25/06/2017
I was attracted to this matter because of the frequency that diet often gets raised in parenting disputes and on rarer occasions in child protection cases. Clients are often surprised that courts generally treat these type of complaints with a bit of a yawn.
The approach being suggested by NSW is problematic for a number of reasons but the one most people should be concerned about is the figures being quoted around childhood obesity.
Its these figures that are framing the crisis for its advocates. I don't have the Victorian figures (they are probably similar) but in NSW the official line is that 25% of children are obese and the CDC asserts 20% in the United States.
The basis for these figures is the Body Mass Index (BMI) tool which, surprise surprise doesn't actually directly measure body fat. So in other words a kid could actually be holding a fair bit of muscle or bone weight and end up labelled obese because they fit the diagnostic definition using the BMI.
Interested to hear the thoughts of others on this or alternatively if you want some legal advice on if overfeeding your child is likely to see you end up in the family court...please ask!