19/05/2026
We’re pleased to share a significant positive outcome before the Administrative Review Tribunal (ART) ⚖️
Our client initially faced refusal of a Subclass 600 Visitor Visa, followed by a consequential offshore Subclass 309 Partner Visa refusal under Section 501(1) of the Migration Act on character grounds, with discretion exercised to refuse. The criminal offences in question spanned a period of over 15 years.
Despite the refusal, we formed the view that the Applicant had a strong demonstrated capacity for rehabilitation and a low risk of recidivism, both of which were supported and affirmed in an independent report from the treating clinical psychologist.
We were engaged to undertake the review and prepared a detailed submission supported by strong evidence, including a clinical psychological report, statutory declarations from family members, witness statements from his wife in Australia, and material addressing the impact on the family, including his wife’s business and grandchildren.
A lot was at stake for the Applicant, his Wife and their extended family in Australia.
With Detailed Submission and advocacy before the Tribunal, following consideration of the evidence, the Tribunal determined:
“The reviewable decision is set aside, and the matter is remitted to the Respondent with a direction not to exercise the discretion provided in s 501(1) to refuse to grant the visa.”
A strong reminder of the importance of comprehensive, evidence-based advocacy in complex character matters. Amazing outcome for all!
Great Legal Team effort Anne O’Donoghue Lihini Konara Diane Markantonakis
ImmigrationLawAustralia VisaAppeal LegalAdvocacy Rehabilitation ClientOutcome
