Legal view

Legal view To provide legal assistance to the masses..

10/08/2026

2025 SCMR 776

اہم قانونی اصول:

1. نابالغ قانونی ورثاء کا دیت میں حصہ ہر حال میں محفوظ رہے گا، خواہ مقتول کے تمام قانونی ورثاء کے درمیان صلح یا راضی نامہ ہی کیوں نہ ہو گیا ہو۔

2. اگر مجرم مالی کمزوری کی وجہ سے دیت کی رقم ادا کرنے سے قاصر ہو تو قانون اسے مکمل طور پر بے سہارا نہیں چھوڑتا۔

3. PLD 2007 SC 315 (Government of Punjab v. Abid Hussain) میں سپریم کورٹ کی ہدایت پر وفاقی حکومت نے Diyat, Arsh and Daman Fund Rules, 2007 وضع کیے۔

4. ان قواعد کے تحت دیت، ارش یا دامان کی رقم ادا نہ کر سکنے والے قیدی/مجرم کے لیے چار طریقے موجود ہیں:

Soft Loan کی سہولت

Fund سے مالی امداد

Parole پر رہائی

ملازمت کے حصول میں سہولت

5. متاثرہ شخص/مجرم ان قواعد کے تحت قائم Administrative Committee سے رجوع کر سکتا ہے۔

6. اس کے علاوہ دفعہ 331 PPC کے تحت ٹرائل کورٹ سے دیت کی رقم اقساط میں ادا کرنے کی اجازت بھی طلب کی جا سکتی ہے۔

خلاصہ:
دیت کی ادائیگی میں مالی استطاعت نہ ہونا قانونی طور پر نظرانداز نہیں کیا گیا۔ قانون میں مالی معاونت، قرض، پیرول، ملازمت اور اقساط کے ذریعے دیت کی ادائیگی کے راستے موجود ہیں، جبکہ نابالغ ورثاء کا دیت میں حصہ کسی صورت ختم نہیں کیا جا سکتا۔

10/08/2026

PLD 2023 Sindh 321

Inheritance---Tarkah---Service benefits---Scope---Any service benefit that an employee is legally entitled to claim from his employer in his lifetime, or has become due and payable to him in his lifetime but has remained unpaid for any reason, shall be treated as his absolute right and thus shall form part of his Tarka h and shall be inheritable, according to the personal law of the deceased employee, by all his legal heirs according to their respective shares---Whereas, a service benefit, that had not fallen due to the deceased employee in his lifetime, or is a kind of grant, donation, bounty, concession and/or compensation by the employer, the amount thereof payable after the death of the employee shall be distributed only to those members of his family who are entitled for the same as per the prevailing rules and regulations of service or under the relevant and applicable provision(s) of law---Discretion to make rules and regulations for payment of any grant, donation, bounty, concession or compensation to any particular member or class of members of the family of the deceased employee, vests solely with the employer, provided such rules and regulations must not be inconsistent with or contrary to Shariah or any law for the time being in force.

Inheritance---Tarkah---Service benefits---Scope---Benevolent fund does not fall within the definition of such property of a deceased employee that could be deemed to have been owned by him at the time of his death nor could he claim the same during his lifetime as a matter of right; such grant or donation is payable to the employee after his retirement from service or to his legal heirs upon his death---Forced deduction of certain amount from the salary of the employee as contribution/donation for such fund shall not change the above position as after contributing/donating the fund, such amount does not remain the property of the employee; thus, benevolent fund cannot be treated as Tarkah---Said principle shall also apply to group insurance---Family pension and death gratuity, payable by the employer to the family members of its deceased employee as per the applicable service rules and regulations, are considered as grants/donations, and thus are not inheritable nor do they fall within the definition of Tarkah.

Inheritance---Tarkah---Service benefits---Scope---Service benefit falling under any of the categories of grant, donation, bounty, concession or compensation, payable after the death of the employee, shall not form part of his Tarkah---Only such beneficiary(ies) or nominee(s) shall be entitled to receive the same who were made beneficiary(ies) or nominee(s) under the prevailing rules and regulations of service or under the relevant and applicable provision(s) of law; and, other legal heir(s) of the deceased employee, not being beneficiary(ies) or nominee(s) of such service benefits, shall not be entitled to claim any share therein.

10/08/2026

It would be relevant to mention here that it is now well settled that the share of minor legal heirs in Diyat shall remain protected under all circumstances, regardless of whether a compromise has been reached by all legal heirs of the deceased.

So far as the issue of inability of convict to pay the amount of Diyat due to weak financial resources is concerned, in the case of Government of Punjab v. Abid Hussain (PLD 2007 SC 315) this Court issued directions to the Federal Government to frame rules on this matter. Consequently, the Rules i.e. Diyat, Arsh and Daman Fund Rules, 2007, were framed by the Federal Government under the mandate of section 338-G PPC.

These rules provide four types of remedies for convicts/inmates unable to pay the amounts of Diyat, Arsh or Daman subject to the terms and conditions specified therein, namely;

(i) provisions of Soft Loans,
(ii) grant out of the Fund,
(iii) release on Parole, and
(iv) facilitation for Jobs.

In such view of the mater, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the administrative committee constituted under the Rules for the management of the Fund. Similarly, the petitioner can also approach the Trial Court under section 331 PPC for payment of Diyat amount in installments.
2025 SCMR 776
Crl.M.A.714/2023
Tanvir Hussain v. The State

10/08/2026

2023 PCrLJ 1071
Topic: Circumstantial Evidence — Last Seen Evidence

آخری بار مقتول کے ساتھ ملزم کی موجودگی کا ثبوت قابلِ اعتماد تھا، گواہ نہ chance witness تھا نہ اس کی ملزم سے کوئی دشمنی تھی۔ CCTV نے بھی اس کی گواہی کو corroborate کیا۔ ملزم تقریباً 1:00 بجے مقتول کے ساتھ سویا ہوا دیکھا گیا اور تقریباً 2:30 بجے مقتول مردہ پایا گیا جبکہ ملزم غائب تھا۔ مقتول کے قریب وہ cement block بھی ملا جو CCTV میں ملزم کے پاس دیکھا گیا تھا۔
لہٰذا last seen evidence + CCTV + دیگر حالات نے prosecution case کو مکمل طور پر corroborate کیا اور conviction برقرار رہی۔
اہم نکتہ: Motive ثابت نہ ہونے کی وجہ سے death penalty کو life imprisonment میں تبدیل کیا گیا۔

09/08/2026

2023 SCMR 1002

Facts

The respondent filed a Family Suit for recovery of dower (Haq Mehr), dowry articles and maintenance. The petitioner, on the other hand, instituted a Civil Suit challenging the validity of certain entries in Columns 14, 16 and 19 of the Nikahnama (Marriage Register). The Civil Court and the Family Court decided both suits through a consolidated judgment. The matter ultimately reached the Supreme Court.

Held

1. Cases arising from different jurisdictions cannot be consolidated. A civil suit cannot be consolidated with a family suit, just as a civil matter cannot be consolidated with a criminal matter.

2. After the Family Courts (Amendment) Act, 2015 (Punjab), disputes relating to the validity or legality of entries in the Nikahnama fall exclusively within the jurisdiction of the Family Court.

3. A suit challenging the validity of any entry in the Nikahnama is a family matter, and if such a suit is filed before a Civil Court, it is liable to be treated as transferred to or deemed to have been instituted before the Family Court.

4. Since the petitioner's claim related to the validity of Nikahnama entries, the Family Court alone had jurisdiction to decide the matter.

5. The Supreme Court found no jurisdictional defect or legal infirmity in the judgments of the courts below and, therefore, dismissed the petition.

09/08/2026

2021 PLD 33 Lahore

--Section 52 Punjab Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967) ==== Entries in revenue record-- When entries of mutation get incorporated in Jamabandi (annual record) then it is presumed to be true until the contrary is proved or a new entry is lawfully substituted therefor.

09/08/2026

PLD 2026 Supreme Court 269
ملکیت کا ثبوت — انتقال اور ریونیو ریکارڈ

بنیادی الاٹمنٹ یا ٹائٹل دستاویز ثابت نہ ہو تو صرف انتقال، ریونیو ریکارڈ یا زبانی بیان سے ملکیت ثابت نہیں ہوتی۔ جرح میں دستاویز کا محض حوالہ دینا یا اسے صرف Exhibit کرنا بھی اس کے باقاعدہ ثبوت کا متبادل نہیں۔
اہم اصول:
“Mutation is not a document of title; foundational document must be proved.”
سپریم کورٹ نے سرکاری زمین کے تحفظ پر بھی زور دیا اور ہائی کورٹ کا فیصلہ کالعدم کرکے اپیلیٹ کورٹ کا فیصلہ بحال کردیا۔

09/08/2026

C.R No. 392-A of 2026
Muhammad Ashrafand others Vs Additional Assistant Commissioner (Revenue), Haripur and others.
Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 confers jurisdiction upon Civil Courts to entertain and adjudicate all suits of a civil nature, except those of which cognizance is expressly or impliedly barred by law. Thus, although the jurisdiction of Civil Courts in civil matters is plenary, it remains subject to statutory exclusions enacted by the Legislature. Where a special statute establishes a complete mechanism for the adjudication of particular disputes and expressly or impliedly excludes the jurisdiction of ordinary Civil Courts, the jurisdiction conferred under Section 9, C.P.C. stands excluded to that extent.
The Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Land Revenue Act, 1967 is one such special enactment. Section 172(1) thereof expressly provides that, except as otherwise provided in the Act, no Civil Court shall exercise jurisdiction in respect of any matter which the Government, the Board of Revenue, or any Revenue Officer is empowered by the Act to determine or take cognizance of. The legislative intent underlying this provision is to vest exclusive jurisdiction in the Revenue Authorities over matters specifically entrusted to them and to avoid parallel adjudication by Civil Courts.
The exclusion of Civil Court jurisdiction is made even more explicit by Section 172(2)(v) and (vi) of the Act, which specifically bar Civil Courts from entertaining suits relating to the framing of the record-of-rights, the preparation or attestation of documents included therein, and, more importantly, the correction of any entry in the record-of-rights, periodical record, or register of mutations. Under Section 39 of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Land Revenue Act, 1967, the expression \"record-of-rights\" includes the Khasra Girdawari, Jamabandi, and other periodical revenue records maintained under the Act.
A Khasra Girdawari is a periodical revenue record prepared by the Patwari recording possession, cultivation, crops, and other fiscal particulars relating to agricultural land. Such entries are maintained primarily for revenue administration and carry a statutory presumption of correctness unless and until they are altered or rebutted in the manner prescribed by law. Consequently, where the dispute pertains solely to the correction of entries in the Khasra Girdawari or any other record-of-rights, periodical record, or register of mutations, the Legislature has expressly vested exclusive jurisdiction in the Revenue Authorities, thereby excluding the jurisdiction of Civil Courts.
2026 PHC 4826

08/08/2026

2025 MLD 1085
Firearm wound---Blackening and burning---Distance of fire shot---Blackening and burning on wound caused by firearm only appears if shot has been fired from few inches---Fire shot from a distance of 5 feet cannot cause burning on wound.

08/08/2026

DEFAMATION ORDINANCE

2017 C L C 45

In this case the question before the High Court was whether a suit for damages on account of defamation resulting from alleged malicious prosecution was maintainable before the court of ultimate jurisdiction under S.9 of the C.P.C. or the
same could only be adjudicated under S.13 of the Defamation Ordinance, 2002. It was observed that S.13 of the Defamation Ordinance, 2002 prescribed the remedy to enforce a right before the District Court, however, the same did not contain any repealing or ouster clause regarding
jurisdiction of civil court to entertain a suit under the general law that was S.9 of the C.P.C. The apex Court has already clinched the said proposition authoritatively in the judgment reported as Ch. Zulfiqar Ali Cheema v. Farhan Arshad Mir PLD 2015 SC 134 and observed that the reading of the Ordinance as a whole did not preclude a person from initiating an action for damages under the law of Torts by filing a suit for damages under Civil Procedure Code, 1908.

Address

Mingora

Telephone

+923413785330

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Legal view posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Legal view:

Shortcuts

Share