https://www.facebook.com/474559029083938/

Vales Law Office, Colours Town Center, Alabang-Zapote Road, Las Piñas (2026)

20/06/2025

When Caution Comes Too Late: Negligence, Fault, and Responsibility

In Preciolita V. Corliss v. Manila Railroad Co. (G.R. No. L-21291, March 28, 1969), the Supreme Court was faced with a tragic question: who bears the blame when danger is obvious, safety measures are within reach, and yet an accident still happens?

Ralph Corliss, just 21 years old, died when his jeep collided with a train at a crossing near Clark Air Force Base close to midnight. His widow brought a case for damages, arguing that the railroad company was responsible.

It was later found that Corliss had tried to beat the train across the tracks. The facts were clear: the train had sounded its whistle; the crossing was familiar; and, the risk was not hidden. Corliss had enough time to stop but chose not to.

At the heart of the ruling is a basic principle of tort law: negligence is not measured in the abstract, but in relation to what a reasonable person would have done in the same situation. The law does not expect perfection; but it does expect care, especially when the stakes are high.

As the Court explained, “Where the danger is great, a high degree of care is necessary.” When that care is lacking, and injury results, the responsibility may rest with the one who failed to act prudently.

While companies and institutions have duties to ensure public safety, these responsibilities do not cancel out a person’s own obligation to exercise caution. Before liability can be assigned to another, it must be shown that they themselves failed to take reasonable care.

In the end, this case reminds us that negligence isn't simply about the presence of harm: it’s about how and why that harm occurred. The law recognizes the difference between a true accident and a consequence of one’s own poor judgment.

For anyone navigating questions of liability, whether in transportation, events, or business, Corliss offers an important lesson: in matters of safety, responsibility is shared. And when one fails to take the precautions that the situation clearly demands, the law is unlikely to shift that burden elsewhere.

Disclaimer: This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For legal guidance specific to your situation, please consult a lawyer.

05/06/2025

Unpaid Amilyar? Real Property Tax Amnesty in Effect Until July 5, 2026

Through Memorandum Circular No. 003-2025, the Bureau of Local Government Finance confirmed that the tax amnesty under Section 30 of Republic Act No. 12001, or the 'Real Property Valuation and Assessment Reform Act' (RPVARA), is now in effect—even without a local ordinance from the concerned LGU.

This nationwide amnesty covers all penalties, surcharges, and interest on unpaid real property taxes—including those related to the Special Education Fund, Idle Land Tax, and other special levies—incurred prior to July 5, 2024.

Taxpayers with delinquent real estate can avail of this relief until July 5, 2026.

Although LGUs may issue ordinances to specify payment procedures, the absence of such measures does not delay or prevent the amnesty’s implementation.

This is a major opportunity for owners of delinquent properties to clean up their tax records without the burden of interest and penalties. It can also help clear the way for future sales, development, or financing of these properties.

20/05/2025

The (SC) has reiterated that once a job offer is accepted, an employer-employee relationship is already formed. Employers cannot just claim redundancy to justify terminating workers – they must present clear proof that a valid redundancy program is in place.

In a Decision written by Associate Justice Alfredo Benjamin S. Caguioa, the SC’s Third Division found that Alltech Biotechnology (Alltech) illegally dismissed Paolo Landayan Aragones (Aragones) for failing to prove there was redundancy in the company.

Alltech had offered Aragones the position of Swine Technical Manager - Pacific, with a monthly salary of PHP 140,000. He accepted the offer and resigned from his previous job.

Before Aragones’ start date, however, Alltech informed him that the position had been abolished due to a global restructuring. Alltech offered him the amount of PHP 140,000 as goodwill payment. Aragones then filed a complaint for illegal dismissal.

The SC ruled that the employment contract was perfected as soon as Aragones signed the job offer. The delay in his start date merely postponed the obligations of Aragones to report for work, and of Alltech to pay his salary.

However, the SC emphasized that employers must provide solid evidence to justify terminating an employee due to redundancy, which Alltech failed to provide.

Alltech only submitted an affidavit from its Vice President stating that the company decided to shift from regional to local support to better respond to its customers’ needs.

The SC found the statement vague and unsupported by other documents. It did not explain how or why certain positions like Aragones’ were removed. It thus ordered Alltech to pay Aragones backwages and separation pay.

Read the full text of the Press Release at https://tinyurl.com/38vp842u.

Read the full text of the Decision at https://tinyurl.com/2tfywuhu.

Copying of this content is subject to the SC PIO’s Credit Attribution Policy: https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/credit-attribution-policy/.

16/05/2025

One Month Left: Estate Tax Amnesty Ends on June 14, 2025

If your loved one passed away on or before May 31, 2022 (even as far back as the 1970s, 1980s, or 1990s), you have until June 14, 2025 to settle the estate tax due under the amnesty program at a reduced rate and without penalties or interest. This applies if there are still assets such as parcels of land, house and lots, condominium units, vehicles, shares of stock, or other properties that remain under your deceased loved one’s name.

Failing to avail of the amnesty means reverting to the regular estate tax computation, which imposes a 25% surcharge and a 12% annual interest on unpaid taxes. For estates of decedents who passed away prior to the TRAIN Law (enacted around 2018), a higher 20% annual interest may also apply. These penalties can significantly increase the total tax due. Moreover, until the estate tax is settled, you may be unable to legally transfer titles or dispose of the inherited assets.

The amnesty provides a flat 6% estate tax rate, free from penalties and interest, making it significantly more affordable than regular rates. The minimum estate tax amnesty payment is only Php 5,000, even for older estates with limited declared value.

With just a few weeks left, now is the time to settle and secure your family’s estate matters before the deadline passes.

09/05/2025

Money Debts after Death?

When a parent passes away, we’re often left not only with memories and responsibilities, but also with questions—sometimes legal, often financial. There are cases where a parent leaves behind not just property and savings, but also a sizable bank loan. The natural question becomes: does the family now have to pay for it?

The answer lies in how our laws treat debt after death. A person’s obligations do not disappear upon their passing, but neither do they become automatically chargeable to the heirs (in their personal capacity). For money debts specifically, these are charged against the estate—the sum of assets, properties, and rights left behind. Creditors may file a claim on money debts, but only up to the value of what was left. If the estate is insufficient to cover the debt, the unpaid portion remains uncollected.

Under our Civil Code, rights and obligations transfer through succession, unless the obligation is personal. So when an heir receives property (maybe, a plot of land) that property may be liquidated first to satisfy any outstanding money obligations before it becomes theirs in full. What is passed on is not only the value of the assets but also the obligation to settle them, within legal limitations.

In practice, this means that heirs are not personally liable for money debts beyond what the deceased left behind. The obligation attaches to the estate, not to the individual. Any creditor must claim against the estate during its settlement.

In sum, debts, like property, forms part of a person’s legacy—but it is the estate of the deceased, in practice, that carries the responsibility.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. If you need legal assistance, consult a legal professional.

11/04/2025

Selling Real Estate Regularly? Make Sure You’re Filing the Right Forms.

If you're engaged in the business of buying and selling real property and registered with the BIR as a taxpayer engaged in the real estate business, the Bureau’s latest issuance offers some important guidance.

Revenue Memorandum Circular (RMC) No. 31-2025 dated 7 April 2025 clarifies what tax returns must be filed for every sale of real property classified as an ordinary asset, and aims to put to rest the confusion that sometimes surrounds these transactions.

One of the most notable updates in the circular is the clear instruction that BIR Form No. 2307, which many sellers have long used as proof of creditable withholding tax (CWT), is no longer used for sales of real property made in the ordinary course of business. Instead, sellers must now rely exclusively on BIR Form No. 1606 as proof of creditable withholding tax paid. This form should be filed for each sale and attached to the seller’s income tax return as evidence of the CWT withheld and paid. Sellers can no longer file one return to cover multiple transactions; each sale must be documented separately.

In addition to BIR Form No. 1606 for creditable withholding tax, sellers must also file BIR Form No. 2000-OT to report and pay the documentary stamp tax due (DST) on the transaction. These filings are mandatory for every sale before the Bureau can issue the electronic Certificate Authorizing Registration (eCAR), which is required to transfer the title to the buyer.

The RMC also tackles situations where the buyer finances the purchase through a loan from a bank or other lending institution such as PAG-IBIG.

When a seller receives payment from a financing institution under this arrangement, the payment is considered part of the seller’s gross sales and is subject to twelve percent (12%) VAT. In this case, the seller must issue a sales invoice to the buyer and an acknowledgment receipt or official receipt to the financing institution, properly reflecting the VAT. This is a reminder that VAT is not avoided merely because payment comes through financing.

Moreover, the RMC reiterates that any additional charges billed by the seller, such as transfer fees, registration fees, processing fees, and similar charges, are also subject to income tax and must be assessed with twelve percent (12%) output VAT. These are considered part of the seller’s taxable business activities and must be treated accordingly in the books and tax filings.

For real estate sellers, staying on top of these updated requirements is essential. Using the right forms, keeping documentation consistent, and properly reflecting taxes in your returns can help avoid costly errors and delays.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For guidance specific to your situation, it’s best to consult a qualified professional.

01/04/2025

Take Advantage of the New VAT-Free Policy for Non-Resident Tourists

The Philippine government has introduced a valuable opportunity for businesses catering to international tourists. Under the newly issued Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) for Republic Act No. 12079, foreign visitors can now shop VAT-free on eligible purchases—a move designed to boost tourist spending and give businesses a much-needed competitive edge.

Non-resident tourists holding foreign passports can enjoy VAT-free shopping for goods worth Php 3,000 and above per single invoice. This benefit applies exclusively to retail and tangible items, such as non-food consumables and personal use items.

Qualified goods under this policy include a wide range of popular shopping categories, such as clothing and apparel, jewelry, watches, beauty products, electronics, home décor, furniture, sporting goods, toys, and other retail items for personal use. Perishable goods, food products, and services are not covered under the VAT-free scheme.

This new policy offers particular benefits to local brands engaged in selling qualified tangible retail goods (mentioned above). With more tourists expected to take advantage of tax-free shopping, accredited establishments stand to attract a larger volume of high-spending visitors.

To participate, your establishment must be accredited by a VAT Refund Service (VRS) operator, a private entity appointed to handle VAT refund processing for non-resident tourists. Accreditation may involve training provided by the VRS operator, who will supply the necessary hardware and software to ensure smooth processing of VAT refunds.

Becoming an accredited VAT-free store positions your business as a preferred shopping destination for foreign tourists eager to enjoy tax-free purchases. If your business offers qualified goods, this initiative presents a valuable opportunity to attract more customers, increase your sales, and stay ahead of the competition.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. If you need legal assistance, consult a legal professional.

13/03/2025

Buying Land? A TCT Alone Might Not Protect You.

You’ve worked hard and you're finally ready to buy property. Manong seller (or his agent) hands you the Transfer Certificate of Title (TCT), and everything looks in order. Excited to close the deal, you push through—only to later be notified that the land might belong to someone else. The title you relied on was reconstituted after being declared lost, obtained through fraudulent means. Now, you're in a legal battle, and your investment is at risk.

A recent Supreme Court ruling serves as a strong reminder: buyers dealing with lost and reconstituted TCTs cannot claim to be innocent purchasers for value if they do not check the Registry of Deeds records. In this case, the buyer relied solely on the TCT despite annotations showing it had been lost and reconstituted. These annotations are public warnings of possible claims or irregularities and should have prompted further investigation. Had the buyer verified the title’s history, checked for pending disputes, and requested additional documentation from the Registry of Deeds, they could have avoided this costly mistake.

Real estate isn’t cheap, and purchasing property is a major financial commitment. That’s why due diligence goes beyond simply looking at a title. Checking the tax declarations and real property tax payments, as well as ocular inspections, must be done. Even seemingly minor inconsistencies should raise concerns. Professional assistance can uncover hidden risks that aren’t immediately obvious and help ensure that the property is free from encumbrances or adverse claims.

For those who already own property, ensuring that their title is secure is just as important. Lost TCTs must be formally reconstituted through legal proceedings and properly annotated at the Registry of Deeds—otherwise, the property could become vulnerable to fraudulent claims or illegal transfers.

Skipping due diligence is a gamble that could lead to financial loss, legal disputes, and even the risk of losing your property altogether. Before signing anything, verify the title, confirm the seller’s legitimacy, and ensure the records match their representations. With the high stakes involved in real estate transactions, having a professional review everything may be the best way to prevent costly mistakes before they happen.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

06/03/2025

Protecting Your Legacy: How Insurance Proceeds Bypass Estate Taxes

A 200-square-meter residential lot in Pasay today can be worth around ₱10 million to ₱15 million. If you pass away owning such property, your heirs could face an estate tax of ₱300,000 to ₱600,000 (even after applying the ₱5 million standard deduction). This tax must be settled before your heirs can transfer the title under their names. Note also that estate taxes are based on fair market value at the time of death, rising property values could mean an even higher tax bill in the future.

Looking at these numbers, it’s easy to see how estate taxes can take a significant portion of what you leave behind, often at a time when your family is already dealing with loss.

But not all assets are taxed the same way. While most properties owned by the deceased at the time of death are subject to estate tax, life insurance pay-outs are treated differently and can provide a way to pass on wealth without additional tax burdens.

Unlike other assets that must go through estate settlement, proceeds from life insurance policies do not form part of the gross estate. These pay-outs go directly to the designated beneficiaries and are not included in the taxable estate, ensuring that the full amount reaches your loved ones without additional tax liabilities.

Another key feature is that life insurance proceeds allow you to specify exactly who receives what, giving you more control over how your assets are distributed. Unlike other properties, which may be divided according to inheritance laws, insurance pay-outs go directly to the individuals you name in the policy without the complications of estate settlement.

Why this matters:

Understanding how life insurance proceeds are treated in estate taxation can help families prepare for the future. If insurance proceeds are available, they can provide immediate financial support for heirs, help cover estate settlement costs, and ensure that more of your hard-earned assets go to the people you intend. With careful planning, life insurance can be a valuable tool in managing estate obligations and securing your family’s financial well-being, especially as property values and estate tax liabilities continue to rise.

If you have questions about estate planning, you may message us for inquiries.

This article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice.

27/02/2025

How ignoring a BIR audit can lead to imprisonment.

With tax season approaching, businesses should be reminded of the possibility of a BIR tax audit at some point. When your business is audited, the process starts with the issuance of a Letter of Authority (LOA), usually accompanied by an initial request for books of accounts and supporting documents.

If a taxpayer fails to comply, a second and final request follows shortly. Continued non-compliance leads to a Subpoena Duces Tecum (Subpoena), legally compelling the taxpayer to produce the required records.

Ignoring a Subpoena is a serious matter. Failure to obey summons is a criminal offense that can result to imprisonment and fines. If the taxpayer is a corporation, the case will be filed not just against the company but also against its responsible officers, such as the president, chief financial officer, treasurer, or finance head. This makes key officers personally liable, extending the risk beyond just tax penalties.

While the criminal case is ongoing, the tax audit can still move forward. If a taxpayer does not provide any supporting documents for claimed expenses, the BIR may apply the Best Evidence Obtainable Rule, which allows them to disallow 50% of expenses due to lack of proof. This results in a substantial increase in taxable income and a significantly higher tax liability.

In our experience, this usually happens because taxpayers fail to participate in the audit process, either by disregarding document requests or refusing to submit adequate records. Without participation, the BIR proceeds with its assessment based on whatever information is available, often leading to highly unfavorable assessments that are difficult to dispute.

Why this matters to your business?

To avoid unnecessary tax exposure and legal risks, taxpayers should:

1. Maintain complete and organized financial records throughout the year (not just when an audit begins).
2. Ensure participation in the audit process by submitting required documents on time.
3. Hire an accounting or tax professional before an audit, ensuring compliance and proper reporting from the start.

Ignoring a BIR audit request is not just about taxes—it can lead to severe financial and legal consequences, including potential criminal liability. Preparing in advance and actively participating in the process ensures that your business stays compliant.

Vales Law Office

20/06/2025

05/06/2025

20/05/2025

16/05/2025

09/05/2025

11/04/2025

01/04/2025

13/03/2025

06/03/2025

27/02/2025

Address

Website

Alerts

Shortcuts

Share

Category