Visa Law Services

Visa Law Services Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from Visa Law Services, Lawyer & Law Firm, 161 Corporation Street, Birmingham.

06/07/2014

Types of UK visas

Tier 5 Temporary workers

Youth mobility scheme. If you are from Australia, Canada, Japan, New Zealand, Monaco or Taiwan, you can come to the UK on a 'working holiday' visa and experience life in the UK while working to pay your way.
>Creative and sporting. Artists, performers and sportspeople of international calibre can come to work in the UK
Charity and religious workers. For missionaries and unpaid charity workers
Government authorised exchange. For people coming under government-approved schemes aimed at the sharing of knowledge, experience and best practice.
International agreement. For people coming to the UK under contract to do work covered by international agreements, employments of international governments and private servants in diplomatic households

06/07/2014

Types of UK visas

Tier 4 student

Tier 4 student visas are for students at UK educational institutions. While studying, some students in states sponsored institutions are allowed to work up to 20 hours during terms times and full time during school breaks/ holidays while students in privately sponsored institutions may not have the right to work at any time.

06/07/2014

Types of UK visas

Tier 2 Skilled workers

Tier 2 (General) For workers who have an offer of skilled work and a certificate of sponsorship from a UK employer with a valid Tier 2 sponsorship licence. The job on offer must be one that cannot be filled by a worker already resident in the UK. Since 2011, there has been a cap of 20,700 visas that can be issue in this category every year
Tier 2 (Intra company transfer) For employees of multinationals who are being transferred to the UK branch, Applicants must have a valid certificate of sponsorship from their employer. There are four sub-categories
Long-term staff
Short-term staff
Graduate trainee
Skills transfer
Tier 2 (sportsman) For sportspeople of international calibre intending to stay in the UK for a lengthy period
Tier 2 (minister of religion) For missionaries, monks, ministers of religion and the like

06/07/2014

Types of UK visas

Tier 1; High value migrants

Tier 1 (Entrepreneur) For people with at least £50,000 to invest in the UK by taking over or setting up a UK business
Tier 1 (Investor) For people who want to invest in the UK and have at least £1m to invest in a UK investment opportunity
Tier 1 (Graduate Entrepreneur) For graduates of UK universities who are endorsed by their university. Limited to 2,000 a year.
Tier 1 (Exceptional Talent) Only open to truly exceptional people working in the arts and sciences. Limited to 1,000 a year

24/11/2013

Changing nature of life in the UK

There have been many changes recently, more so since the last elections.
UK has been ever changing. Some 6 years back there were fewer people in trains in London and more likelihood of passengers being able to find a seat to sit. All that has now changed, there are huge crowds everywhere and a reduced council / government involvement when it comes to maintaining public places and extending facilities. Pollution of all kinds, whether it is noise, smell and wastes, is ever increasing. Worst of all is the rents are shooting up like there is no tomorrow and the travel fares are even more expensive.

However, salaries have not gone up for the working class and employee rights are on a decline. The government seem to believe that to make people work harder the rich should be rewarded such as the bankers with bonuses and the poor should be paid less.

Britain is more divided today. Changes in the political line of thinking can have serious ramifications. The chancellor and the government are attempting to divide the society by categorising people in the country as either strivers or shirkers.

Today, you are considered as a striver if you are working and paying taxes but if things do not work your way and you lose your job in this difficult economic climate, then you are branded a shirker who lives on benefits, unwanted in the society, an enemy of the state, who is destined to be looked down and castigated. You will be the one who is accused of putting on the curtains to sleep indoors without trying or intending to find any job irrespective of whether it is suitable to your qualifications or experience.

The great political rich expects you to work shelving the stacks of some store like Poundland which will claim to give you an opportunity to gain some sort of weird professional experience without paying a penny, something you will not wish even for your enemies.
But there is no choice here, not anymore, as the government thinks you need to pay for the benefits you claim in some kind and even if it is slavery then so be it.

Exploitation and abuse of jobseekers and employees is ever growing. Employers are applying unfair terms to employment of graduates (to even those with some experience) by making them work for free in the initial few months in the name of unpaid but competitive internships, which are similar to Quidditch classes. These employers at times promise jobseekers a purported contract on a later date if they are up to the employer’s arbitrary set standards. HM Revenue & Customs has recently started investigating some of these employers.

Employees have much lesser legal rights now to fight against such injustice. An employee who joined employment after April 2012 and is unfairly dismissed cannot sue an employer if he / she had worked for less than two years, which used to be one year until April 2012. Further, from April 2013, the collective consultation period for large scale redundancies have been reduced to 45 days from 90.
In addition, there are plans in place to discourage Employment Tribunal claims itself; there is a new fee structure proposed for Employment Tribunal claims and ranges from approximately £ 250 for issuing a claim to £ 950 for a hearing.
Some people will not hesitate to support the parties implementing these plans, perceiving it as a matter of personal opportunism. Affluent people would not mind supporting parties who are closet racists or xenophobic as long as these parties ensure their interests and save them from heavy tax burdens. They do not care that it comes at the cost of making the poorest in the society pay for their miseries and their disadvantaged position in the society. It was once said, if you have one cow you vote for the labour but when you have two cows you vote for the conservatives but this has no relevance in the current day.

If you think the changes are outcome of who is governing the country alone then you may be wrong. Political parties have no significant policy differences anymore and there is only narcissism of small differences. Political ideology is compromised for the sake of vote bank politics and the ideology keeps changing with an eye on power, similar to a business trying to desperately sell its products to the consumers. There is heavy discounting, undercutting and schemes to lure the consumers, even though you may have not asked for, but you will still be surprised with a buy 1 and get 1 free coalition partner.

Whatever seems popular is immediately adopted and becomes policy of a political party. Every time the Home Secretary disgorges her hate filled policies and we see the labour party’s Shadow Home Secretary trying to better her. While leaving everyone to ponder, what does each of these parties stand for?
What is the point in having a different party? There is no party which speaks for the weaker sections of the society, since it is not in vogue anymore. It is all about winning the elections and principles do not matter. They are easily changed to best fit the majority perception.

In these difficult times, the country needs political parties (and individuals) who can keep their principles above any sort of power hungry and inconsistent behaviour pattern. Ideologies and principles above any sort of vote bank politics is need of the hour.

http://blog.hsmpforumltd.com/2013/05/04/changing-nature-of-life-in-the-uk.aspx

24/11/2013

Impact of discriminatory new changes on family lives of immigrants

In July 2012, the coalition government introduced a new set of rules that had a strong impact on family life. The rules required a British citizen or those settled in the UK to earn a specific income, if they wanted to invite their spouse and/or children, who were non-European nationals to join them in the UK.

The changes also introduced a new set of criteria which made it more difficult for those wanting to invite their non- EU parents as dependents. There is a new requirement that the parent should require care for their day to day needs. The threshold is particularly stringent because it does not just take into consideration financial dependency and age of the applicant (parent) but in addition requires them to have a minimum level of physical impairment or in need of care, and further that the required care is not available in their country of origin.

The changes are particularly unfair and irrational, because European nationals are subject to no such restrictions and would be able to bring in a non-European spouse without any income criteria but not a British citizen or permanent resident.
The irony of the changes is that it deprives citizens and permanent residents of the right to have a family life in the UK. This may just be because someone is earning couple of thousands lesser than the required earning of £ 18,600 and that person will never be able to invite his / her partner to the UK. Someone who has a widowed mother, who is old and fully dependant on her son / daughter in the UK and has no one to rely on in her country would still be unable to spend her time with her children during a crucial stage of her life.

Furthermore, the changes will definitely have a disproportionate impact on ethnic minorities. The Commission for Racial Equality earlier in 2007 pointed out when the previous government was enforcing earning thresholds that those who fall foul of high earning criteria are disproportionately from ethnic minorities. Apart from being victims of discrimination in the job market, they are likely to be victimised even further by these changes as they are deprived of a family life. This argument is further supported by the HSMP Forum’s judicial review judgments in 2008 and 2009.

Therefore, the available evidence only confirms that the majority of those who are / will be affected by these draconian changes will be those who emigrated from Asian and African countries and are permanent residents or have become British citizens (or children of those emigrated years back). This also takes into consideration the fact that non visa nationals may be able to find temporary consolation, as the partner or parent would be able to visit on temporary basis, unlike the difficulties for visa nationals. The government may waste no time in refusing even visitor visas for the latter based on speculation that they may not return to their country.

The changes seem to have been calculated to cause maximum impact on ethnic minority families and meant to make it very difficult for British citizens and permanent residents who are of Asian or African origin to continue to live in the UK. Some have approached the forum due to the distress the changes have caused and some say they may consider moving back to their country of origin due to their inability to sponsor their partner or bring their parent to the UK even though they will be able to maintain them without recourse to public funds. The outcome of these cold blooded and savage changes may mean some may be forced to uproot themselves yet again.

Even if someone fulfils the criteria, one is still faced with the numerous applications and inflated application fees required to attain settlement for a spouse; making the whole process economically burdensome for the immigrant families. Overall, the changes have unfairness written all over them.

http://blog.hsmpforumltd.com/2013/02/20/impact-of-discriminatory-new-changes-on-family-lives-of-immigrants.aspx

14/11/2013

Citizenship for sale: Malta sells EU passports for €650k

Malta is selling EU passports for 650,000 euro (US$875,000) or (£550,000) as part of a law passed in order to bring in cash and investment. It comes with the benefits of EU membership, including the right to reside and work in the 28-member bloc.
And those who purchase the passports can immediately bring in family members (including wife and children) to also become eligible for citizenship for just 25,000 euro ($33,600).

The plan, which was approved on Wednesday, is expected to begin within a week. It will give those who purchase the passports the right to reside in any of the other 27 member states. The new immigrant will even be immediately eligible to stand election as Parliament Member.

The island country, which has a population of 452,000, is a member of the EU and the Schengen borderless travel area, and has a visa waiver agreement with the US.

The country’s Prime Minister, Joseph Muscat, said the plan is expected to attract “high value” individuals from around the world who can then invest in the island. Muscat estimated that 45 potential applicants would raise the country around 30 million euro.

Henley and Partners, the company that will be in charge of processing the paperwork, estimated that the deal will attract up to 300 people annually.

The country’s opposition party has, however, heavily criticized the new law, stating that it will work to repeal it and revoke all the passports in the future. It also questioned the process of selling the passports, arguing that the vetting of individuals wanting to buy citizenship lacks transparency because their names will not be disclosed.

But European Union spokesman Michele Cercone said that Malta and other member states have the freedom to choose how and to whom they issue passports.

Other EU member states have been relaxing citizenship and residency rules for steep fees. For example, Cyprus eased citizenship rules for those who lost more than $3.2 million by paying the levy on savings, in an attempt to stop non-resident investors from leaving the country.

In the UK, residency permits are easier to obtain for non-EU citizens who have at least $1.6 million available for private investment in the UK. Meanwhile, Spain is planning on granting foreigners residency permits if they purchase a house for more than $215,000, in an attempt to boost the country’s housing sector.

04/11/2013

Immigration options for highly skilled migrants

US
The principal channel of highly skilled migration to the US is the H-1B visa. The visa is job-led and subject to an annual quota. The quota has been maintained at 65,000 since 2003. Foreign students graduating from a university in the US may apply to use the optional practical training (OPT) scheme, which can be attached to their student visa. If used, the OPT permits a foreign graduate to work in the US for up to a year.
Foreign nationals wanting to apply for US citizenship must first obtain a permanent resident card, also known as a green card. A migrant must have held green card status for a minimum of five years before they can apply for naturalisation. Although there is no minimum residence requirement for obtaining a green card, foreign nationals often find that their applications take years due to the complex and protracted nature of the process.

CANADA
Today skilled workers under the points-based system can be eligible for Canadian permanent residence. Although the scheme is not necessarily job-led, criteria related to a migrant’s occupation are at its core. Canadian immigration officials consider a migrant’s education, training, current and past employment, skills and experience to assess their suitability. Points are also awarded for language skills (English and/or French), age, and adaptability, which includes previous work or study in Canada, arranged employment, relatives residing in Canada, and a partner’s education.
Under the Post-Graduation Work Permit Program, foreign students who have graduated from a Canadian university can apply for a non-job-led work permit within 90 days of graduation. The programme, which was subject to an expansion in April, now allows graduates to remain for up to three years.
The Canadian Experience Class will cater for certain temporary foreign workers and foreign student graduates with managerial, professional, technical or trade work experience, allowing them to apply to become permanent residents and eventually Canadian citizens. All applicants, depending on their occupational skill level, will be required to demonstrate either basic or moderate language skills.
As a general rule, a foreign national wishing to naturalise as a Canadian national must have lived in Canada for at least three years out of the four years preceding their application, and must have been settled in Canada for at least two years.

AUSTRALIA
Australia’s points-based system offers both a sponsored and an independent route to permanent status. The points required are earned through qualifications, work experience, age and English language skills. This route is not available to migrants who are over 45 years of age.
Graduates who have completed their study in Australia and wish to remain in the country to work are expected to apply for a general skilled migrant worker’s visa under the points-based system. For those who do not qualify at the outset, Australia offers a graduate (temporary) visa that allows students to remain in Australia for 18 months to gain experience and/or improve their English language skills with a view to meeting the 120-point pass-mark to qualify for a general skilled migrant worker’s visa.
Recently, Australia has streamlined its process so that student visa recipients are automatically granted permission to work up to 20 hours a week during term time without having to apply separately.
Foreign nationals who wish to naturalise and who became permanent residents on or after 1 July 2007 must have lived lawfully in Australia for at least four years before their application for naturalisation.

SINGAPORE
Singapore has liberalised its immigration policies, making it easier for skilled migrants to gain permanent residency.
Until recently, foreign workers needed to be sponsored by an employer before they could obtain the right to work in Singapore. Now, however, in its bid to become the world’s ‘talent capital’, Singapore has thrown open its doors to highly skilled migrants via the personalised employment pass (PEP) scheme. Unlike the normal employment pass, the PEP is not employer-specific and is granted on the strength of the migrant’s own merit. Under this scheme, migrants are allowed to remain and work in Singapore for five years. During these five years a PEP-holder must earn an annual fixed salary of at least S$30,000 (£12,500) and cannot remain unemployed for more than six months. To qualify under the scheme migrant workers must show that their last-drawn fixed monthly salary was of a minimum of S$7,000 (£2,900) and that they are former holders of normal employment passes.
Singapore does not operate a system designed to allow graduating students to work. Foreign graduates are required to obtain employment passes if they wish to remain in Singapore.

EUROPEAN CHALLENGERS

Ireland
In February 2007 Ireland’s Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment launched the implementation of new employment permit arrangements. The Working Visa/Work Authorisation Programme, which was the earlier Irish attempt at attracting highly skilled migrants, was replaced by a green card permit scheme.
The green card is instrumental in responding to the Irish labour market’s needs efficiently, in that it provides employment authorisation to highly skilled workers in occupations where there are skill shortages.
There are two categories of green card permit: one for positions in any industry or occupation with annual salaries of at least €60,000 (£47,400), and one for positions in designated shortage industries and occupations with annual salaries between €30,000 and €59,999 (£23,700-£47,400).
No labour market test is required, but an applicant must have a job offer of at least two years from a registered Irish employer, and must provide evidence that they meet the position’s requirements.
Either the employer or the foreign national can apply for the green card. The permit is issued for an initial period of two years, after which the foreign national may apply for renewal or permanent residency.
As a general rule, foreign nationals wishing to apply for Irish citizenship must have accrued a minimum of five years’ reckonable residence, with a minimum of 12 months’ continuous reckonable residence immediately before the application.
The new Irish green card scheme is likely to attract skilled migrants who do not meet the UK’s maintenance requirements, thereby placing Ireland ahead in the competition for talent in Europe.
To attract educated migrants, Ireland operates a scheme that permits foreign students with a primary, masters or doctorate degree from an Irish university to remain for a period of up to six months in order to seek employment and apply for a green card or a work permit.

Netherlands
The Netherlands also offers a route to highly skilled migrants, which makes it a serious contender, at least in Europe, if not the rest of the world./p>
The Dutch test for assessing a highly skilled migrant is based on previous earnings. To qualify under the scheme an applicant is required to earn an annual salary of at least €47,565 (£37,600) if they are over 30 years old. If the applicant is under 30, the required annual salary is €34,881 (£27,600). Migrants who have recently graduated in the Netherlands will qualify as long as they can show a prospective salary of at least €25,000 (£19,800).
Newly graduated migrants will also usually be given three months to find a role offering a salary that allows them access to the highly skilled migrant programme.
As a general rule, to qualify for Dutch citizenship foreign nationals must have lived in the Netherlands for at least five years continuously. They are required to demonstrate that they have integrated into Dutch society, which includes understanding of the Dutch language. To demonstrate their language skills, foreign nationals are required to undergo a naturalisation test.
On naturalisation, the Dutch authorities expect an applicant to renounce their previous citizenship, unless the foreign national is prohibited by the country of initial citizenship. Although the Netherlands’ system is intended to attract and retain skilled migrants, the Dutch language requirement is likely to be seen by many as an insurmountable obstacle to settling.

WHO IS WINNING THE RACE?
With their objective and transparent points-based systems, Australia and Canada appear to have solved the quest for the best and the brightest.
In Europe, Ireland and the Netherlands seem at present to be the only countries offering viable and flexible routes to highly skilled migrants.
In its effort to win the war for talent, the EU has proposed a blue-card programme as a Europe-wide solution. However, the concept has met strong opposition as arguably an EU-wide immigration system is unlikely to be able to regulate the heterogenous labour-market relations in the various member states.
At this stage, it would appear that the blue card is destined to fail and member states wishing to attract foreign talent would be well advised to devise their own traps for highly skilled migrants.

03/11/2013

Visitor bond scheme to be scrapped by government

Plans for a £3,000 "security bond" for some "high risk" overseas visitors to the UK are to be abandoned, the Home Office has confirmed.
The visa bond scheme was announced by Home Secretary Theresa May in June and was set to be introduced this month.
A Home Office spokesman confirmed a report that the policy would be scrapped.
The decision is thought to have been taken after Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg threatened to block it.
The aim of the scheme was to reduce the number of people from some "high risk" countries - including India, Pakistan, and Nigeria - staying in the UK once their short-term visas had expired.
Visitors would have paid a £3,000 cash bond before arrival in the UK - forfeited if they failed to make the return trip.
'Chaos'
Mr Clegg initially proposed the idea of a visitor bond in March, but under his version of the policy it would only apply to people from "high risk" countries who had been refused a visa through the normal route.
The scrapping of this bond will certainly prove embarrassing for Home Secretary Theresa May - and Labour will be keen to label it a U-turn.
The "visa bond" policy has been somewhat divisive in the coalition government, but was intended to be a flagship policy to show the government was getting tough on immigration.
It's an issue it is keen to puff its chest out on in the face of the growing popularity of UKIP.
But for now, the Home Office's immigration policy has hit a rough patch.
Less than two weeks ago, a roll-out of Home Office vans emblazoned with posters warning illegal immigrants to "go home or face arrest" was cancelled.
The home secretary herself was driven to describe them as a "blunt instrument".
Business Secretary Vince Cable later claimed the deputy prime minister's plan, which had suggested a bond of £1,000, had been deliberately misinterpreted by some of their Conservative cabinet colleagues.
Mr Cable also criticised the level at which the bond was set and said that it had caused "outrage" in India.
Among the departments understood to be opposed to the plans are the Foreign Office, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, and the Department for Communities and Local Government.
"The Home Office version of the policy was not acceptable to the Liberal Democrats and was not support by other government departments," Lib Dem sources said.
"They have seen the writing on the wall and binned it off.
"We have been clear from the start that the version was just not acceptable to us."
The bond idea was also floated several times by the previous Labour government but never implemented.
But that did not stop Labour's shadow immigration minister David Hanson launching an attack on the U-turn, accusing Mrs May of being "all over the place and presiding over an immigration policy in chaos".
'Go home' vans
He added: "Investors in India are now put off from investing in the UK whilst the Home Office fail repeatedly to do anything about their failure at our borders to stop and return illegal immigrants, failure to tackle backlogs in processing delays or enforcement of immigration rules within the UK."
Labour MP Keith Vaz, chairman of the Commons Home Affairs committee, said: "During this shambolic process the Home Office has managed to upset a number of foreign governments and confuse millions of potential visitors.
"This is not the way to fashion a strong and effective immigration policy."
The announcement comes two weeks after a roll-out of Home Office vans with posters warning illegal immigrants to "go home or face arrest" was cancelled.
Mrs May told MPs she accepted they had "not been a good idea" and were too much of a "blunt instrument".
Immigration minister Mark Harper defended the government's approach, saying: "It is clear our reforms are working because net migration is down by a third since its peak in 2010.
He added: "We are building an immigration system in the national interest by tightening areas where it was abused.
"The Immigration Bill will reduce the pull factors and ensure those people who do come to the UK are here to contribute, and not access public services they are not entitled to."

21/10/2013

Visa Law Services
01212364115
[email protected]
www.visalaw.co.uk

30 min Consultation and Initial Advice - Free

Level 1 -
• Attendance at Detention Centre, Home Office or Police Station to take instructions or represent
• Assistance with voluntary return
• Take over file from previous representatives & chase up
• Subject Access Request and Advice for long term undocumented migrants and overstayers
• Premium Service additional charge

Level 2 -
• Visitor Entry Clearance
• Tier 4 Student applications in the UK
• Transfer of Conditions/Travel Document/Certificate of Identity
• Adjourned additional hearings in the Tribunal
• Emergency Detention submission

Level 3 -
• British Citizenship - Naturalisation / Registration
• Tier 2 & 5 Worker applications in the UK
• Tier 4 Student Entry Clearance
• Ancestry Entry Clearance
• Application to Upper Tribunal - Application stage only
• CIO Bail Application (additional £500 to submit to Tribunal)

Level 4 -
• British Citizenship - Registration for child with 10 yrs in UK
• Tier 1 in the UK (excluding Investor or Entrepreneur)
• Tier 2 & 5 Worker Entry Clearance
• Points Based System Settlement Applications
• EEA / Ankara Agreement applications in UK
• Reconsideration / Administrative review

Level 5 -
• Settlement - 5 Years EEA, 6 yrs Discretionary Leave , spouse etc
• Discretionary Leave extension applications
• Applications under FM / EX1
• Child Entry Clearance
• Partner Entry Clearance

Level 6 -
• Human Rights / Article 8 Outside the Rules / Legacy
• Settlement - 10 and 20 years
• Dependent Relative / Article 8 Entry Clearance

Level 7 -
• Simple Appeals e.g. Tier 1, 2, 4 & EEA
• Asylum applications (including attendance at full asylum interview) (not inclusive of disbursements such as experts and interpreters)

Level 8 -
• Complex Appeals e.g. Asylum, Human Rights, Removal etc
• Tier 1 - Investor/Entrepreneur in UK.
• Tier 1 services for business owners

Address

161 Corporation Street
Birmingham
B46PH

Opening Hours

Monday 9am - 5:30pm
Tuesday 9am - 5:30pm
Wednesday 9am - 5:30pm
Thursday 9am - 5:30pm
Friday 9am - 5:30pm
Saturday 9:30am - 1:30pm

Telephone

+441212364115

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Visa Law Services posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Featured

Share