Litton Legal

01/09/2026

Artificial intelligence is becoming increasingly common in legal disputes, with people turning to tools such as ChatGPT to help prepare applications, submissions and other legal documents.

The growing use of AI has now prompted the Fair Work Commission to introduce new requirements for people who use generative AI in Commission proceedings.

The change comes after growing concerns about the accuracy and relevance of AI-generated legal material, including a recent case involving an ALDI employee who relied heavily on AI while pursuing an unfair dismissal claim.

Check out our latest blog article for more 🔗

Artificial intelligence is becoming increasingly common in legal disputes, with people turning to tools such as ChatGPT to help prepare applications, submissions and other legal documents. The growing use of AI has now prompted the Fair Work Commission to introduce new requirements for people who us...

19/08/2026

Words are essential tools in law! Legal language is incredibly important.

Sometimes words are only relevant to law (they have no other meaning elsewhere). Other times very common terms take on a different meaning altogether when used in law.

This week’s is the term “Watermark.”

SWIPE for the definition 👉🏻

As AI-generated content becomes increasingly common, watermarking is emerging as an important tool for identifying content created or modified using AI. Some AI companies are now developing or introducing invisible watermarks that can help indicate whether content was generated using their technology.

Watermarking can play an important role in digital provenance, transparency and authenticity, but a watermark does not, by itself, establish copyright ownership or prove who authored a work.

At Litton Legal, we assist businesses in navigating the legal issues arising from emerging technologies, including intellectual property, copyright and AI-related matters.

Contact our office at [email protected] for further assistance.

16/08/2026

AI-generated content is becoming increasingly difficult to distinguish from human-created work. Now, some AI companies are turning to watermarking as a way of identifying content generated by their systems.

An AI watermark can be embedded into content in a way that is difficult to see or remove, helping identify its origin or indicate that AI was involved in its creation.

But what does that mean from an intellectual property perspective?

A watermark does not automatically establish copyright ownership.

Copyright generally protects original expression, but AI-generated material raises increasingly complex questions about authorship, originality and the extent of human involvement.

A watermark may help provide evidence about the provenance of content, where it came from and whether AI was involved, but it does not, by itself, determine who owns the copyright or whether copyright exists in the first place.

It could, however, become an increasingly useful tool in disputes involving the origin, authenticity or use of digital content.

At Litton Legal, we advise businesses on intellectual property, copyright and the legal issues arising from emerging technologies.

Contact our office at [email protected] for further assistance.

06/08/2026

We’ve been in our new Albury office for over a year now and have settled in well.

Just a reminder on what we do:

At Litton Legal, we offer bespoke legal services specialising in Commercial Law, Intellectual Property, and Dispute Resolution across our offices in Albury, Sydney, and Melbourne.

From startups to established corporations, and regional businesses to international clients, we serve a diverse range of industries across Australia and worldwide.

We pride ourselves on building strong client relationships and emphasising the human side of law. Our tailored legal solutions offer a fresh perspective compared to traditional, outdated approaches.

Whether you’re seeking expert advice in commercial law or need strategic support in managing disputes, Litton Legal is passionate about helping you do business better by minimising risks and resolving conflicts efficiently.

Need assistance?

Get in contact with our friendly team here: [email protected]

05/08/2026

Workplace discrimination isn’t always obvious or intentional, and it’s important employers are mindful of this.

Many employers assume a discrimination claim only arises where there is deliberate unfair treatment. However, workplace decisions around recruitment, remuneration, promotions, performance management, flexible work arrangements and termination can risk being discriminatory if they’re not handled fairly and consistently.

Objective decision-making, accurate record-keeping, clear workplace policies, and well-documented processes can significantly reduce the risk of disputes.

Employers should regularly review their workplace practices and seek legal advice before issues escalate.

At Litton Legal, we work with employers to proactively manage workplace risks, resolve disputes and navigate complex employment law matters with confidence.

Contact our friendly team for further assistance on [email protected]

02/08/2026

When actress and filmmaker Rebel Wilson was recently cleared of defaming her The Deb co-star Charlotte MacInnes, it wasn’t her first run-in with a defamation lawsuit.

The case attracted widespread media attention, with reports emerging that Wilson had taken out insurance to help protect against the financial risks of the litigation.

So, what exactly is defamation insurance?

Check out our latest blog article for more.

Link in bio or our stories 🔗

21/07/2026

Qantas has agreed to a $105 million settlement in a class action alleging customers were issued restrictive flight credits instead of refunds for COVID-cancelled flights.

Qantas has made no admission of liability, but it follows the airline’s separate “ghost flights” matter, where Qantas was penalised after admitting it sold tickets for thousands of flights it had already decided to cancel.

When it comes to maintaining brand trust and loyalty, it’s paramount that businesses offer transparency, clear communication and full compliance with consumer law at all times.

Qantas customers are currently being notified they may be eligible for access to the multi-million-dollar settlement.

As for the no admission of liability? This is a strategic position for defendants in settlements that helps to minimise financial exposure, prevent collateral damage in future lawsuits, and protect their public reputation.

13/07/2026

Words are essential tools in law! Legal language is incredibly important.

Sometimes words are only relevant to law (they have no other meaning elsewhere). Other times very common terms take on a different meaning altogether when used in law.

This week’s is the term “AML/CTF Compliance Framework.”
SWIPE for the definition 👉🏻

An AML/CTF Compliance Framework is the documented system of policies, procedures and controls a business puts in place to identify, assess and manage the risks of money laundering, terrorism financing and proliferation financing, while meeting its legal obligations under Australia’s AML/CTF regime.

From 1 July 2026, a broader range of businesses were brought into Australia’s AML/CTF regime, requiring them to establish and maintain a tailored compliance framework that reflects the size, nature and risk profile of their operations.

At Litton Legal, we assist businesses in understanding and meeting their AML/CTF obligations, including developing practical, risk-based compliance frameworks aligned with regulatory requirements.

Contact our office at [email protected] for further assistance.

09/07/2026

Recent Fair Work Commission (FWC) decisions have ruled in favour of employers, highlighting that flexible work arrangements remain a matter of balancing employee circumstances with genuine business needs.

In several recent cases, the FWC has upheld employers’ decisions to refuse or modify work-from-home requests where there were reasonable operational grounds - including the need for collaboration, supervision, and uninterrupted focus.

These decisions come amid the proposed Victorian legislation that could give employees a stronger legal entitlement to work from home, reinforcing the importance for employers to understand their obligations and approach flexible work requests carefully.

Clear communication, genuine consultation, and sound decision-making remain essential when managing workforce flexibility.

Need guidance on managing flexible work requests or navigating employment obligations? Contact our friendly team for advice and support at [email protected]

06/07/2026

The Victorian Government has introduced legislation that would give eligible employees whose roles can reasonably be performed remotely the legal right to work from home up to two days per week (pro rata for part-time and regular casual employees).

If passed, the new laws are expected to:

-Apply from 1 September 2026 for most employers.
-Commence from 1 July 2027 for businesses with fewer than 15 employees.
-Require employees to provide written notice of their intended work-from-home arrangements.
-Require employers to respond within 21 days and only refuse where specific legislative criteria are met.
-Provide a dispute resolution pathway through the Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission and VCAT.

The proposed reforms would take flexible work being a negotiated arrangement to becoming a statutory workplace entitlement for eligible Victorian employees.

As with any new workplace legislation, employers should familiarise themselves with their rights and obligations before the laws commence.

What do you think about the proposed laws?