Atty. Christopher John I. Aldueso

Atty. Christopher John I. Aldueso ​At Aldueso Law, we don't just practice law—we honor the discipline it requires. Fiat Justitia. Let Justice Be Done! ⚖️ Breeder, scholars

18/05/2026
18/05/2026

⚠️ URGENT NOTICE FROM THE IBP NATIONAL OFFICE ⚠️

The Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) reminds the public to always verify the credentials of anyone claiming to provide legal services or representing themselves as connected to any court or government agency.

We are officially warning the public regarding an individual using the name "Atty. Allyssa Ann Nordstrome Agustin." Please be informed that this individual is NOT authorized by, employed at, or affiliated with the government and legal offices she claims a connection to.

Protect yourself from unauthorized legal transactions and misrepresentation. Before paying any fees or sharing case details, it is your right to:
✅ Check the official Supreme Court Roll of Attorneys.
✅ Demand to see their Roll Number, IBP Number, and current MCLE compliance.
✅ Contact our National Office or your local IBP Chapter to confirm their standing.

Do not fall victim to individuals refusing to show proper identification. Report suspicious transactions and preserve your evidence.

Contact the IBP to verify legal credentials today:
📞 Helpdesk: 8634-4696 / 8634-4697
📱 Viber: 0919-095-5859
📧 Email: [email protected]

Mag-ingat. Mag-verify. Huwag basta magtiwala sa nagpapakilalang abogado. ⚖️

10/05/2026

The has acquitted a man charged with violence against women and their children, or VAWC, for allegedly refusing to provide financial support to a child not proven to be his, emphasizing that a legal duty to provide financial support arises only after filiation or paternity has been established.

In a Decision written by Associate Justice Japar B. Dimaampao, the SC’s Third Division reversed the rulings of the Regional Trial Court and the Court of Appeals, which found the accused guilty of economic abuse under Republic Act No. 9262, or the 𝘈𝘯𝘵𝘪-𝘝𝘪𝘰𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘈𝘨𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵 𝘞𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘊𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘯 𝘈𝘤𝘵 𝘰𝘧 2004 (𝘈𝘯𝘵𝘪-𝘝𝘈𝘞𝘊 𝘈𝘤𝘵).

The case arose from a complaint filed by a woman against her former boyfriend, accusing him of refusing to provide financial support for her child.

The accused consistently denied he was the father, claiming that the child was born only eight months after they last had sexual relations.

During trial, the woman presented the child’s birth certificate as evidence. However, the portion indicating the father’s name, was marked "𝘕/𝘈" and left unsigned.

The woman also admitted in court that the accused refused to give financial support because he doubted that he was the child’s father.

In reversing the accused’s conviction, the SC explained that to convict a person for economic abuse under Section 5(i) of the 𝘈𝘯𝘵𝘪-𝘝𝘈𝘞𝘊 𝘈𝘤𝘵, the prosecution must show the following: (1) the victim is a woman and/or her child; (2) the woman is the offender’s wife or partner, or someone with whom the offender has a common child; (3) the offender refused to give financial support due; and (4) the refusal was intended to cause mental or emotional suffering.

In this case, the SC ruled that the prosecution failed to prove two essential elements: that the accused and the woman share a common child, and that the refusal to provide support was done to inflict psychological harm.

As the accused’s paternity was not proven in this case, no legal obligation to provide support could be imposed.

Read the full text of the Press Release at https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/?p=164663.

Read the full text of the Decision at https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/?p=164655.

Copying of this content is subject to the SC PIO’s Credit Attribution Policy: https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/credit-attribution.

Your shield in court. ⚖️ 🛡️
30/04/2026

Your shield in court. ⚖️ 🛡️

Feeling inspired by the pillars of justice today. ⚖️
23/04/2026

Feeling inspired by the pillars of justice today. ⚖️

21/04/2026

The will continue its oral arguments tomorrow, April 21, 2026, at 9:30 a.m., on the consolidated cases of:

•G.R. No. 271059 (Lagman v. Congress of the Philippines);
•G.R. No. 271347 (Pimentel v. Bersamin);
•G.R. No. E-02472 (Filipinos for Peace, Justice and Progress Movement Inc. v. House of Representatives); and
•G.R. No. E-04036 (Erice v. Senate)

Listen to the live audio stream:

YouTube: https://youtube.com/live/Ws9hsYYGkTQ?feature=share

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/share/1DiZb81fJ1/

21/04/2026

Newly uploaded pleading in current cases involving public interest:

G.R. No. E-05903 (Atty. Hue Jyro U. Go, Atty. Micah Lorelle P. De Guzman, and Atty. Jake O. Leoncini v. House of Representatives, Committee on Justice chaired by Hon. Gerville R. Luistro and The House of Representatives, headed by Speaker, Hon. Faustino G. Dy, III)

Petition for Certiorari: https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/?p=163765

Copies of recent pleadings and orders in cases involving public interest are regularly uploaded to the Current Cases page of the website. SCAN the QR Code for the latest uploads.

Officially commissioned. 🖋️​To sign, to seal, and to deliver justice. ⚖️ For immediate assistance or to schedule a consu...
15/04/2026

Officially commissioned. 🖋️
​To sign, to seal, and to deliver justice. ⚖️

For immediate assistance or to schedule a consultation, please feel free to contact us directly:
📲 Mobile: 0976 074 4466
📩 Email: [email protected]
🏢 Office: Unit 506, 5th Floor, PPI Building (above Pag-IBIG), EDSA Bagong Barrio, Caloocan City

Justice is now moving.⚖️
08/04/2026

Justice is now moving.⚖️

Address

Unit 506, 5th Floor, PPI Building (above Pag-IBIG Caloocan), EDSA Bagong Barrio
Quezon City
1400

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Atty. Christopher John I. Aldueso posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Atty. Christopher John I. Aldueso:

Share