29/12/2021
The most common examples of the use of offshore companies in business
It is difficult to give the most common examples, although offshore territories are estimated to account for up to 30% of the world’s financial turnover. Take the world’s major financial institutions for example: banks, funds, investment and insurance companies – all have branches in at least one offshore zone, such as Switzerland, Luxembourg, Liechtenstein, Guernsey and Jersey of the Channel Islands, the Netherlands Antilles, the Cayman Islands, Bermuda, Hong Kong and Singapore. This is not surprising as these countries levy little or no tax on securities transactions.
Another popular way for a large business to ‘go offshore’ is to form a holding, i.e. to create an ownership structure which puts the offshore in the main (usually the top) position. If you look at the publicly available information on the ownership structure of a large production or trading holding, you will almost always see companies registered in Cyprus, Gibraltar or the British Virgin Islands at the top. In order to get a personal feel of ‘the presence of offshore in our lives’ you would simply need to take a closer look at the goods and products you buy. It is then that you will see the paper produced in the Isle of Man (where nothing but juniper has ever grown), strawberries from the British Virgin Islands (which makes you wonder how they have not gone bad after being transported through several time zones) and sunflower oil from the State of Delaware.
A real ‘Offshore Tale’ was the publication of leaks from the so-called Panama Papers (we will make a separate post about it). The impression a man in the street may get from it is that one in five officials, politicians or celebrities was connected with the offshore world in one way or another. And when it comes to business circles, it is simply impossible to find a tycoon who has not been busted using offshore structures.
However, even the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ), which published the leaked material, admits on its website that ‘there are legitimate uses for offshore companies’ and that being included in the ICIJ Offshore Leaks Database is not an indication that an individual, company or other entity ‘has broken the law or otherwise acted improperly’.