Robertson Law

Robertson Law I've been practicing family law for 25 years. During that time I've gained experience and a strong reputation in the field.

I am commited to help you through to the life you want; with over 40 years of experience: working mainly in the areas of - divorce, parenting and support, division of property - child welfare - and independent court appointments child representation. When your family experiences a crisis that brings you to need a family lawyer, you are generally in a rough time of your life. My hope and goal is

to help you through this chapter of your life with a minimum of pain, and into life after the crisis. working together we can look for resolutions that you can live with and help you move on to that next stage of life. There are times when a resolution is not possible, such as physical or emotional danger within the family context. These circumstances require swift and clear action to provide the needed protection. I look forward to meeting with you to assist you.

Alberta has Law, specifically for protection against family & intimate partners violence. The process begins though an a...
10/18/2022

Alberta has Law, specifically for protection against family & intimate partners violence. The process begins though an application to a Provincial Court Judge or a Justice of the Peace for an Emergency Protection Order (EPO).

Sometimes the application can be
by telephone, and sometimes the investigating police will make the application and give the evidence. That application is made without notice, and then is often served by police on the person to be restrained/Respondent.

There are restrictions on the Respondent about contact directly or indirectly, including phone calls or emails/texts. Indirectly includes having friends or family initiating the contact. Restrictions usually prohibited the Respondent from going to the home, workplace or schools - all to increase safety.

Police may be Ordered to remove the Respondent from the house, and seizing weapons.

Provisions can be made so the Respondent can have contact with children, but that usually means getting an Order from a family court. The EPO will not deal with parenting issues (previously called custody/access).

The EPO is back in Court in 9 days for a review. The Respondent knows about the EPO, and responds in an affidavit to the evidence given at the initial EPO hearing.

At this stage, Legal Aid Alberta has a duty counsel program with a lawyer to assist the Claimant and a lawyer for the Respondent. Each should contact the program as soon as possible, so any necessary steps can be taken. Each lawyer will guide their client.

At this review date, there may be a resolution for a Mutual No Contact/Restraining Order; or agreement that the EPO stays in effect for up to a year. When there is no agreement, the Court sets the review over to a hearing. This hearing is not like most hearings with oral evidence. Here the transcript/written record of the evidence given at the initial application is the evidence for the Claimant, who is cross-examined by the Respondent or lawyer. The evidence in the Respondent's affidavit is the Respondent's evidence and will be cross examined by the Claimant/lawyer. Neither the Claimant nor the Respondent give their evidence from the beginning- it's earlier evidence.

The Judge can confirm the original EPO, or make some changes to it, or vacate the EPO all together. Sometimes the Judge will suggest and impose a mutual no contact/restraining Order.

The duty counsel program doesn't extend to the oral hearings beyond the early reviews. You can still apply to Legal Aid or retain a lawyer privately.

Whether it is an EPO or Restraining Order, they should be filed with police (CPIC Unit). That assists police if you call saying that there is a breach of the Order. Police will know there has been past family/intimate partner violence. Police will not know the nature and extent of the violence, from the Order.

EPO can be based on a very wide set of circumstances with varying degrees of danger. Similarly breaches of protection orders vary widely. Your report of the breach is vital to the police response.

No Protection Order will stop bullets or fists. It is still vital to have a safety plan to protect yourself.

I have a keen interest in family and intimate partner violence. I'm part of the Legal Aid duty counsel program to assist you, or through a private retainer.

The news story in Vancouver is an example of police not knowing the degree of violence that are responding to, when a breach is reported.

Vancouver police came under scrutiny last week after videos of a man being arrested were posted on social media, but police say their actions were justified by a court order protecting the man’s wife.

This is a post from the Alberta Sheriff's, and is enlightening as to the jurisdiction of the Sheriffs. https://www.faceb...
08/11/2022

This is a post from the Alberta Sheriff's, and is enlightening as to the jurisdiction of the Sheriffs.
https://www.facebook.com/100064728758882/posts/432515075582781/

On August 6, a member of Sheriff Highway Patrol was travelling north on Hwy 63 near Crow Lake, when he observed a Kia Forte travelling south at an extremely high speed. The sheriff used radar and determined the vehicle was travelling at 195 km/h in the posted 110 km/h zone.

During the traffic stop, the driver was tested for impairment. The 33-year-old male driver provided a breath sample, resulting in a “fail” reading. The driver held a graduated driver's licence, which requires a zero blood alcohol concentration or blood drug concentration level when driving. In addition to being unlawfully at large and wanted for parole violations, the driver was also breaching parole conditions to not be outside Edmonton and not to consume alcohol. The individual was placed under arrest for the parole violations.

He was issued an immediate roadside sanction for alcohol, and summonses to attend court for charges of speeding, careless driving, and possessing cannabis within easy reach of the driver. The driver was subsequently transported to Edmonton Remand Centre, and the vehicle was impounded.

Changes to federal law made in 2018 give law enforcement officers the authority to demand a breath sample from every motorist who has been lawfully pulled over. This means that every driver stopped by a police officer or sheriff is compelled by the Criminal Code to provide a breath sample when an officer asks them to — regardless of the reason for the traffic stop, the time of day or the type of vehicle.

Impaired driving is the leading criminal cause of death in Canada, making it a top priority for the Sheriff Highway Patrol and its law enforcement partners year-round.

Courts in Alberta continue with Covid19 restrictions beyond March 1. Face Masks, social distancing and remote court appe...
03/04/2022

Courts in Alberta continue with Covid19 restrictions beyond March 1. Face Masks, social distancing and remote court appearances continue after March 1/22.

The Alberta Court of Appeal, Court of Queen's Bench and provincial courts say in a news release that all COVID-19 restrictions will remain in place.

W5 episode "Dubious Diagnosis". Medical conditions incorrectly diagnosed as child abuse. Families face child protection ...
02/13/2022

W5 episode "Dubious Diagnosis". Medical conditions incorrectly diagnosed as child abuse. Families face child protection applications/apprehension and/or criminal charges.
This is an area of law that Jim Robertson practices.

It is such a balance between protecting children and ensuring that child protection authorities and medical professionals get it right.

Families across the country tell W5 they were falsely accused of child abuse after bringing their sick or injured child to the hospital. Some parents are cal...

Another interesting court decision out of Provincial Court BC, in Kelowna about Covid vaccine, when separated parents ca...
02/10/2022

Another interesting court decision out of Provincial Court BC, in Kelowna about Covid vaccine, when separated parents cannot agree.

A B.C. provincial court judge has ordered a father not to talk with his 11-year-old son about COVID-19 vaccination or to share any social media or other information about the vaccine and the disease with his child.

Alberta Courts postpone non urgent in person trials as Covid cases rise.
01/03/2022

Alberta Courts postpone non urgent in person trials as Covid cases rise.

Concern over the fast-spreading Omicron variant is cited as the reason for adjournments and tightened health measures.

01/03/2022

The Alberta Court of Queen's Bench and Provincial Court have adjourned non urgent in person trials that were scheduled between Jan 4 and 21, 2022. Further details at Albertacourts.ab.ca

A new announcement from the Court of Queen's Bench and the Provincial Court, to adjourn in-person hearings that are sche...
01/03/2022

A new announcement from the Court of Queen's Bench and the Provincial Court, to adjourn in-person hearings that are scheduled between Jan 4 and 21, 2022.

The Provincial Court of Alberta is postponing certain proceedings in response to increasing COVID-19 cases.

12/17/2021

Interesting court decision in Alberta, directing Covid19 vaccine to children, where the parents, who share decision-making were not able to agree

https://canlii.ca/t/jl979

Emailing TRB-v-KWPB-2021-ABQB-997---Memorandum-of-Decision (2).pdf

Address

700, 1816 Crowchild Trail NW
Calgary, AB
T2M3Y7

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Robertson Law posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Robertson Law:

Share