28/05/2026
San Diego voters, here's my voter recommendations, aimed at fellow progressives:
(I'm sorry, I haven't formed a position on local races outside my own county.)
San Diego County Judicial Races:
Office 11: Leah Boucek is running unopposed, and is well-qualified according to the San Diego County Bar Association.
Office 18 and 34: I won't endorse the unopposed candidates, because they are prosecutors. We have enough of those in black robes already. Write in a name.
Office 31: Jodi Cleesattle is exceptionally well-qualified according to the SDCBA, and although she is a Deputy Attorney General, my research shows she hasn't worked in criminal prosecution, but in civil areas where the state is usually fighting on behalf of its citizens. She has a lot of legal experience and a commitment to the courts. She has my support, and I strongly urge a vote for her.
Office 32: I can't truly support any of the three candidates, but D'Ambrogi is the least objectionable.
US House of Representatives (52nd district): Juan Vargas is the incumbent Democrat, and he's not terrible But I'm writing in FRANCES YASMEEN MOTIWALLA, an activist and proponent of divesting from Israel. Plus, . She likely won't win on a write-in campaign, but she will build name recognition to take on Vargas in the future and push him to the left, maybe even get him to take a stronger stance. Democrats in Washington DC have FAILED to stand up to Trump, and deserve to be challenged.
State Board of Equalization, 4th District: Cody Peterson seems to be the best choice, and is endorsed by Courage California. Another leading Dem, Umberg, is just too corporate for my tastes.
State Assembly 79th District: The incumbent, LaShae Sharp-Collins is a RAD progressive! I recently met her at an Innocence Center event. She has my support all the way. Also,
County Board of Education, 3rd District: Alicia Munoz
County Treasurer-Tax Collector: Larry Cohen has solid Dem endorsements. Victor Roy is an independent. The other two are Republicans. The race is technically non-partisan, so party affiliations aren't on the ballot, you have to look them up. Now you know.
San Diego Measure A: Vote YES. This measure will charge a $8k-$10k tax to people who leave a home sitting empty for more than half a year, and even more for investor-owned homes. When housing affordability is in CRISIS, this is a strong financial incentive NOT to leave housing sitting empty while there are people unable to find a home. Don't listen to the scare tactics - the tax will NOT be due on your primary residence just because you travel, even if you travel for 6 mths or more. It is ONLY paid on a second home - extremely wealthy people who leave their beachfront "summer home" empty, for example. One gray area is whether taxes will be owed on whole-home AirBnB rental properties; but that may depend on whether they're left vacant more than half the year. The measure may not be perfect, but the more housing that's available, the more affordable it will be for everyone, and it's time the local gov't got involved in making sure that happens.
And yes, the super wealthy still won't rent out their summer home, but at least they'll pay a tax, which the city can use for ALL our needs, like libraries, potholes, and restoring free parking in Balboa Park. This can be a one small piece of the wealthy finally contributing more (remember most of them come up with tax shelters to actually pay a far smaller percentage of their income in taxes than the rest of us!)