Top-Notch Echelon Pace Chamber Lp 7377295

Top-Notch Echelon Pace Chamber Lp 7377295 We offer unmatched expertise never equaled in litigation, intellectual property, legal conveyancing, and corporate services. provision of all legal services.

We have advised a wide range of corporate organizations on legal and regulatory compliance matters.

Revocation of Omoyele Sowore bail by missing a single court sitting after the court failed to sit on a previous adjourne...
22/06/2026

Revocation of Omoyele Sowore bail by missing a single court sitting after the court failed to sit on a previous adjourned date does not reflect the justice of his case.
The likelihood of a fair trial of his case has been eroded with due respect.
Sowore has attended his trial religiously. Therefore, presumption of regularity on his attendance for his trial ought to inure in his favour.

The Federal High Court in Abuja has ordered the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to deregister the Afric...
15/06/2026

The Federal High Court in Abuja has ordered the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to deregister the African Democratic Congress (ADC) and four other political parties.
The other political parties the court directed the electoral body to deregister are the Action Peoples Party (APP), Action Alliance (AA), Accord Party (AP), and Zenith Labour Party (ZLP).
The court order followed a judgment delivered by Justice Peter Lifu.
The National Forum of Former Legislators had, in the suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/2637/2026, prayed the court to determine whether INEC has a constitutional obligation to remove political parties that fail to meet the electoral performance thresholds set out in Section 225A of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), as reinforced by the Electoral Act 2022 and INEC’s regulations.
It was the position of the plaintiff that the five political parties listed as defendants in the matter had persistently failed to meet the constitutional benchmarks required to retain their registration.

The former legislators stressed that the requirements include winning at least 25 per cent of votes in a state during a presidential election or securing at least one elective seat at the national, state, or local government level.

They told the court that the ADC and the four other parties performed poorly in both the 2023 general elections and by-elections conducted by INEC, thereby failing to win seats across key tiers of government.

The litigants insisted that the continued existence of the ADC and the other defendants as recognised political parties is unlawful and undermines the integrity of the country’s electoral system.

Among other reliefs, the plaintiff urged the court to declare that INEC is duty-bound to deregister such parties.
It further urged the court to compel the commission to deregister the five political parties before preparations for the 2027 elections advance further.
Beyond declaratory reliefs, the plaintiff prayed the court to restrain the five affected parties from participating in general elections or engaging in political activities such as campaigns, rallies, and primaries.
It also sought a court injunction restraining INEC from recognising or dealing with the parties in any official capacity unless and until they strictly comply with constitutional provisions.

The judgment may affect the chances of candidates of the affected political parties, including former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, to contest the 2027 presidential poll.

The NBA president further criticised the recurring requirement that sureties must be senior civil servants on Grade Leve...
05/06/2026

The NBA president further criticised the recurring requirement that sureties must be senior civil servants on Grade Levels 16 or 17 and owners of properties worth hundreds of millions of naira
According to him, appellate courts have already condemned such practices.
Referencing the Court of Appeal judgment in Dasuki v. Director-General, State Security Service & Ors (2019) LPELR-49182 (CA), Osigwe noted that the court described the requirement for serving public officers as mandatory sureties as inconsistent with civilised legal systems.
The Court observed that such requirements are unknown to civilised legal systems and run contrary to public service regulations,” he said.
The Court further noted that expecting a public servant on Grade Level 16 to own property worth N100million would not only be unrealistic but could also conflict with public service rules and anti-corruption objectives.”

Osigwe also pointed to Section 165(1) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015, which provides that while courts have discretion in granting bail, such conditions must not be excessive.

He warned that impossible bail conditions amount to a denial of bail in practice and contribute significantly to overcrowding in correctional facilities.

“Conditions that cannot be met amount in substance to a refusal of bail and contribute directly to pre-trial detention and congestion in correctional facilities,” he stated.

The NBA president also rejected the practice of limiting acceptable sureties to a specific class of citizens, particularly senior civil servants.

“There is no evidence that civil servants are inherently more reliable as sureties than other law-abiding citizens.

“Such requirements unduly narrow the pool of eligible sureties and create artificial barriers to the enjoyment of a constitutional right,” he added.

Osigwe called on courts across the country to remain guided by the Constitution, the Administration of Criminal Justice Act and established judicial authorities when setting bail conditions.

“Bail conditions must be fair, reasonable, proportionate, and attainable. Courts must guard against imposing terms that render the grant of bail illusory or nugatory,” he said.

He further reminded judicial officers that every accused person enjoys the constitutional presumption of innocence until proven guilty by a competent court.

“Bail should not become a privilege reserved only for those with extraordinary means or connections.

“It must remain what the law intended it to be, a mechanism for securing attendance at trial while preserving the liberty and dignity of persons who have not been convicted of any offence,” Osigwe said.

03/06/2026

What to do if your account is unlawfully frozen.
If you discover your account has been blocked without a valid judicial order, you have clear legal remedies which includes-
1. Demand the basis: instruct your lawyer to formally write to your bank demanding the specific regulatory instrument or the certified true Copy (ctc) of the court Order backing the restriction.
2. Enforce fundamental rights: if your account was blocked by EFCC using its 72- hours Stop Order" and the 72- hours window has expired, and no court order exist, you can file a lawsuit against both the bank and the law enforcement agency for a flagrant violation of your constitutional right to property and fair hearing.
3. Claim substantial Damages: Nigerian courts regularly award millions of Naira in general and special damages to account holders to compensate for the economic hardship, business losses and reputational damages caused by illegal account restrictions.

In GTB PLC V ADEDAMOLA (2019) 5 NWLR (PT.1664) 30 AT 43. Per TIJJANI ABUBAKAR JCA has this to say_The constitution of th...
03/06/2026

In GTB PLC V ADEDAMOLA (2019) 5 NWLR (PT.1664) 30 AT 43.
Per TIJJANI ABUBAKAR JCA has this to say_
The constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria guarantees the right to own and enjoy property and requires that any interference with such rights be carried out in accordance with the law. Accordingly, where an account is frozen without lawful authority or without compliance with statutory and constitutional requirements, the affected customer may challenge the action in court and seek appropriate remedies, including damages (financial cost) against the law enforcement agency and the bank.
There are circumstances under applicable laws in which investigative agencies may approach a court and obtain orders authorising the restriction. Preservation, attachment, or freezing of funds suspected of being connected with criminal activities. Once a valid order is obtained, banks are legally obliged to comply with such orders.

The Supreme Court of Nigeria has affirmed the legal position that a purchaser of land who makes a part payment of the pu...
26/05/2026

The Supreme Court of Nigeria has affirmed the legal position that a purchaser of land who makes a part payment of the purchase price but defaults in paying the balance does not acquire valid title to the property, even where the purchaser is already in physical possession of the land holding that such possession is incapable of defeating the Vendor’s title. The prouncement was made by justice Abubakar, JSC, in the case of Mustapha V. Abubakar(2026)7 NWLR (Pt 2043)541 SC, where the apex Court upheld the Court of Appeal's decision to quash a trial court order for specific performance that had been granted in favour of a defaulting purchaser. This cass aroses from a land transaction in which the Appellant (purchaser) entered into an agreement to buy land from the Respondent (vendor). The purchaser made part payment of the purchase price and took possession of the property. However the purchaser failed to pay the balance of the purchase price within one week period agreed upon by both Parties even the vendor granted an extension of time and made a repeated demands for payment, the purchaser still failed to complete the purchaser still failed to complete the transaction by paying the outstanding balance. The vendor, having exhausted patience with the defaulting buyer, contested the validity of the purported sale. The matter went to the trial court, which granted an order of specific performance effectively ordering the vendor to complete the sale and transfer title to the purchaser despite the purchaser default in payment. The vendor appealed to the Court of Appeal, which quashed the trial court's order. The purchaser then appealed to the Supreme Court. Justice Abubakar JSC, delivering the judgment resolved the issue against the Appellant (purchaser) and in favour of the Respondent (vendor), holding, the law is settled that where a purchaser of land make a part payment of the purchase price but defaults in paying the balance, there can be no valid sale even where the purchaser is in possession, such possession is incapable of defeating the Vendor’s title.

Justice can never be cracked in a sane and democratic society. Freedom of expression should be not be criminalised in a ...
22/05/2026

Justice can never be cracked in a sane and democratic society. Freedom of expression should be not be criminalised in a society built on the tenet of democracy.

Congratulations senior man
16/05/2026

Congratulations senior man

13/05/2026

The court is a court of evidence, not court of justice. Decisions are given based on preponderance of evidence adduced by the parties. In court, evidence determines where justice tilt.

*LAND TRANSACTIONS HAVE CHANGED!*  The Supreme Court in ALIYU v. FRN (2026) LPELR-83493(SC) has again reinforced an impo...
11/05/2026

*LAND TRANSACTIONS HAVE CHANGED!* The Supreme Court in ALIYU v. FRN (2026) LPELR-83493(SC) has again reinforced an important legal position: ⚖️ Accepting CASH payment for the sale of landed property is an offence. The law requires payments for landed property transactions to be made through: Bank Transfers Cheques drawn on Nigerian banks Legal compliance is no longer optional in property transactions. As lawyers, realtors, buyers, and sellers, we must stay informed and properly guided. Knowledge. Compliance. Protection.

Address

Katampe By A*o Radio
Abuja
9000001

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Top-Notch Echelon Pace Chamber Lp 7377295 posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share