11/09/2025
innaugration as a fate accompli & available defenses
●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
- Egypt and Sudan the lower nile riparian states has vigorously condemned the great Ethiopian renaissance dam since it's inception relying on two fundamental principles of international water Law most importantly citing article 7 of the UN Watercourses convention and article 5 of the same instrument which prescribes principle of equitable and reasonable utilization) furthermore, egypt also invokes the bilateral colonial era agreement of 1959 with Sudan which posthumously allocated the entire flow of nile between the two states. However, Ethiopia 🇪🇹 has intermittently dismissed the Invocation of the two lower reparian states as absurd by blatantly condemning it as evasive of the fact on the ground. Having the hereinabove mentioned contending Caveats in mind, I would like to have a cursory look in to the legal defenses available for Ethiopia under international Water Law as follows;-
- Based On The UN Charter and Customary International Water Law, the UN Watercourses Convention, and the Principle of Sovereign Equality, the GERD is a legitimate and lawful exercise of its sovereign right to pursue sustainable development for its people. - Its inauguration and operation are conducted in accordance with, and respect for, the principles of international law governing transboundary watercourses. Ethiopia's defense rests on the following legal foundations:-
To begin with The Principle of Sovereign Equality and Permanent Sovereignty Over Natural Resources, which ultimately is the foundational defense, from which all others flow.
-The UN Charter establishes the principle of the sovereign equality of states. This is complemented by the UN General Assembly Resolution 1803 (1962) on "Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources," which affirms the right of peoples and nations to freely dispose of their natural wealth and resources. Having in mind the conceptual framework of this UN resolution, it would be possible to deduce that The Blue Nile is a vital natural resource originating within Ethiopia's sovereign territory. Ethiopia has an incontestable right to develop this resource for the economic development and well-being of its population, one of the largest in Africa that has historically lacked access to modern electricity. The GERD is a project of national development, not an instrument of aggression.
Principle of Equitable and Reasonable Utilization (Article 5, UN Watercourses Convention)
- Ethiopia can possibly turns Egypt's primary argument on its head, asserting that it is Egypt's historical usage that is inequitable based the Caveats that core principle of international water utilization entitles all watercourse states to an equitable and reasonable share of the benefits of an international watercourse. It requires balancing all relevant factors, including geographic, hydrological, and social-economic needs. Furthermore, Ethiopia can also argues that the current utilization of the Nile is profoundly inequitable stressing the fact that Despite contributing over 85% of the Nile's water, Ethiopia was historically excluded from using it by colonial-era agreements (the 1929 and 1959 treaties) to which it was never a party and which it consistently rejected.
- Ethiopia shall also have a legal safe harbors by contending that a truly equitable balance must consider the Contribution of water by alleging Ethiopia is the source of the majority of the water. On the other hand, interms of Social and Economic Needs, Over 60% of Ethiopia's population lacks access to electricity & The GERD will provide clean energy for domestic use and regional export, fostering economic development without consuming water (as hydropower is non-consumptive, meaning the water is released after generating electricity). While respecting existing uses, international law does not grant a veto to downstream states nor protect "acquired rights" to the exclusion of upstream development. Egypt must adapt its water management practices to accommodate the reasonable needs of other riparian states. As far as principles of Compliance with the Obligation Not to Cause Significant Harm under Article 7 of UN Watercourses Convention is concerned, Ethiopia can possibly argue that the obligation should not be interpreted as an obligation to prevent any harm but to take all appropriate measures to prevent the causing of significant harm;-
First by Modifying the dam's design and increasing the number of outlets to facilitate faster water release during droughts.
Second, by prolonging and extending Filling Period over several years to mitigate impact on downstream flow.
Third, by staunchly Participating in data exchange with downstream countries (though this has been intermittent), which clearly demonstrates a commitment to principle of transparency. By doing so, Ethiopia will place the burden of proof on Egypt to demonstrate that significant harm has actually occurred due to the dam's operation, not merely hypothetical or minor harm. Ethiopia can argue that during the filling periods, despite droughts, no catastrophic harm materialized in Egypt, proving the mitigation measures were effective.
As far as The Role of Cooperation between riparian states are concerned, Ethiopia may argue that preventing harm is a shared responsibility under international water Laws and jus cogentnorms . If Egypt experiences water shortages due to drought (a natural event), the responsibility to manage this is shared, and Ethiopia cannot be held solely accountable for natural variability in the river's flow.
- Fourth, regarding Fulfillment of Procedural Obligations of Good Faith and Cooperation, Ethiopia can maintain it has fulfilled the duty to cooperate, notify, and negotiate in good faith through Extended Negotiations Ethiopia has participated in over a decade of talks, negotiations, and consultations under the auspices of the AU, the World Bank, and the US Treasury. This demonstrates a commitment to the principle of cooperation.
- Fifth, Ethiopia points to its signing of the declaration of principle of 2015 as concrete proof of its good faith and its commitment to the principles of equitable use, no significant harm, and cooperation and can asserts that the failure to reach a final agreement is due to Egypt's inflexibility and its insistence on upholding its "historical rights" as a veto over any upstream project, a position incompatible with modern international water law.
Lust but not least, as far as the Environmental and Developmental Benefits of the GERD are concerned,
Ethiopia frames the GERD as a project that enhances, not harms, the lower riparian states based on the fact on the ground that The GERD provides a massive source of renewable energy, displacing fossil fuels and contributing to the global fight against climate change, it will stabilize water flows, reducing flooding in Sudan and providing regulated water for irrigation. The export of electricity to neighboring countries promotes regional economic integration. to add butter to honey, Ethiopia can also argues its own Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), while domestic, was rigorous and concluded the dam would have no significant negative downstream impact. It invites scientific cooperation to monitor effects rather than accept preemptive condemnation.
To conclude, Ethiopia can asserts that the GERD is a lawful and legitimate exercise of its sovereign rights. Its defense is built on the argument that:
1. The project is a cornerstone of its right to equitable and reasonable utilization of a shared resource.
2. It has taken all appropriate measures to prevent significant harm.
3. It has engaged in extensive, good-faith negotiations and procedural cooperation for over a decade.
4. The project provides significant regional and global benefits in clean energy and climate resilience.
Ethiopia can possibly reaffirm and maintains that it remains open to concluding a mutually beneficial agreement but will not accept a framework that perpetuates historical inequities or infringes upon its fundamental right to development. The inauguration of the GERD is not an act of defiance but the realization of a sovereign right exercised in accordance with international law. What must be underlined as a conclusion is innaugration of GERD is a fate accompli for Ethiopia and thereby attributes it with upper hand.
✋️ to Ethiopia
✋️ to all nile riparian states
Sena Roba Gemeda
11th of September 2025
Shashemene Oromia, 🇪🇹Ethiopia.
