Comments
As anticipated, the issue is now being joined in the Indiana State Legislature, whether sexual orientation and gender identity laws should be written to trump the religious liberty rights of all Indiana citizens. Based upon twenty years of legal history and for the reasons set forth below, I think Indiana's current religious freedom restoration act provides the appropriate equalizing balance between religious liberty and sexual orientation non-discrimination principles.
At a time when many Americans may be wondering why government's support of religious liberty for all Americans is so important, it is helpful to reflect upon President Lincoln's Proclamation of March 30, 1863 requesting that April 30, 1863 be a national day of fasting and prayer. Many Americans faithfully responded to President Lincoln's request. With his issuance of the Emancipation Proclamation, effective January 1, 1863, his call for prayer and fasting in March 1863 and the Union's extremely costly victory at Gettysburg in July, the civil war began its journey towards it ultimate resolution in 1865.
On March 4. 1865, in his famous Second Inaugural Address just before his assassination on April 14, 1865, President Lincoln returned to the theme of Divine Providence in the affairs of this nation:
"The Almighty has His own purposes. "Woe unto the world because of offenses; for it must needs be that offenses come, but woe to that man by whom the offense cometh. If we shall suppose that American slavery is one of those offenses which, in the providence of God, must needs come, but which, having continued through His appointed time, He now wills to remove, and that He gives to both North and South this terrible war as the woe due to those by whom the offense came, shall we discern therein any departure from those divine attributes which the believers in a living God always ascribe to Him? Fondly do we hope, fervently do we pray, that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away. Yet, if God wills that it continue until all the wealth piled by the bondsman's two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said "the judgements of the Lord are true and righteous altogether.With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation's wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations."
Louantha Kerr, thanks for telling me about this great site.
Thank you for your work in Oklahoma!!!!
JC-LOLP's General Counsel, Sam Casey, said yesterday afternoon at the time the brief was filed:
The abortion industry's longstanding opposition and ignorance of any reasonable safety regulation of two powerful drugs never intended by their manufacturers to be used for abortion, because of the industry's selfish desire to make more money while providing less than safe medical supervision for abortion is unconscionable. Hopefully, the Supreme Court of Oklahoma will accept our Oklahoma Doctors' 'friend of the court' advice that Oklahoma law properly reflects the sound medical evidence which demonstrates that the FDA-approved Mifeprex Regimen, including the use of misoprostol as prescribed in the FDA-approved Mifeprex Regimen, is safer than off-label uses of mifepristone and/or misoprostol to induce a medical abortion. Since surgical abortion is always available as an option throughout the first trimester, and since it is safer and faster than medical abortion, the State's restriction of medical abortions from 63 to 49 days poses no undue burden on access to abortion. Further, since treatment of ectopic pregnancy and medical abortion are considered separate procedures by the medical community, the Act's restrictions on medical abortions in no way restrict the use of methotrexate to treat ectopic pregnancies. Consequently, this Oklahoma law best protects women's health while constitutionally posing no undue burden on women's access abortion, as required by the United States Supreme Court.
Wouldn't we be shocked if any man told us, "Personally I am opposed to r**e, but I respect the man's right to choose...? As a father or a grandfather,no man would compromise to allow the r**e of his daughter or grand-daughter long as it was 'safe and rare' or only legal under 'specified circumstances.' R**e is a violent act that is criminal without compromise (even when the girl is a willing sexual participant but underage). Yet, another violent act that actually causes death—abortion—is politicized as a reproductive right or an acceptable exception. Read the thought-provoking article below to further sharpen your thinking...
A CHRISTMAS STORY. In the face of the kind of adversity of soul that comes with your daughter being given an 'INCOMPATIBLE WITH LIFE' diagnosis in utero and the medical community's strong pressure to end the life of your daughter through a late-term abortion, here is a rare example of a single post-abortive African mother's UNCONDITIONAL LOVE for her baby child. As you listen to Stephanie Spidell's story below, reflect on how it was a mother's unconditional love for her child, and the support of her husband who was not the father of that child, that in the midst of their crisis pregnancy made the first Christmas possible.
Who will disarm the abortionists? As we celebrate the 5% decline in USA abortions, let's not forget or cease our efforts to save the lives of the 1.15 million unborn children (3150 children per day) whose lives are terminated by induced abortion every year in America's abortion clinics. Here are the latest statistics released for 2009 on November 23, 2012 by the Centers for Disease Control.
WHO IS WRONG. The second edition of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Safe Abortion: Technical and Policy Guidance for Health Systems deserves scrutiny because it raises questions about whether it promotes the highest standards of medical care. The guidance aims at ensuring that abortion may be performed more widely by non-medical personnel even if it has to proceed without diagnosis, ultrasound, follow-up care, or drugs that have become standard in medical practice. A primary concern is the WHO seems to be recommending abortion practices for women in developing countries that have been rejected by medical experts in the developed world. WHO bases its promotion of the revised guidelines on claims that abortion is both safer than childbirth and also a human right, neither of which enjoys international agreement.
It is often said by social scientists that "demography is destiny." If so the study (set forth in English) below, Demography in Life: How Goes Europe?, is a wake-up call to stop listening to the eugenicists who tells us we have too many people and not of the right sorts; and begin listening to the demographers who are telling us that "under-population" will be our biggest social problem everywhere, except maybe Africa, that can only be mitigated by a renewal of marriage, family and the the birth of at least 2 children per fertile woman. Something to ponder at Christmas when we celebrate, not denigrate, the birth of a child.
Here's a great example of a church-based "no longer bound" abortion recovery program. Too many women and men need to heal from abortion-related trauma but fee there is nowhere to go. Thankfully, more and more churches are seeing the light and providing the means for post-abortive people to recover and be healed.
The fascinating article in Scientific American below provides further support for the idea that pregnancy may be even better fro mothers than we already knew it was. Read on by clicking the link below.