment in R (AZ) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (statelessness “admissible”) [2021] UKUT 284 (IAC). The issue before the Upper Tribunal... Read more »

02/11/2021

Rest in peace, Sibghat Kadri QC, Legend:

3 Paper Buildings (3PB) very sadly reported today that one of its senior and eminent barristers, Sibghat Kadri QC, who was Britain’s first-ever

01/11/2021

27/10/2021

https://www.39essex.com/the-court-of-appeals-judgment-on-toeic-and-appg-report/

The Court of Appeal (Lord Justice Underhill, Lady Justice Elizabeth Laing and Sir Nigel Davis) has handed down its judgment in Alam v Secretary of State for the Home Department... Read more »

15/10/2021

https://www.39essex.com/the-court-of-appeals-judgment-on-the-secretary-of-states-power-to-delay-decision-making-in-tier-1-applications/

The Court of Appeal (Lord Justice Moylan, Lady Justice Andrews and Lord Justice Lewis) has handed down its judgment in R (X) v Secretary of State for the Home Department... Read more »

15/10/2021

The Court of Appeal’s judgment in X v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWCA 148 (source of the power to delay decision-making, Parliamentary oversight and public law considerations).

Covid-19 Protocol: This judgment was handed down remotely by circulation to the parties' representatives by email and release to BAILII. The date for hand-down is deemed to be at 9.30am on 14th October 2021.

16/09/2021

https://www.39essex.com/the-court-of-appeals-judgment-on-meaning-of-in-time-in-rule-39e/

The Court of Appeal (Lady Justice Simler, Lord Justice Arnold and Lady Justice Andrews) has handed down its judgment in Secretary of State for the Home Department v Ali [2021]... Read more »

16/09/2021

The Court of Appeal’s judgment in Secretary of State for the Home Department v Ali [2021] EWCA Civ 1357 (interpretation of the phrase “in-time” in Paragraph 39E of the Immigration Rules):

Since application 2 was made within the time allowed for by the Immigration Rules in light of the disregard, it followed that it was an "in-time" application. Application 3 was made in-time under paragraph 39E(2) because it was made following the refusal of application 2 (which was itself in-time un...

26/03/2021

https://www.39essex.com/the-court-of-appeal-judgment-deportation-of-foreign-criminal-with-paranoid-schizophrenia/

The Court of Appeal (Lord Justice Dingemans, Lord Justice Lewis and Lady Justice Elisabeth Laing) has handed down its judgment in Secretary of State for the Home Department v Starkey... Read more »

26/03/2021

The Court of Appeal’s judgment in Secretary of State for the Home Department v Starkey [2021] EWCA Civ 421 (deportation of foreign criminal with paranoid schizophrenia):

15. Dr Nimmagadda was asked about the prognosis if the R were removed to South Africa 'where arguably he would not get the treatment therapy he requires'. His response was that the likely prognosis was poor, 'if he were not to receive the treatment therapy he requires'. He needed to be 'maintained o...

19/03/2021

https://www.39essex.com/supreme-courts-judgment-in-g-v-g-international-child-abduction-2021-uksc-9/

The Supreme Court (Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Hamblen, Lord Leggatt, Lord Burrows and Lord Stephens) hands down its judgment in G v G [2021] UKSC 9. The interveners in the appeal... Read more »

19/03/2021

Supreme Court gives judgment in G v G [2021] UKSC 9 (international child abduction and interplay between the 1980 Hague Convention and the 1951 Geneva Convention) and maintains the Court of Appeal’s order allowing the father’s appeal from the High Court:

THE COURT ORDERED that no one shall publish or reveal the name or address of the child who is the subject of these proceedings or publish or reveal any information which would be likely to lead to the identification of the child or of any member of her family in connection with these proceedings.