Mehr Allah Ditta Naseem Jutt Law Associates

Mehr Allah Ditta Naseem Jutt Law Associates Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from Mehr Allah Ditta Naseem Jutt Law Associates, Lahore.

03/07/2022
13/05/2021

تمام گروپ ممبران اور تمام عالم اسلام کو عید الفطر کی مبارکباد۔۔
❤⚘❤⚘❤

04/05/2021
The Muslim Family Laws (Amendment) Act, 2021 bill introduced in National Assembly of Pakistan.
29/04/2021

The Muslim Family Laws (Amendment) Act, 2021 bill introduced in National Assembly of Pakistan.

سپریم کورٹ نے جسٹس قاضی فائز عیسیٰ کی نظرثانی درخواست منظور کرلی۔جسٹس عمرعطا بندیال کی سربراہی میں 10 رکنی فل کورٹ بینچ ...
26/04/2021

سپریم کورٹ نے جسٹس قاضی فائز عیسیٰ کی نظرثانی درخواست منظور کرلی۔

جسٹس عمرعطا بندیال کی سربراہی میں 10 رکنی فل کورٹ بینچ نے سپریم کورٹ میں جسٹس قاضی فائز عیسیٰ نظرثانی کیس کی سماعت کی۔

سماعت مکمل ہوجانے کے بعد بینچ کے سربراہ جسٹس عمرعطا بندیال نے ریمارکس میں کہا تھا کہ بینچ کو مشاورت کیلئے وقت درکار ہے، آدھے گھنٹے بعد بتائیں گے فیصلہ آج سنانا ہے یا کل سنایا جائے۔

سماعت میں حکومتی وکیل عامر رحمٰن نے عدالت کو بتایا کہ فروغ نسیم بیماری کے باعث آج نہیں آسکےوہ کل ذاتی حیثیت میں دلائل دینا چاہتے ہیں، اس پر سپریم کورٹ نے کہاکہ فروغ نسیم تحریری دلائل جمع کرادیں۔

جسٹس منصورعلی شاہ نے سماعت میں استفسار کیا کہ ہماراسوال یہ ہے کہ ایف بی آر کو بھیجنے کا حکم دیا بھی جاسکتا تھا یا نہیں،ہم کیس میں ایف بی آر رپورٹ کی قانونی حیثیت نہیں دیکھ رہے۔

جسٹس قاضی فائز عیسیٰ نے کہاکہ میں ان سوالات کو کلئیر کر دیتا ہوں، جسٹس عمرعطا بندیال کیس میں نیا پنڈورا باکس کھولنا چاہتے ہیں، بار بار یاد دہانی کراچکا وقت کم ہے، بینچ کے ایک ممبر کو 4 دن میں ریٹائر ہو جانا ہے،بلاوجہ عدالت کا وقت ضائع کیا جا رہا ہے۔

حکومتی وکیل عامر رحمٰن نے کہا کہ میں ان سوالات کے جوابات دے رہا ہوں جوعدالت نے مجھ سے کیے، جبکہ درخواست گزار بار بار کہہ رہے ہیں کہ میں عدالت کا وقت ضائع کر رہا ہوں۔

جسٹس مقبول باقرنے اپنے ریمارکس میں کہاکہ پہلے ہی کہہ چکے ہیں کہ عدالت ایف بی آر رپورٹ نہیں دیکھے گی۔

حکومتی وکیل ایڈیشنل اٹارنی جنرل عامر رحمٰن نے آج کی سماعت میں دلائل دیتے ہوئے کہاکہ جسٹس منصورعلی شاہ نےحق دعویٰ نہ ہونے کا سوال اٹھایا تھا،وفاقی حکومت کیس میں باضابطہ فریق ہے، عدالت نےوفاقی حکومت کونوٹس جاری کرکے جواب مانگا تھا۔

وکیل وفاقی حکومت نے کہاکہ وفاقی حکومت نے ریفرنس کالعدم ہونے پر نظرثانی نہیں کی، عدالت نے ریفرنس قانونی نکات میں بےاحتیاطی برتنے پر کالعدم کیا تھا،عدالت نے کہا تھا سرینا عیسیٰ کو وضاحت کا موقع دیے بغیر ریفرنس دائر کیا گیا۔

وکیل عامر رحمٰن نے کہاکہ عدالت کیس ایف بی آر کو نہ بھجواتی تو وفاقی حکومت نظرثانی اپیل دائر کرتی، حکومت کیس ایف بی آر کو بھجوانے کا دفاع کرنے میں حق بجانب ہے،وفاق کو یہ حق بھی حاصل ہے کہ وہ عدالتی احکامات کا دفاع کرے۔

ایڈیشنل اٹارنی جنرل نے کہاکہ ایک سوال جسٹس منیب اختر صاحب کی طرف سے پوچھا گیا تھا کہ نظرثانی درخواست منظور ہوگئی تو بھی کیاایف بی آر رپورٹ پر کارروائی ہوسکتی ہے؟ اس پر کہنا یہ ہے کہ اگر کسی فیصلے پر عملدر آمد ہوجائے تو نظرثانی کے باوجود وہ فیصلہ واپس نہیں ہوسکتا۔

وکیل عامر رحمٰن نے دلائل میں کہا کہ جسٹس عمر عطا بندیال کی طرف سے سوال پوچھا گیا تھا کہ کیا سپریم کورٹ سپریم جوڈیشل کونسل کو دستیاب معلومات کا جائزہ لینے سے روک سکتی ہے؟ اس پر جواب میں کہنا ہے کہ معلومات کےحصول کے بعد سپریم کورٹ سپریم جوڈیشل کونسل کو ہدایات جاری نہیں کرسکتی۔

ایڈیشنل اٹارنی جنرل نے کہاکہ آرٹیکل 211 کے تحت جوڈیشل کونسل کی کارروائی پر سوال نہیں اٹھایا جاسکتا۔

جسٹس یحیٰ آفریدی نے ریمارکس میں کہا کہ آپ اپنے پہلے دیے گئے دلائل کے خلاف دلائل دے رہے ہیں، سپریم کورٹ نےاکثریتی فیصلے میں سپریم جوڈیشل کونسل کو ہدایات جاری کیں،لگتا ہے آپ اپنے ہی کیس کےخلاف دلائل دے کر درخواست گزار کو فائدہ پہنچا رہے ہیں۔

جسٹس یحیٰ آفریدی نے ایڈیشنل اٹارنی جنرل سے مکالمہ میں کہاکہ آپ محتاط انداز میں دلائل دیں، ایڈیشنل اٹارنی جنرل نے کہاکہ میری دلیل یہ ہےکہ سپریم کورٹ نے تو سپریم جوڈیشل کونسل کو ہدایات جاری ہی نہیں کیں۔

ایڈیشنل اٹارنی جنرل عامر رحمٰن نے کہاکہ عدالتی فیصلے میں کسی غلطی کی نشاندہی نہیں کی جاسکتی، فیصلے میں قانونی غلطی ہو تو بھی نظر ثانی نہیں ہوسکتی، سپریم کورٹ کاکوئی حکم ایف بی آر پر اثرانداز نہیں ہوا۔

ایڈیشنل اٹارنی جنرل کے دلائل کے دوران جسٹس فائز عیسیٰ کی مداخلت کی کوشش کی تو جسٹس منظور احمد ملک نے جسٹس قاضی فائز عیسیٰ سے دلچسپ مکالمہ کرتے ہوئے کہاکہ قاضی صاحب میں نے متعدد بار آپ سے انگریزی زبان میں درخواست کی، قاضی صاحب کئی بار اردو زبان میں بھی آپ سے درخواست کی، اب لگتا ہے پنجابی زبان میں آپ سے درخواست کرنا پڑے گی، قاضی صاحب مہربانی فرمائیں، اپنی نشست پر بیٹھ جائیں، حکومتی وکیل کو دلائل دینے دیں۔

جسٹس فائز عیسٰی نے کہاکہ جسٹس منظور ملک نے پنجابی میں نہیں روکا، اس بات کا گلہ ہے،پنجابی میں کہوں گا تو ونج تے میں آیا، اس پر جسٹس منظور ملک نے کہاکہ آپ نے غلط پنجابی بولی، یہ ویسے سرائیکی زبان ہے، جسٹس فائز عیسیٰ نے کہاکہ میرے استاد نے مجھے غلط پنجابی سکھائی ہے۔

سپریم کورٹ نے کیس کی سماعت کے دوران ایڈیشنل اٹارنی جنرل پر اظہار ناراضگی کرتے ہوئے کہاکہ سپریم کورٹ نے 3 سوالات پوچھے تھے۔

ایڈیشنل اٹارنی جنرل نے کہاکہ درخواست گزارجج کا جواب دینا لازم ہے یا نہیں اس کا جواب قانون شہادت میں ہے،قانون شہادت کے آرٹیکل 122 کے تحت جس پر الزام لگایا ہے اسے جواب دینا پڑتا ہے،جسٹس منظور احمد ملک نے کہاکہ آپ غیرمتعلقہ دلیل دے رہے ہیں۔

جسٹس مظہرعالم نے کہاکہ ایڈیشنل اٹارنی جنرل صاحب قانون بھی واضح ہے اور ہمارے ذہن بھی بالکل کلئیر ہیں، جسٹس قاضی امین نے اٹارنی جنرل سے مکالمہ کرتے ہوئے کہا کہ زیر سماعت مقدمہ فوجداری یا دیوانی ٹرائل نہیں، ایسےنہ کریں، ہم نےپوری زندگی اسی قانون کو پڑھنے میں گزار دی۔

جسٹس عمرعطا بندیال نے کہاکہ جو جائیدادیں خریدی گئیں ان کے ذرائع کی تصدیق ایف بی آر کا کام ہے،موجودہ کیس میں تحقیقات سرینا عیسیٰ کے خلاف شروع ہوئیں، اس معاملے کو دبانا زبردستی ختم کرنے کے مترادف ہے، عدالتی ساکھ کا تقاضا ہے کہ اس مسئلے کو حل کیا جائے۔

جسٹس بندیال نے حکومتی وکیل سے مکالمہ کرتے ہوئے کہاکہ جسٹس فائز عیسیٰ کہتے ہیں کہ وہ سرینا عیسیٰ کی جائیدادوں کیلئے جوابدہ نہیں، اگر آپ ان3 سوالات کاجواب مثبت دیں گے تو جسٹس فائز عیسیٰ جوابدہ ہیں،اگر آپ ان 3 سوالات کے جوابات منفی دیں گے تو بات ختم، جسٹس فائزعیسیٰ نے ان 3 سوالات کے جوابات دینے سے انکار کیا۔

جسٹس فائزعیسیٰ کا جسٹس عمرعطا بندیال سے مکالمہ کرتے ہوئے کہاکہ آپ میرے منہ میں الفاظ ڈال کر بات نہ کریں، میں نے سوالات کا جواب دینے سے انکار نہیں کیا، میں نے صرف سوالات پر اعتراض اٹھایا تھا۔

سرینا عیسیٰ نے کہاکہ جسٹس عمرعطا بندیال اورجسٹس منیب اختر اپنے اہلخانہ کی جائیدادیں پبلک کریں،جسٹس عمرعطا بندیال کو ایک مشورہ ہے، جسٹس بندیال اور جسٹس منیب اختر احتساب میں بہت دلچسپی رکھتے ہیں، جسٹس عمر عطا بندیال اور جسٹس منیب اختر اپنے اور اپنی اہلیہ کے اثاثوں کی تفصیلات پبلک کریں،اس پر جسٹس عمرعطا بندیال نے کہاکہ میڈم پلیز، آپ خاموش ہوجائیں۔

جسٹس فائزعیسیٰ نے بینچ سےمکالمہ کرتے ہوئے کہاکہ میری دعا ہے جو مجھ پربیتی وہ آپ میں سے کسی پر نابیتے،آج یہاں عدلیہ کی آزادی کے لیے کھڑا ہوں، انہوں نے کل سے پھر میرا میڈیا ٹرائل شروع کردیا ہے، ان سے کہنا چاہتا ہوں عزت دیں، میں آج بھی ایک جج ہوں، ہمارے بچے بیویاں تو یہاں موجود ہیں۔

عدالت نے فریقین کے دلائل سن لینے کے بعد جسٹس قاضی فائز عیسیٰ نظرثانی درخواستوں پر سماعت مکمل کرلی۔
C.R.P.296/2020
Justice Qazi Faez Isa v. The President of Pakistan & others
26 -04-2021

PLJ 2021 SC 154[Original Jurisdiction]Present: Gulzar Ahmed, C.J., Ijaz ul Ahsan and Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel, JJ.Dr. S...
25/04/2021

PLJ 2021 SC 154
[Original Jurisdiction]
Present: Gulzar Ahmed, C.J., Ijaz ul Ahsan and Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel, JJ.
Dr. SHAHNAWAZ MUNAMI and others--Petitioners
versus
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and others--Respondents
Const. P. No. 64 of 2013, H.R.C. No. 8267-G of 2014 in Const. P. 64 of 2013, C.M.A. No. 2872 of 2017 in Const. P. 64 of 2013, H.R.C. No. 14017-P of 2018 in Const. P. 64 of 2013 and, Const. P. No. 77 of 2014, C.M.A. No. 10803 of 2018 in Const. P. 77 of 2014, H.R.C. No. 40739-P of 2018, H.R.C. No. 41415-P of 2018 H.R.C. No. 42482-P of 2018, Const. P. No. 54 of 2018, H.R.C. No. 41408-S of 2018, C.M.A. No. 10499 of 2018 in Const. P. 77 of 2014, C.M.A. No. 10500 of 2018 in Const. P.77 of 2014, C.M.A. No. 3068 of 2019 in Const. P.64 of 2013, C.M.A. No. 3069 of 2019 in Const.P.64 of 2013, C.M.A. No 3131 of 2019 in Const. P. 64 of 2013, C.M.A. No. 5239 of 2019 in Const. P.64 of 2013, decided on 14.7.2020.
(Under Article 184(3) of the Constitution of the Islamic
Republic of Pakistan, 1973).
Constitution of Pakistan, 1973--
----Art. 184(3)--Constitutional petition--Non-availability of reliable information regarding numbers of disable persons--Failure to take appropriate steps for facilitation of disabled people--Non-availability of basic facilities--Posts were laying vacant for disabled persons--Producing of false fabricated certificates--Lack of coordination and cooperation--Implementation of laws--Issuance of guidelines and directions by Supreme Court--Individual grievances--It was pointed out to us that Federal Govt. had failed to take appropriate steps to facilitate lives of people with disabilities by providing them education, jobs and medical facilities and ease their daily lives in a manner visualized in United Nations Convention (UNCRPD)--It was also pointed out that provisions of Ordinance, 1981 were not being implemented with regard to allocation of quota in jobs and dream of promoting inclusion in mainstream, social life, education and abolition of disenfranchisement of people with disabilities remained unfulfilled--Even basic facilities like obtaining special national identity cards were not available to persons with disabilities--It was noticed that a large number of posts reserved for persons with disabilities were either lying vacant or had been occupied by persons who though not disabled had produced false and fabricated certificates in order to get jobs on disability quotas-- According to reports submitted with this Court, said issue has been addressed and appropriate action is being taken--There is a lack of coordination and cooperation between Federal and Provincial Governments in implementing all laws relating to welfare of disabled persons--Broad framework of guidelines provided by this Court from time to time to ensure implementation of laws and providing Fundamental Rights to persons with disabilities are being followed and implemented by Federal as well as Provincial Governments--Process has been initiated and earnest efforts are being made to create an environment and framework where citizens with disabilities are given respect, protection and support and requisite facilities are also made available to provide them opportunities of getting education, training and a conducive environment where they can be assimilated in mainstream of society--There would be individual grievances which can be brought to notice of relevant agencies and appropriate fora which will address same in accordance with law and guidelines issued by this Court during course of these proceedings from time to time--Petition was disposed of. [Pp. 157, 158, 159 & 160] A, B, C, D & E
Mr. Raheel Kamran Sh., ASC and Mr. Mehmood A. Sheikh, AOR (absent) for Petitioner (in Const. P. 64 of 2013).
Mr. M. Qasim Mirjat, ASC/AOR for Petitioners (in Const. P.77 of 2014).
Mr. M. Iqbal Hashmi, ASC and M. Bilal for Petitioners (in C.M.A. No. 10803 of 2018)
Mr. Sajid Ilyas Bhatti, Additional Attorney General for Pakistan, Syed Abdul Kalam Ashrafi, Asstt. Commissioner, Mr. Junaid Akhlaq, J.S. (A/E) Ministry of Law Mr. Wajid Aziz Qureshi, S.O. for the Federation.
Mr. Niazullah Khan Niazi, A.G. for ICT.
Ch. Faisal Fareed, Addl. A.G. Pb., Mr. Tariq Ismail, L.O. (S.W.), M. Ashraf Janjua, Director (S.W.), Mr. Zahid Mehmood, L.O. (Labour), Mr. Adnan Bashir, L.O. (Spl. Education) and Mr. Aflan Khan, Dy. Director for Government of Punjab.
Mr. Shabbir Shah, Addl. A.G. (through video link from Karachi) and Mr. Farhan Ali, Dy. Director (PCRDP) for Government of Sindh.
Mr. M. Ayyaz Sawati, Addl. A.G. for Government of Balochistan.
Mr. Zahid Yousaf Qureshi, Addl. A.G. KP for Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
Malik Javed Iqbal Wains, Advocate Supreme Court and Raja Abdul Ghafoor, Advocate-on-Record for CDA.
Date of hearing: 14.7.2020.
Order
Ijaz-ul-Ahsan, J.--This Constitutional Petition was filed before this Court in 2013 seeking enforcement of Fundamental Rights guaranteed to citizens under the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 (“the Constitution”). It was filed by prominent Members of Disability Movement in Pakistan who had been striving hard for many years for the welfare of persons with disabilities in the country. It was stated that millions of Pakistani citizens suffering from various disabilities were being denied Fundamental Rights guaranteed to them under the Constitution.
2. This Court being guardian of the Fundamental Rights guaranteed to the citizens was approached under Article 184(3) of the Constitution. It was pointed out to us that global movement for rights of the disabled persons had resulted in drafting of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD). Pakistan had ratified the same. However, despite such ratification, disabled persons continue to suffer as most neglected, marginalized and unrepresented segment of the society who face serious and insurmountable barriers against their inclusion in the mainstream society.
3. We are also informed that no officially reliable information regarding the number of persons suffering from various disabilities was available. Although the Disabled Persons (Employment and Rehabilitation) Ordinance, 1981 (“the Ordinance, 1981”) is in the field, the said law has neither been updated periodically nor has the same been implemented. It also appears that Directorate General of Special Education was formed in 1985 for provision of Special Education to persons with disabilities in order to educate them to facilitate their assimilation in the mainstream but no significant progress seems to have been made. It further appears that the National Policy for Persons with Disabilities made in 2002 and the National Plan of Action, 2006 to implement the said Policy of 2002 has not produced the requisite results.
4. When hearing in this matter started, all stakeholders were summoned. We were assisted amongst others by the learned Attorney General for Pakistan as well as learned Advocate Generals of all four Provinces and the learned Advocate General, Gilgit-Baltistan who filed periodical reports on behalf of the Federal and Provincial Governments. Input from interested private citizens was also received and considered.
5. In the post Eighteenth Constitutional Amendment scenario, the subjects of Population Planning, Social Welfare, Mental Illness and Mental Retardation have devolved on the Provinces. Some legislation has taken place in the Provinces of Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Sindh and Balochistan are in the process of putting the requisite legislation in place. It is also significant to note that there is no reliable data regarding incidence of disabilities in Pakistan. However, according to the data furnished by Pakistan Poverty Alleviation Fund, 66% of persons with disabilities live in Rural areas, 28% are illiterate, 14% are employed and 70% are dependent on members of their families for financial support. It was pointed out to us that the Federal Government had failed to take appropriate steps to facilitate the lives of people with disabilities by providing them education, jobs and medical facilities and ease their daily lives in a manner visualized in the United Nations Convention (UNCRPD). It was also pointed out that provisions of the Ordinance, 1981 were not being implemented with regard to allocation of quota in jobs and the dream of promoting inclusion in mainstream, social life, education and abolition of disenfranchisement of people with disabilities remained unfulfilled. Even basic facilities like obtaining special national identity cards were not available to the persons with disabilities.
6. This matter was taken up at regular intervals owing to important issues raised and this Court on the basis of information furnished by all stakeholders passed orders and directed implementation. Appropriate directions were also issued relating to collection of data of the disabled persons on regular basis and in this regard Pakistan Bureau of Statistics was tasked with the responsibility to devise a suitable mechanism to do so. Directions were also issued not only to upload such data on the official website of the concerned Ministry but also to update it on periodical basis. Orders were passed directing the concerned Ministries and other Government Agencies to implement all applicable laws regarding employment of disabled persons in accordance with the quotas allocated in the law. It was noticed that a large number of posts reserved for persons with disabilities were either lying vacant or had been occupied by persons who though not disabled had produced false and fabricated certificates in order to get jobs on the disability quotas. Under directions of this Court, an exercise was undertaken to address the said situation. According to the reports submitted with this Court, the said issue has been addressed and appropriate action is being taken.
7. It was also pointed out to us that concessional travel rates by Train and Air were not being allowed to persons with disabilities. However, on our directions the requisite steps were taken and the grievances appear to have been redressed. We expect that the concerned Agencies will be vigilant to ensure that Pakistan Airlines as well as Pakistan Railways not only allow such concession but the availability of this facility is advertised through public service messages in the Print and Electronic Media with the assistance and consultation of PEMRA.
8. During the course of hearing, we have also noticed that there is a lack of coordination and cooperation between the Federal and Provincial Governments in implementing all laws relating to welfare of disabled persons. We are sanguine that every possible effort will be made to improve and streamline the coordination and cooperation of the Federal and Provincial Governments so that the relevant laws are not only made and updated but also vigorously implemented.
9. When this matter was taken up on 05.03.2020, copies of reports filed by the learned Attorney General for Pakistan and all four Provinces as well as Gilgit-Baltistan were examined. Some of the learned counsel had sought time to examine the reports and assist this Court in the matter. Copies of all reports were accordingly directed to be supplied to them.
10. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, some of the petitioners in person and the learned Law Officers appearing for the Federation as well as the Provinces. We are satisfied that the broad framework of guidelines provided by this Court from time to time to ensure implementation of laws and providing Fundamental Rights to persons with disabilities are being followed and implemented by the Federal as well as the Provincial Governments. Much more needs to be done. It is however encouraging to note that the process has been initiated and earnest efforts are being made to create an environment and framework where citizens with disabilities are given respect, protection and support and the requisite facilities are also made available to provide them opportunities of getting education, training and a conducive environment where they can be assimilated in the mainstream of the society.
11. Although the requisite guidelines and directions have been issued by this Court from time to time, we consider it appropriate to reiterate the same and incorporate them in a consolidated form in the final order of this Court. Accordingly, the following directions and guidelines are issued to the Federal and Provincial Governments and all concerned Ministries, Divisions, Departments, Agencies, Authorities and other entities working in connection with the affairs of the Federation, the Provinces or any local authorities:
i) All vacant posts in the employment quota of Federal Government as well as Provincial Governments should be advertised and filled. It must be ensured that disabled persons from the same area/region are accommodated/ appointed against regional quotas;
ii) The provisions of laws relating to rehabilitation and employment of the disabled persons be followed and implemented in letter and spirit;
iii) The Federal and Provincial Governments are directed to ensure establishment of grievance redressal mechanisms to redress grievances of disabled persons and awareness campaigns regarding availability of these grievance redressal mechanism be run;
iv) The Federal Government, Provincial Governments, PEMRA, PTV, PBA and PBS will raise awareness through public service broadcasts of programs or messages;
v) The Federal and Provincial Governments as well as development authorities shall ensure enforcement of the Accessibility Code, 2006;
vi) Road Transport Authorities are directed to ensure making public transport accessible for persons with disabilities;
vii) Pakistan Railways shall progressively build proper ramps at Train Stations;
viii) The transport and development authorities will ensure availability of accessible toilets at train stations, local bus stands, service areas of bus stations, motorways and highways;
ix) The transport and development authorities shall arrange for construction of ramps and arrange safe and reliable facilities for boarding of buses and trains by disabled persons;
x) The concerned authorities and agencies at the Federal as well as Provincial level shall arrangements for the following:
a) Availability of accessible parking and ramps at public parks; and
b) Provision of accessible washroom and ramps in malls, parks, public places.
xi) All development authorities will ensure enforcement of quota in allotment of residential plots and houses as provided in the relevant laws, rules and regulations;
xii) Directions are also issued to all concerned to implement order of this Court dated 11.10.2018 in letter and spirit; and
xiii) Pakistan Bureau of Statistics in consultation with NADRA and other departments and agencies of the Federal and Provincial Governments shall publish and periodically update, complete, accurate and updated figures and statistics regarding persons with disabilities and upload the same on its website.
12. We are also mindful of the fact that there would be individual grievances which can be brought to the notice of the relevant agencies and the appropriate fora which will address the same in accordance with law and the guidelines issued by this Court during the course of these proceedings from time to time.
13. In this view of the matter, no further proceedings are required in this constitutional petition. Accordingly, the same along with all connected C.M.As. are disposed of.
(Y.A.) Petition disposed of

14/04/2021

تمام گروپ ممبران کو رمضان کریم کی مبارکباد۔۔۔
❤❤❤

Address

Lahore

Telephone

+923004846544

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Mehr Allah Ditta Naseem Jutt Law Associates posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Mehr Allah Ditta Naseem Jutt Law Associates:

Share