Advocate B B Gambhir

Advocate B B Gambhir Lawyer Since 2002

10/04/2024

Cause Title- Pathapati S***a Reddy (Died) by LRs & Ors. v. The Special Deputy Collector (LA) (Neutral Citation: 2024 INSC 286)

The Supreme Court has explained some important points to be kept in mind regarding the law of limitation and condonation of delay.

The Court was deciding a Special Leave Petition (SLP) preferred by the legal representatives of a man in a land acquisition case.

The two-Judge Bench of Justice Bela M. Trivedi and Justice Pankaj Mithal mentioned the following principles:

(i) Law of limitation is based upon public policy that there should be an end to litigation by forfeiting the right to remedy rather than the right itself;

(ii) A right or the remedy that has not been exercised or availed of for a long time must come to an end or cease to exist after a fixed period of time;

(iii) The provisions of the Limitation Act have to be construed differently, such as Section 3 has to be construed in a strict sense whereas Section 5 has to be construed liberally;

(iv) In order to advance substantial justice, though liberal approach, justice-oriented approach or cause of substantial justice may be kept in mind but the same cannot be used to defeat the substantial law of limitation contained in Section 3 of the Limitation Act;

(v) Courts are empowered to exercise discretion to condone the delay if sufficient cause had been explained, but that exercise of power is discretionary in nature and may not be exercised even if sufficient cause is established for various factors such as, where there is inordinate delay, negligence and want of due diligence;

(vi) Merely some persons obtained relief in similar matter, it does not mean that others are also entitled to the same benefit if the court is not satisfied with the cause shown for the delay in filing the appeal;

(vii) Merits of the case are not required to be considered in condoning the delay; and

(viii) Delay condonation application has to be decided on the parameters laid down for condoning the delay and condoning the delay for the reason that the conditions have been imposed, tantamounts to disregarding the statutory provision.

Key Highlights of New Criminal Laws
09/01/2024

Key Highlights of New Criminal Laws

09/06/2022
26/02/2022

The Constitution (Eighty-sixth Amendment) Act, 2002 inserted Article 21-A in the Constitution of India to provide free and compulsory education of all children in the age group of six to fourteen years as a Fundamental Right in such a manner as the State may, by law, determine.

Punjab Haryana Legal Reports Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5 Condonation of delay in filing appeal - Held, condonation of...
06/12/2021

Punjab Haryana Legal Reports

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5 Condonation of delay in filing appeal - Held, condonation of delay application filed in a casual manner without cogent or plausible ground cannot be accepted - Even delay of 09 months not explained by petitioner except that same was due to pandemic of Covid-19 - Therefore, dismissal of application proper. (Punjab And Haryana) [DocId #1888782]

Law Finder Doc Id # 1888782

Case titled, "K Natrajan and others versus Muthalammal"
18/07/2021

Case titled, "K Natrajan and others versus Muthalammal"

Hon'ble Justice Indu Malhotra and R. Subhash Reddy.
04/04/2021

Hon'ble Justice Indu Malhotra and R. Subhash Reddy.

Hon'ble Supreme Court passed the landmark judgment in case titled, "S.Vanitha versus Deputy Commissioner".
21/12/2020

Hon'ble Supreme Court passed the landmark judgment in case titled, "S.Vanitha versus Deputy Commissioner".

Address

Chamber No 640 Sixth Floor District Courts
Ludhiana
141008

Telephone

+919814820602

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Advocate B B Gambhir posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Advocate B B Gambhir:

Share