10/06/2020
Case Law Update: How safe is your beneficiary designation?
2020 ONSC 1506 re: Calmusky Estate
An interesting judgement has arisen from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice earlier this year with respect to beneficiary designations on registered assets.
The decision arises out of a dispute regarding a beneficiary designation on a Registered Retirement Income Fund. The Respondent, who was the beneficiary named on a RRIF held in his late father's name, argued that he was entitled to the proceeds of the account as named beneficiary (as has traditionally been the view except where there is some evidence to the contrary).
The Applicant, the brother of the Respondent and a disappointed beneficiary, argued that where an adult child is named as a beneficiary on a registered asset, that adult child holds the proceeds on trust for the Estate of the parent. The Applicant was effectively arguing that a presumption arises in law similar to that which arises where assets are held on joint account with an adult child.
There is no appellate case law that would support this finding, however the hearing judge viewed the law as clarified by the Supreme Court in Pecore was applicable (in Pecore, the Court clarified that assets held on joint account with an adult parent are presumptively held in trust for the Estate of that adult parent and are not the subject of a gift to the adult child. While now settled law, this reasoning has never before been applied to registered accounts).
Many in the Ontario bar will be watching closely how this matter develops and whether future judgements support the court's finding in this instance. In addition to the registered account issue, there was also a dispute as to occupation rent which was, itself, unusual in its disposition. However, the rent matter is not the main takeaway from this case.
The long and short of it is that there may yet be another reason why clients should be extremely judicious in making beneficiary designations on registered assets. Even before re: Calmusky Estate, this was an area fraught with potential pitfalls. Beneficiary designations can undermine the Estate plan, cause adverse tax consequences, and generally reduce accountability in the administration of the Estate and disposition of the assets.
As always, relying on the advice of non-lawyers or the results of your own online research in order to save a few dollars on legal fees is false economy. Beneficiary designations, particularly those not made in favour of a spouse, should not be made without first consulting with a solicitor knowledgeable in this area and in view of the totality of the Estate plan and your own unique financial, legal, and family circumstances.