Legal Aim

Legal Aim Law Made Easy. Legal awareness in Urdu & English. Legal awareness only.

Learn rights, PPC, civil, criminal, family, tax, labour & business laws, court procedure, FIR, bail, Khula, contracts & landmark judgments for Pakistan.

2026 SCMR 1085Related Witness – Evidentiary Value:A related witness who had personally witnessed the crime is not merely...
19/08/2026

2026 SCMR 1085
Related Witness – Evidentiary Value:

A related witness who had personally witnessed the crime is not merely a family member in the same occurrence. Such testimony could not be discarded on the grounds of relationship.
Ref:_2023 SCMR 723, 795_

2026 SCMR 109Present: Shahid Bilal Hassan, J. & Shakeel Ahmad, J.  Pir Shah Abdul Haq (deceased) throughL.Rs. & others -...
19/08/2026

2026 SCMR 109
Present: Shahid Bilal Hassan, J. & Shakeel Ahmad, J.
Pir Shah Abdul Haq (deceased) throughL.Rs. & others
--Appellants
Vs

M. Irfan & others — Respondents
C.A. No. 2148 & 2266 of 2019
Decided: 24.02.2026

(a) Ss. 39, 42 & 54, Limitation Act, 1908. S. 115 — Oral Mutation — Challenge to suit filed after 22 years. Fraud & Scope of Revisional Interference.

Pivot Issue:
Whether a challenge to mutation made after an unexplained delay of over 22 years could justify interference by the High Court with concurrent findings in revisional jurisdiction?

Held
The suit instituted after an unexplained delay of more than 22 years was clearly barred by limitation. The allegations of fraud and misrepresentation remained unsubstantiated and were rightly disbelieved by the subordinate courts. The mutation, having remained incorporated in the revenue records, carried a presumption of correctness which the respondents failed to rebut through credible evidence. Moreover, during this long period, third-party rights had also come into existence.

The impugned judgment and decree of the High Court were set aside, and the concurrent judgment and decree of the court below were restored. Appeal was allowed.

Additional Legal Principles Noted*
(b) S. 39, Limitation Act, 1908, First Schedule, Art. 91 — Fraudulent Transaction — Challenge to — Prescribed Limitation Period

Mandatory Requirements:
Where fraud is alleged in relation to an instrument or transaction, the party challenging such instrument or transaction is required to seek its cancellation within the limitation period prescribed by law.
_[P. 1027] F_

(c) Mutation — Long Standing Entries — Challenge to Mutation
A person who sleeps over his rights for decades cannot subsequently seek to unsettle long-standing entries in the revenue record and disturb settled rights of parties.
_[P. 1026] C
(d) Mutation — Limitation — Time-Barred Challenge
An unexplained delay renders a challenge untenable.
_[P. 1026] A

(e) Fraud
Fraud vitiates all solemn acts. Requirement of proof: An allegation of fraud cannot be accepted on mere assertion. It must be specifically pleaded and strictly proved through reliable evidence.
_[2027 D & E] [2011 SCMR 986]_

(f) S. 42 — Revenue Record — Challenge to — Limitation — Long Standing Entries Left Unchanged

Significance:
A plea of fraud cannot be invoked to circumvent the limitation or to unsettle long-standing entries in the revenue record. Such entries ought not to be disturbed lightly where rights have crystallized on the basis of the record.
_[P. 1028] H_
_[PLD 2015 SC 212]_

(g) S. 42 — Mutation — Presumption of Truth
Once a mutation is sanctioned and incorporated into the Jamabandi, it carries a statutory presumption of truth unless rebutted through strong and cogent evidence.
_[P. 1028] I_
_[PLD 1979 SC 890]_

(h) Belated Challenge Conduct of the Party
Silence for a long period reflects acceptance of ground realities.
(i) Procedural Irregularities in Mutation — Effect*
Even if certain procedural irregularities exist, they do not invalidate an otherwise established transaction.
_[2000 SCMR 519]_
(j)
Though mutation entries do not create title, where the underlying transaction is proved through credible evidence, technical defects cannot invalidate it.
_[PP. 1029, 1030] K & L_
_[2001 SCMR 593]_


19/08/2026

Self defense cannot be ruled out.



⚖️ Trial and Punishment of Juvenile Offenders In Simple Words which is easy to understand.Under our law, there is a dist...
19/08/2026

⚖️ Trial and Punishment of Juvenile Offenders
In Simple Words which is easy to understand.

Under our law, there is a distinct difference between the trial and the nature of punishment for a juvenile and for an adult.

With regard to juveniles, the Juvenile Justice System Act defines
a "CHILD" any person below eighteen years of age

"AGE DETERMINATION"
If a person is under 18 years of age, even by one day, his/her age shall be determined. The age shall be determined on the basis of the B-Form or any other document determining age, such as a School Certificate, etc.

"TRAIL"
If a child is under 18 years of age, even by one day, his/her trial shall *not* be conducted in the routine Trial Court where adults are tried.

"DETENTION "
Similarly, if any such child under 18 years of age is detained, either during trial or after conviction, he/she shall be kept separate from adult offenders. Separate facilities have been established for this purpose, wherein juveniles are categorized according to age. They are not kept with adults.

"CLASSIFICATION "

If a juvenile, i.e., a person under 18 years of age, commits an offence, the Juvenile Justice System Act*classifies such offences into *three categories:
1. Minor Offence
2. Major Offence
3. Heinous Offence

1. MINOR OFFENCE:
The Act provides that if the offence committed is punishable under the Pakistan Penal Code with imprisonment up to three years, it shall be deemed a "Minor Offence".

BAIL IN MINNOR OFFENCE:
If bail is applicable in such an offence, then bail is a matter of right. The Court has no discretion in this regard. Whenever the juvenile appears before the Court, the Court, by virtue of his/her right to bail, shall grant bail.

2. MAJOR OFFENCES:

For Major Offences and Minor Offences, a separate procedure is prescribed.

3. HENEOUS OFFENCE:

If the juvenile has committed a Heinous Offence, i.e., an offence punishable with imprisonment for more than seven years, then he/she shall be treated differently.

BAIL IN CASE OF LESS THAN 16 YEARS OF AGE:

In such cases, the Court shall consider the age of the child at the time of commission of the offence, not his/her present age.
If the juvenile was 16 years of age or above* at the time of commission of the crime, the Court shall then decide whether or not to grant bail.
But if the juvenile was below 16 years of age at the time of commission of the crime, then even a Heinous Offence shall be considered bailable, and bail shall be granted.

There is also a judgment of the Supreme Court on this point. The Court held that if the juvenile was exactly 16 years of age on the day the offence was committed, he/she shall be entitled to the same relief as a juvenile below 16 years.

ONE DAY ABOVE 16 YEARS :

if the juvenile was even one day above 16 years on the day of commission of the offence, the Court shall then consider whether or not to grant bail.

Furthermore, the Court may also order the juvenile to be sent to a
Reformatory Institution for the purpose of rehabilitation.

NO DEATH PENALTY.
Additionally, the law provides that if a minor above 16 years of age commits a Heinous Offence, such as murder, unlike the routine imposition of Death Penalty under Section 302 PPC, the law states that no death penalty shall be awarded to a minor under 18 years of age.

19/08/2026

Offshoot of the Main Case..

فوجداری قانون اس بات پر زور دیتا ہے کہ ہر فوجداری مقدمے کا جائزہ اس کے مخصوص حقائق اور حالات کی روشنی میں لیا جائے.2020 ...
19/08/2026

فوجداری قانون اس بات پر زور دیتا ہے کہ ہر فوجداری مقدمے کا جائزہ اس کے مخصوص حقائق اور حالات کی روشنی میں لیا جائے.
2020 P.Cr.L.J 931

Claim/ Version کسی بھی دعویٰ یا موقف کو ثابت کرنے کی زمیداری مدعی پر ہوتی ہے کہ وہ ٹھوس اور قابل اعتماد مواد پیش کرے اور...
19/08/2026

Claim/ Version
کسی بھی دعویٰ یا موقف کو ثابت کرنے کی زمیداری مدعی پر ہوتی ہے کہ وہ ٹھوس اور قابل اعتماد مواد پیش کرے اور محض قیاس اور گمان پر مبنی کوئی دعویٰ بغیر ثبوت کے قانون اور حقائق کے منافی ہوگا

2016 P.Cr.L.J 1398

Call Data Record (CDR)کسی ٹھوس مواد کی عدم موجودگی میں کال ڈیٹا ریکارڈ ملزم کی مجرمیت یا عدم مجرمیت کا قطعہ ثبوت نہیں ہے...
19/08/2026

Call Data Record (CDR)
کسی ٹھوس مواد کی عدم موجودگی میں کال ڈیٹا ریکارڈ ملزم کی مجرمیت یا عدم مجرمیت کا قطعہ ثبوت نہیں ہے

2023 SCMR 383

There are three different phases of investigation First: Investigation (Police)Second: Administration Phase (Court)Third...
19/08/2026

There are three different phases of investigation
First: Investigation (Police)
Second: Administration Phase (Court)
Third: The executive phase when the order of the court or the tribunal are, executable or promulgated.

سول مقدمے کا زیر التوا ہونا فوجداری کارروائی میں روکاوٹ نہیں ہے ۔2007 YLR 2169
19/08/2026

سول مقدمے کا زیر التوا ہونا فوجداری کارروائی میں روکاوٹ نہیں ہے ۔
2007 YLR 2169

Address

District Courts Multan
Multan

Opening Hours

Monday 08:00 - 21:00
Tuesday 08:00 - 21:00
Wednesday 08:00 - 21:00
Thursday 08:00 - 21:00
Friday 08:00 - 21:00
Saturday 08:00 - 21:00

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Legal Aim posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share