Nouman Muhib Kakakhel - Lawyer & Legal Consultant

11/09/2026

پاکستانی شہریت ختم کرنے کا طریقہ، CNIC اور پاسپورٹ کی منسوخی — مکمل قانونی رہنمائی

How can Pakistani citizenship be renounced? What is the procedure for renunciation of Pakistani citizenship, and what happens to a Pakistani CNIC and passport after renunciation?

This video explains the legal procedure for ending Pakistani citizenship, cancellation of CNIC and Pakistani passport, dual nationality, and other ancillary legal issues that may arise in the process.

The video is presented by Nouman Muhib Kakakhel, Citizenship Lawyer in Pakistan and Citizenship Lawyer in Peshawar, who discusses Pakistani citizenship law and related nationality matters in simple and practical terms.

The video is particularly relevant for Pakistanis who have acquired foreign citizenship and are considering renouncing Pakistani citizenship, cancelling their CNIC or Pakistani passport, or seeking guidance regarding their citizenship and nationality status.

Pakistani citizenship renunciation, Pakistani citizenship cancellation, Pakistani citizenship ختم کرنے کا طریقہ, renunciation of Pakistani citizenship, CNIC cancellation, Pakistani passport cancellation, dual nationality Pakistan, Pakistani citizenship law, Citizenship Lawyer in Pakistan, Citizenship Lawyer in Peshawar.

06/09/2026

خیبر پختونخوا کے سرکاری ملازمین کے لیے پنشن کی کم از کم کوالیفائنگ سروس کتنے سال ہے؟

What is the minimum qualifying service required for pension for KP civil servants?

For civil servants governed by the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Civil Servants Pension Rules, 10 years of qualifying service is an important requirement for pension eligibility.

Questions may also arise regarding the counting of contractual service, contract period, qualifying service and calculation of pension. Where a dispute arises regarding service or pension, the appropriate departmental remedy and, where applicable, the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Service Tribunal may be relevant.

This video discusses the basic legal position regarding KP pension rules, qualifying service, contractual service, pension calculation, departmental appeal and Service Tribunal.

Nouman Muhib Kakakhel, Advocate
Service Lawyers in Peshawar | Service Lawyers in Islamabad

Contact: 0316-5533555

PensionQualifyingService ContractualService ContractService PensionCalculation ServiceTribunal KPServiceTribunal DepartmentalAppeal ServiceLaw ServiceLawyersInPeshawar ServiceLawyersInIslamabad PeshawarHighCourt LawyersInPeshawar NoumanMuhibKakakhel

30/08/2026

Present Legal Status of Deceased Son Quota in Pakistan — Supreme Court Judgment & Your Legal Rights Explained ⚖️

The “Deceased Quota” (also known as Son Quota / hereditary appointment quota) for government jobs in Pakistan was declared unconstitutional and discriminatory by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in its landmark judgment (PLD 2024 SC 1276, Civil Petition No. 3390 of 2021, dated 18 October 2024). Family members — widow, widower, spouse, or child of a deceased or medically retired civil servant — can no longer be appointed to government posts without open advertisement, competition, and merit.

However, a crucial clarification followed: this judgment does NOT apply retrospectively. It does not affect appointments already made, and it does not take away accrued rights or set aside past and closed transactions. This means that if your father or husband passed away or retired on medical grounds BEFORE the September/October 2024 Supreme Court judgment, your right to be appointed under the Deceased Quota may still be legally protected and enforceable.

Many families are unaware that their case may still qualify, or are being wrongly told by departments that the quota is “closed for everyone.” Understanding the exact cut-off, the correct legal procedure, and how to enforce your accrued right is critical — and time-sensitive.

Nouman Muhib Kakakhel is amongst the leading service lawyers in Peshawar, regularly appearing before the Peshawar High Court and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Services Tribunal, along with the Islamabad High Court and Federal Services Tribunal, being a Service Lawyer in Islamabad.

Viral Trending PakistanNews Law

25/08/2026

The Peshawar High Court has granted interim relief to three doctors, allowing them to participate in the ongoing recruitment process for the posts of Members of Services (BPS-18) in the Health Department, Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.

Nouman Muhib Kakakhel, Advocate represented the petitioners.

25.08.2026

Nouman Muhib Kakakhel,
Advocate High Court |
Lawyer in Peshawar & Islamabad |
📞 +92316-5533555 (WhatsApp & Call)

19/08/2026

افغان شہریوں کو آج کل پشاور ہائی کورٹ سے کن معاملات میں ریلیف مل رہا ہے؟

In what circumstances is the Peshawar High Court currently granting relief to Afghan nationals?

With the ongoing Afghan deportation and repatriation process in Pakistan, many Afghan nationals are seeking legal protection through the Peshawar High Court.

In this video, I explain the types of cases and circumstances in which Afghan nationals are currently receiving relief from the Peshawar High Court, including matters relating to deportation, arrest, detention, UNHCR cases, POC, Pakistani citizenship, family circumstances, humanitarian grounds and other pending legal proceedings.

If you are searching for information about Afghan deportation from Pakistan, Peshawar High Court relief for Afghans, how to stop deportation, protection from arrest or detention, UNHCR cases, POC cases, Afghan citizenship cases, or legal remedies available to Afghan nationals in Pakistan, this video explains the current legal position in simple terms.

The outcome of every case depends on its individual facts, circumstances and legal grounds.

⚖️ Nouman Muhib Kakakhel, Advocate High Court
Citizenship & Immigration Lawyer in Peshawar | Afghan & POC Cases

AfghanCitizens UNHCRPakistan POC AfghanCitizenship AfghanImmigration ImmigrationLawyer CitizenshipLawyer LawyersInPeshawar PeshawarLawyer NoumanMuhibKakakhel

18/08/2026

سرکاری ملازم کا تبادلہ کن بنیادوں پر چیلنج کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

Can a civil servant challenge a transfer order? What are the legal grounds on which a transfer can be challenged before the competent forum?

In this detailed video, I discuss the important legal grounds for challenging the transfer of a civil servant in Pakistan, including circumstances where a transfer order may be questioned under service law.

A transfer is generally an administrative matter, but in certain circumstances, the courts or relevant service forum may examine its legality. Understanding the difference between a routine administrative transfer and a legally challengeable transfer order is therefore important for government employees.

The video covers transfer orders, service matters, civil servants’ rights, administrative decisions, Service Tribunal jurisdiction, and available legal remedies.

If you are a government employee, civil servant, public servant, teacher, or officer facing a transfer you believe is unlawful or legally challengeable, this video is for you.

Nouman Muhib Kakakhel, Advocate is one of the leading Service Lawyers in Peshawar, dealing with service matters and representing clients before the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Service Tribunal and Peshawar High Court, subject to the facts and jurisdiction of each case.

Service Lawyer in Peshawar | Service Tribunal Lawyer Peshawar | Service Matter Lawyer | Civil Servant Lawyer | Government Employee Lawyer | Transfer Case Lawyer | Transfer Order Challenge | Challenge Transfer Order | Illegal Transfer | Service Tribunal Peshawar | KP Service Tribunal Lawyer | Peshawar High Court Lawyer | Service Law Pakistan | Government Employee Transfer | Civil Servant Transfer | Service Litigation Pakistan

⚖️ Nouman Muhib Kakakhel, Advocate
Leading Service Lawyer in Peshawar | Service Tribunal Lawyer | Service Matters & Litigation

14/08/2026

NADRA Verification Board نے National Status مسترد کر دیا؟ اب کیا کریں؟

If NADRA’s Verification Board has refused to recognize your National Status or Pakistani Citizenship, even after a proper verification process where your documents and statements were presented, there may be legal remedies available.

In this video, I explain what can be done when a NADRA Verification Board decision does not properly consider the evidence, documents, statements, or other material submitted during the proceedings.

Understanding the NADRA verification process, Pakistani citizenship law, nationality status, documentary evidence, and available legal remedies is crucial before taking the next step.

⚖️ Nouman Muhib Kakakhel, Advocate
Citizenship Lawyer in Peshawar | NADRA & Pakistani Citizenship Matters

For legal guidance regarding NADRA Verification Board cases, Pakistani citizenship, national status, nationality disputes, citizenship applications, and related constitutional/legal remedies, consult a qualified lawyer after reviewing your complete record.

CitizenshipLawyerPeshawar NADRALawyer PeshawarLawyer PakistanCitizenship NationalityLaw CitizenshipCase NADRAIssues NoumanMuhibKakakhel

13/08/2026

خیبر پختونخوا سروس ٹریبونل نے ملاکنڈ لیویز فورس کے صوبیدار میجر کے عہدے پر دی گئی ترقی کو کالعدم قرار دیدیا ۔

یہ حکم بھی دیا گیا کہ تمام اہل امیدواروں کے ترقی کے معاملات کا متعلقہ سروس رولز کے مطابق ازسرِنو جائزہ لیا جائے۔

نعمان محب کاکاخیل نے صوبیدار سیف ارحمٰن کے طرف سے کیسے کے پیروی کی۔

اُن سے عدالت کو بتایا کہ صوبیدار معذور کے لیے صوبیدار سیف الرحمن واحد صوبیدار تھے جنکے پاس گریجویٹ ڈگری تھی پھر بھی ایک انپڑھ کو صوبیدار تعینات کیا گیا۔

عدالت نے وکیل کے بحث سننے کے بعد صوبیدار میجر پر پروموشن کا نوٹیفکیشن غیر قانونی قرار دیا اور صوبیدار سیف الرحمان کو بطور اے صوبیدار میجر تعینات کیا حکم کیا قانون کے مطابق۔

KP Service Tribunal Sets Aside Subedar Major Promotion, Orders Consideration of Saif ur Rehman for Appointment

PESHAWAR: The Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Service Tribunal has set aside the promotion of a Subedar to the post of Subedar Major in the Malakand Levies Force and directed the competent authorities to reconsider the cases of all eligible candidates in accordance with the applicable service rules.

Nouman Muhib Kakakhel, Advocate, represented Subedar Saif ur Rehman before the Tribunal.

During the proceedings, counsel argued that Subedar Saif ur Rehman was the only Subedar among the candidates who possessed a graduate degree, yet a comparatively less-qualified candidate was promoted to the post of Subedar Major.

Counsel further contended that the educational qualification prescribed under the applicable promotion rules had been ignored and that the impugned promotion was therefore contrary to the governing service rules.

After hearing the arguments, the Tribunal set aside the notification promoting the Subedar to the post of Subedar Major, holding that the matter required fresh consideration in accordance with law.

The Tribunal directed the competent authority to place the cases of Subedar Saif ur Rehman, the previously promoted official and other eligible candidates before the Departmental Promotion Committee for fresh consideration strictly in accordance with the applicable rules.

The Tribunal further directed that the exercise be completed within the prescribed period. Subedar Saif ur Rehman has consequently been recommended for appointment against the post of Subedar Major, subject to the outcome of the fresh consideration in accordance with law.

Nouman Muhib Kakakhel, Advocate, appeared on behalf of Subedar Saif ur Rehman before the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Service Tribunal.

12/08/2026

Rs7 Crore Cheque Dishonour Case: Peshawar Court Grants Bail to Accused

PESHAWAR | JURISTS NEWS: An Additional Sessions Judge, Peshawar, on Monday granted bail to Sohail Arshad, who is accused of issuing a cheque worth Rs70 million (Rs7 crore) to Ajmal Khan which was allegedly dishonoured upon presentation.

The accused was represented by Nouman Muhib Kakakhel, Advocate, before the court.

During the hearing, the defence counsel argued that the complainant had no substantive evidence to establish the alleged transaction apart from the cheque itself. The counsel contended that the complainant had also failed to establish the source of the alleged Rs70 million, the mode through which the amount was transferred, and whether the requisite taxes had been paid.

The defence further argued that the essential ingredients of Section 489-F of the Pakistan Penal Code were not satisfied and that the prosecution had failed to establish a prima facie case against the accused.

According to the defence, the dispute arose from an earlier financial and property-related transaction. The counsel submitted that the complainant had acted as a Jirga mashar in an attempt to resolve a dispute involving approximately Rs20 million allegedly owed to the accused.

The defence case was that, during the settlement process, a property was offered to the accused in lieu of the amount allegedly recoverable by him. The accused was subsequently asked to pay an additional Rs15 million to another disputing party on the premise that the property was valued at Rs35 million.

The counsel alleged that the property ultimately turned out to be non-existent or incapable of being validly transferred to the accused and that the accused had himself been subjected to a financial loss in the transaction.

The defence maintained that the matter essentially involved a civil dispute requiring determination by a competent court and argued that the case did not fall within the prohibitory clause applicable to bail.

After hearing the arguments, the court allowed the bail petition and directed the accused to furnish two sureties of Rs1 million each.

The allegations against the accused have not been finally adjudicated and remain subject to determination by the competent court.

Reported by: Jurists News

11/08/2026

MTI Amendment Act 2026 — Important Change for MTI Employees ⚖️

Are you an MTI employee facing an employment issue, service matter, disciplinary action, or workplace grievance?

The MTI Amendment Act 2026 has introduced an important change in the grievance redressal procedure for MTI employees. Under the amended law, an employee is required to approach the Grievance Redressal Committee first regarding their employment-related grievance. If the matter remains unresolved, the employee may then approach the MTI Tribunal, subject to the applicable legal procedure.

This means that understanding the MTI employee grievance procedure, MTI Tribunal jurisdiction, and the role of the Grievance Redressal Committee is now particularly important before pursuing a service or employment dispute.

If you are an MTI employee in Pakistan and have a grievance relating to your employment, service, disciplinary proceedings, or other employment matters, knowing the correct legal forum and procedure can make a significant difference.

MTI Amendment Act 2026, MTI employees, MTI Tribunal, Grievance Redressal Committee, MTI employee grievances, MTI service matters, employment disputes, service law Pakistan, employee rights Pakistan, MTI Act, medical teaching institutions, MTI law Pakistan, employment law Pakistan, service tribunal.

Nouman Muhib Kakakhel advocate is a service lawyer in Peshawar who deals with service matters before the MTI Tribunal, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Services Tribunal, Federal Services Tribunal and the Peshawar High Court.