Leslie J. Smith - Employment Lawyer, Mediator, Arbitrator

Leslie J. Smith - Employment Lawyer, Mediator, Arbitrator Canadian Employment Lawyer for employees and employers. Workplace Investigations. Mediation. Dispute resolution. Settlement oriented but never afraid of a battle.

Focused on what's best for the client. 905-257-7714 for inquiries.

Effective October 1, 2025, the Ontario Small Claims Court monetary jurisdiction increases to $50,000 from $35,000. Incre...
10/01/2025

Effective October 1, 2025, the Ontario Small Claims Court monetary jurisdiction increases to $50,000 from $35,000.

Increasing the small claims court monetary limit to $50,000 aims to improve access to justice for those with smaller claims. The small claims court process is more efficient and streamlined compared to the regular stream of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice as it does not involve a formal discovery process.

Raising the monetary limit is expected to help alleviate the ongoing backlog in the regular stream of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice through the redirection of more cases to the small claims court.

One disadvantage of Small Claims Court is the cost consequences. Costs are usually capped at 15% of the amount claimed unless a party's (or their representative's) conduct throughout the litigation warrants a higher amount.

If you have a claim for $50,000 or less in Ontario, you will be in Small Claims Court. This is a welcome improvement to our already sluggish Court system.

07/26/2025

Very humbled by this 5-star Google review posted yesterday.

"I was opposite Leslie on a file where I was the lawyer for the opposing party. I would hire her if I personally needed an employment lawyer. She was fierce and capable and quickly demonstrated that she understood the legal issues and would not make this easy for my client. I would like to think that I gave as good as I got. She has a great reputation for a reason."

Thank you!

MITIGATION, is a live issue in every case of termination of employment without cause, even BEFORE lawyers are involved. ...
07/19/2025

MITIGATION, is a live issue in every case of termination of employment without cause, even BEFORE lawyers are involved.

As soon as your employment is terminated, you need to start looking for work, tracking your job search efforts (date, place applied to, results) and keeping all documentary records of your applications including new job offers.

Mitigation earnings reduce common law pay in lieu of notice, so please do your lawyer a big favor, and immediately start looking for alternative employment after termination. EXCEPTION to this rule - if you are ill and cannot search for work. Advise your lawyer of any medical or other limitations you may have, that prevents you from seeking alternative employment.

DEFINITE-TERM EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS - the good, the bad and the ugly. Definite term employment agreements (employment fo...
07/07/2025

DEFINITE-TERM EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS - the good, the bad and the ugly.

Definite term employment agreements (employment for a defined period of time) with an early termination provision that is unenforceable, will result in the employer being liable to pay out the balance of the contract. YIKES!

EMPLOYERS should contact me:

a) To review their EXISTING definite-term employment agreements to ensure the early termination provision is enforceable.

b) Before terminating a definite-term employee.

c) BEFORE hiring someone for definite-term employment so that we can discuss whether definite or indefinite term employment is advisable and for me to draft the appropriate employment agreement that will limit severance pay and avoid contract pay-out.

McFarlane v. King Ursa Inc., 2025 ONSC 3553 - 4 year Executive VP Media & Analytics ($317,000 salary) on maternity leave...
06/22/2025

McFarlane v. King Ursa Inc., 2025 ONSC 3553 - 4 year Executive VP Media & Analytics ($317,000 salary) on maternity leave. Returns from mat leave. Company demoted her to Associate Partner and Vice President ($210,000 salary). Salary decrease and demotion held to be a constructive dismissal.

Awarded 12 months notice period (12 months of remuneration). 12 months after 4 years of service is high but the Court held that despite her best efforts, she was unable to secure a comparable position.

$40,000 Moral Damages awarded (not the usual case for garden variety constructive dismissal). Court's reasoning:

a) Isolation from company during extended mat leave called out for heightened sensitivity and professionalism or renegotiation of her compensation or severance.

b) Company's poor financial position leading to the reduction in salary notwithstanding, Court found there was no justification for imposing a demotion. "Any employee, especially one whose executive status is closely tied to her identity and self-esteem, would react negatively to a document containing a demotion."

c) The Court held that the demotion was callous and unduly insensitive, and struck at the employee's vulnerability as a person with a professional identity and status.

Employer should have just cut the salary without altering the title.

A wrongfully terminated employee has a positive obligation to mitigate their losses. "Mitigation" means to replace the l...
05/16/2025

A wrongfully terminated employee has a positive obligation to mitigate their losses. "Mitigation" means to replace the lost income by accepting a comparable job that is reasonable in the circumstances.

The applicable law on mitigation was summarized in Globex Foreign Exchange Corporation v Kelcher, 2011 ABCA 240 at para 55, as follows,

"A wrongfully terminated employee is entitled to damages, but a defendant employer can argue that damages ought to be reduced because of the employee’s unreasonable failure to mitigate the loss by taking other employment: Red Deer College v Michaels, [1976] 2 SCR 324, [1975] 5 WWR 575. The defendant’s burden of demonstrating a failure to mitigate is onerous, however, because although in breach, he is demanding positive action from the innocent party: Cheshire, Fifoot and Furmston at 683. Defendants cannot complain of a failure to mitigate caused or materially contributed to by their own actions: 2438667 Manitoba Ltd v Husky Oil Limited, 2007 MBCA 77, [2007] 9 WWR 642 at 654."

Typically, the obligation to mitigate arises after termination of employment. In a case from the Manitoba Court of Appeal in 2025 (Brown v General Electric Canada (2025 MBCA 37)), however, the Court dealt with a situation where an employee who worked for company A, was offered continued employment with a new company (company B) which was attempting to merge with company A. The offer of continued employment with company B was extended to the employee before the merger occurred.

The employee refused company B's offer of continued employment. Company A then terminated the employee's employment. The employee sought a severance package. Company A argued that the employee failed to mitigate and should receive no severance. The employee lost at trial and on appeal.

The Manitoba Court of Appeal effectively stated that the precise timing of the offer of continued employment to the employee, was not material to the question of mitigation.

BOTTOM LINE. If a company merging with or taking over your existing employer offers you continued employment, think twice before refusing the offer of continued employment. You don't want to be found to have failed to mitigate which will defeat your claim for severance.

An extremely complex area of Employment Law is constructive dismissal (CD). Each case is dependent upon the facts and no...
02/12/2025

An extremely complex area of Employment Law is constructive dismissal (CD). Each case is dependent upon the facts and not every fact pattern will amount to constructive dismissal, but to put it as simply as I can, employers who mistreat their employees, and/or introduce a significant change to a fundamental term of the employment agreement, MAY have constructively dismissed the affected employee.

A defense to a claim for constructive dismissal is Condonation (condone, or put up with). If your workplace is toxic, or your boss or co-worker is harassing you, or your employer levies a significant change to the terms of your employment, please call me right away. If you don't seek a lawyer's input when something happens at your workplace, you could be accused of condoning the change or mistreatment which will prevent you from successfully claiming CD in the future.

When meeting with a client who believes they have a case for CD, I review the facts, the evidence, and all employment agreements they signed before or during their employment. You could have a great case for CD, but there may be an enforceable termination provision that limits severance to statutory entitlements.

Like I said, it's a very complex area of the law. Promptly getting legal advice on your situation, is critical if you hope to advance a successful claim of CD. 905-257-7714.

Merry Christmas everyone! Wishing you and your family a peaceful, restful time with your loved ones!
12/25/2024

Merry Christmas everyone! Wishing you and your family a peaceful, restful time with your loved ones!

November 19, 2024. What do you do if you are pulled into an office only to face the HR "lady" and your boss with nothing...
11/20/2024

November 19, 2024.

What do you do if you are pulled into an office only to face the HR "lady" and your boss with nothing on the desk except a brown envelope?

Do your best to remain calm.

Don't ask questions.

Don't sign anything.

Just listen, take the envelope, and leave.

If you are allowed to clear out your desk, you will most likely be accompanied by someone in the office.

Don't swear and get upset at the office. You can do that in your car.

Then call me. 905-257-7714.

It's likely that there is at least one thing not quite right about your severance package. Or if you did not get a severance, definitely call me.

I'm here to help.

905-257-7714.

October 25, 2024. Can you be fired without notice or severance, for what you post on social media? Possibly.  Factors th...
10/25/2024

October 25, 2024.

Can you be fired without notice or severance, for what you post on social media?

Possibly.

Factors that employers must consider before summarily terminating an employee, include length of service, past disciplinary record and the employee's position; the employee's entire work history must be considered.

Some additional factors employers must consider before terminating employment for cause (without severance) for social media posts, are:

- Damage done to the business and/or reputation
- Whether the employee disparaged the employer
- Whether employee threatened another employee
- How frequent the social media posts were
- Whether the employee was uncooperative or defiant when faced with accusations of improper social media posting
- Whether the employee accepted responsibility for the offending posts
- Whether the post disclosed personal or confidential information belonging to the employer or to another employee
- Whether the posts were made during work hours

If your employment was terminated without notice or severance for something you posted on social media, keep the post and get in touch with me to review your situation. You may be entitled to severance.

Address

1540 Cornwall Road
Oakville, ON
L6J7W5

Opening Hours

Monday 9am - 5pm
Tuesday 9am - 5pm
Wednesday 9am - 5pm
Thursday 9am - 5pm
Friday 9am - 5pm

Telephone

+19052577714

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Leslie J. Smith - Employment Lawyer, Mediator, Arbitrator posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Leslie J. Smith - Employment Lawyer, Mediator, Arbitrator:

Featured

Share