01/18/2020
It was suggested by a colleague and good friend that I post about a nice “win” on a motion on Thursday which I attended as his agent. It was something that made me slightly embarrassed for the other side. I decided to make the post about professionalism and manners instead of about winning the motion, $500 costs to the cause after 1.5 hours of back-and-forth oral submissions. The issue should have simply been consented to, saving everyone (including the court’s) time and money. The response to the motion was more properly an issue for the Trial judge (which was what was ultimately ruled). What saddened me was the lack of manners and professionalism from opposing counsel. So I would like to remind everyone of a few basics:
(1) when you meet someone for the first time and they extend their hand and provide their name, it’s customary to respond by shaking their hand, introducing yourself and maybe, look up from your crossword or phone to acknowledge their existence. It’s the professional thing to do.
(2)win or lose, shake your colleagues hand. “Nice to meet you” is something I say. You can come up with your own. The case isn’t personal, it’s our job, our duty, to advocate for our client’s best interest, win or lose. When the judge rules, we go back to being colleagues not enemies.
(3)Your clients best interest comes first. Was it best to spend time preparing, researching, printing, copying, tabbing and binding your materials or if you step back, and ask yourself, do the issues or concerns I plan to raise in response affect my client’s best interest? Can this be brought up at a different time, without prejudice to my clients as to avoid an additional court attendance? From there, is it worth it for my client to spend $600-$1500 to oppose a motion, with no guarantee of winning or recovering costs? If so, proceed to oppose, if not, Consent.
These should be common sense and practice but sadly they are not.