17/05/2026
Most people assume higher floor + pool facing naturally means better returns. The data below might change how you look at less premium facing units.
In both comparisons:
• Tennis court facing units actually outperformed
• Even against higher floor garden/pool facing units
——————
Example A (illustrated in the video):
🎾 Mid Floor - Tennis Court Facing
~79.6% return on equity
~14.1% annualised ROE
➡️✨Buyer used $311,530 to generate $$248,000 in profit
[vs]
🌊 High Floor - Infinity Pool Facing
~46.2% return on equity
~7.4% annualised ROE
➡️ Buyer used $335,600 to generate $155,000 in profit
——————
Example B:
🎾 Low Floor, Stack 49 Tennis Court Facing
~77% return on equity
~12.3% annualised ROE
➡️ ✨Buyer used $300,220 to generate $232,000 in profit
[vs]
🪴High Floor Stack 42 Garden Facing
~60% return on equity
~8.6% annualised ROE
➡️ Buyer used $320,230 to generate $191,000 in profit
——————
The takeaway isn’t really about Forett. At any new launch, the “less premium” facing stacks deserve a closer look. Entry price does most of the heavy lifting on your eventual return.
💬 Vikki
878 11008
——————
【高楼层 + 泳池景,真的一定赚更多吗?】
很多人会默认:
高楼层 + 泳池景 = 回报一定更好。
但下面这组数据,可能会改变你对“非 premium 朝向”的看法。
在这两组对比里:
• 网球场朝向单位,回报反而更高
• 甚至跑赢更高楼层的园景 / 泳池景单位
——————
【案例 A|影片里分享的例子】
🎾 中楼层|网球场朝向
~79.6% 资金回报率
~14.1% 年化回报率
➡️ 用 $311,530 的本金,做出约 $248,000 盈利 ✨
[vs]
🌊 高楼层|无边泳池景观
~46.2% 资金回报率
~7.4% 年化回报率
➡️ 用 $335,600 的本金,只做出约 $155,000 盈利
——————
【案例 B】
🎾 低楼层|49 Stack 网球场朝向
~77% 资金回报率
~12.3% 年化回报率
➡️ 用 $300,220 的本金,做出约 $232,000 盈利 ✨
[vs]
🪴 高楼层|42 Stack 园景朝向
~60% 资金回报率
~8.6% 年化回报率
➡️ 用 $320,230 的本金,做出约 $191,000 盈利
——————